Plant Soil Environ., 2004, 50(7):324-331 | DOI: 10.17221/4039-PSE

Effect of different mulching and cutting regimes on the vegetation of upland meadow

J. Gaisler, M. Hejcman, V. Pavlů
1 ResearchInstitute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Grassland Research Station Liberec, Czech Republic
2 Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic

The effect of different cutting and mulching regimes on the structure of the sward and plant species diversity of semi-natural meadow (Arrhenatherion alliance) was investigated in manipulative experiment over five years. Mulching once a year in September (MS) and plots without management (U) developed in the same way and resulted in increase of Veronica chamaedrys and Galium album and disappearance of light sensitive Trifolium repens. T. repens increased in two cut, two cut without removal of the biomass and in three times mulched treatments. The lowest species diversity was recorded under MS and U treatments on the end of the experiment. Mulching once a year in July altered the vegetation in a different way than the MS treatment. Our results indicate high importance of term of mulching and frequency of defoliation management on the development of grassland vegetation.

Keywords: Arrhenatherion; botanical composition; defoliation frequency; permanent grassland; management

Published: July 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gaisler J, Hejcman M, Pavlů V. Effect of different mulching and cutting regimes on the vegetation of upland meadow. Plant Soil Environ. 2004;50(7):324-331. doi: 10.17221/4039-PSE.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bakker J.P. (1989): Nature management by grazing and cutting. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Geobotany 14, Dordrecht: 173-184. Go to original source...
    2. Hejcman M., Březina S., Rauch O. (2002): Livestock grazing as an alternative management for montane grasslands in the Giant Mountains - preliminary results. In: Bottarin R., Tappeiner U. (eds.): Interdisciplinary mountain research. Blackwell Verlag, Berlin: 220-230.
    3. Krahulec F., Skálová H., Herben T., Hadincová V., Wildová R., Pecháčková S. (2001): Vegetation changes following sheep grazing in abandoned mountain meadows. Appl. Veg. Sci., 4: 97-102. Go to original source...
    4. Kubát K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J., Jr., Kaplan Z., Kirschner J., Štěpánek J. (eds.) (2002): Klíč ke květeně České republiky. Academia, Praha.
    5. Kvítek T., Klímová P., Šonka J. (1998): Vliv mulčování na botanické složení a pokryvnost lučního porostu, evapotranspiraci a vlhkost půdy. Rostl. Výr., 44: 553-560.
    6. Laser H. (2002): Long-term and short-term effects of undisturbed plant succession, mulching, and meadow utilisation on the botanical diversity in a moist Arrhenatherion elatioris. Grassl. Sci. Eur., 7: 806-807.
    7. Lexa M., Krahulec F. (2000): Vliv mulčování na rozkladné procesy a druhové složení horských luk v Krkonoších. Opera Concort., 36: 571-577.
    8. Pavlů V., Hejcman M., Pavlů L., Gaisler J. (2003): Effect of rotational and contiuous grazing on vegetation of the upland grassland in the Jizerské hory Mts., Czech Republic. Folia Geobot., 38: 21-34. Go to original source...
    9. Pecháčková S., Krahulec F. (1995): Efficient nitrogen economy: Key to the success of Polygonum bistorta in an abandoned mountain meadow. Folia Geobot. Phytotax., 30: 211-222. Go to original source...
    10. Ryser P., Langenauer R., Gigon A. (1995): Species richness and vegetation structure in a limestone grassland after 15 years management with six biomass removal regimes. Folia Geobot. Phytotax., 30: 157-167. Go to original source...
    11. Smith R., Rushton S.P. (1994): The effects of grazing management on the vegetation of mesotrophic (meadow) grassland in Northern England. J. Appl. Ecol., 31: 13-24. Go to original source...
    12. ter Braak C.J.F., Šmilauer P. (1998): CANOCO Release 4. Reference Manual and User 's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca.
    13. Zelený D., Šraitová D., Mašková Z., Květ J. (2001): Management effects on a mountain meadow plant community. Silva Gabreta, 7: 745-754.
    14. Ziliotto U., Gianelle D., Scotton M. (2002): Effect of the extensification on permanent meadow in high productive environment: 1 - botanical aspects. Grassl. Sci. Eur., 7: 862-863.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content