Plant Soil Environ., 2004, 50(10):456-462 | DOI: 10.17221/4058-PSE

Callus induction and regeneration efficiency of spring barley cultivars registered in the Czech Republic

V. ©erhantová, J. Ehrenbergerová, L. Ohnoutková
1 Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Olomouc, Czech Republic

Immature zygotic embryos are frequently used for induction of cell cultures in vitro and for genetic transformation. The effect of three synthetic auxins: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid (dicamba) and 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) on induction and subsequent regeneration capacity of barley. In vitro culture was studied in 12 spring barley cultivars registered in the Czech Republic and a variety of Golden Promise, with known high regeneration efficiency. The callus formation frequency and number of green regenerants were influenced significantly both by genotype and auxin. Most cultivars formed statistically significantly a higher mean number of regenerants (1.95) after the callus induction on the medium with 2.4-D as compared to the media with picloram and dicamba. Only two cultivars (Nordus and SG-S-261) did not respond to the used auxins differently. The highest average number of regenerants (from all three auxins) was obtained with Golden Promise (2.7 plants per one cultivated scutellum). From the set of genotypes used in our study, the cultivars Atribut, Forum, and Scarlett with the mean number of regenerants (2.09-1.57) would be the most suitable cultivars for further transformation use. They differ statistically significantly from the cultivars Nordus, Amulet, Akcent, SG-S-252, Orbit, and Granát (0.42-0.92) which had the lowest mean number of regenerants.

Keywords: immature zygotic embryos; auxin; 2,4-D; picloram; dicamba; spring barley

Published: October 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©erhantová V, Ehrenbergerová J, Ohnoutková L. Callus induction and regeneration efficiency of spring barley cultivars registered in the Czech Republic. Plant Soil Environ. 2004;50(10):456-462. doi: 10.17221/4058-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Baillie A.M.R., Rossnagel B.G., Kartha, K.K. (1993): Evaluation of 10 Canadian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars for tissue culture response. Can. J. Plant Sci., 73: 171-174. Go to original source...
  2. Bregitzer P. (1992): Plant regeneration and callus type in barley: effect of genotype and culture medium. Crop Sci., 32: 1108-1112. Go to original source...
  3. Bregitzer P., Campbell R. (2001): Genetic markers associated with green and albino plant regeneration from embryogenic barley callus. Crop Sci., 41: 173-179. Go to original source...
  4. Bregitzer P., Campbell R.D., Wu Y. (1995): Plant regeneration from barley callus: Effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and phenylacetic acid. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 43: 229-235. Go to original source...
  5. Bregitzer P., Dahleen L.S., Campbell R.D. (1998): Enhancement of plant regeneration from embryonic callus of commercial barley cultivars. Plant Cell Rep., 17: 941-946. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Castillo A.M., Egana B., Sanz J.M., Cistue L. (1998): Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from barley cultivars grown in Spain. Plant Cell Rep., 17: 902-906. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Chang Y., Zitzewitz J., Hayes P.M., Chen T.H.H. (2003): High frequency plant regeneration form immature embryos of an elite barley cultivars (Horedum vulgare L. cv. Morex). Plant Cell Rep., 21: 733-738. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Chloupek O. (1996): Zemìdìlský výzkum. Academia, Praha.
  9. Choi H., Lemaux P.G., Cho M. (2001): Selection and osmotic treatment exacerbate cytological aberration in transformed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Plant Physiol., 158: 935-943. Go to original source...
  10. Conger B.V., Hanning G.E., Gray D.J., McDaniel J.K. (1983): Direct embryogenesis from mesophyl cells of orchard grass. Science, 221: 850-851. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Dahleen L.S., Bregitzer P. (2002): An improved media system for high regeneration rates from barley immature embryo-derived callus cultures of commercial cultivars. Crop Sci., 42: 934-938. Go to original source...
  12. Eudes F., Acharya S., Laroche A., Selinger L.B., Cheng K.J. (2003): A novel method to induce direct somatic embryogenesis, secondary embryogenesis and regeneration of fertile green cereal plants. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 73: 147-157. Go to original source...
  13. Ganeshan S., Båga M., Harwey B.L., Rossnagel B.G., Scoles G.J., Chibbar R.N. (2003): Production of multiple shoots from thiadiazuron-treated mature embryos and leaf-base/apical meristems of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 73: 57-64. Go to original source...
  14. Harwood W.A., Bean S.J., Chen D.-F., Mullineaux P.M., Snape J.W. (1995): Transformation studies in Hordeum vulgare using a highly regenerable microspore system. Euphytica, 85: 113-118. Go to original source...
  15. Jiang W., Cho M.J., Lemaux P.G. (1998): Improved callus quality and prolonged regenerability in model and recalcitrant barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Plant Biotechnol., 15: 63-69. Go to original source...
  16. Karp A., Steele S.H., Parmar S., Jones M.G.K., Shewry P.R., Breiman A. (1987): Relative stability among barley plants regenerated from cultured immature embryos. Genome, 29: 405-412. Go to original source...
  17. Lührs R., Lörz H. (1987): Plant regeneration in vitro from embryogenic cultures of spring- and wintertype barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet., 75: 16-25. Go to original source...
  18. Murashigee T., Skoog F. (1962): A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plantarum, 15: 473-497. Go to original source...
  19. Przetakiewicz A., Orczyk W., Nadolska-Orczyk A. (2003): The effect of auxin on plant regeneration of wheat, barley and triticale. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 73: 245-246. Go to original source...
  20. Ruíz M.J., Rueda J., Peláez M.I., Espino F.J., Candela M., Sendino A.M., Vázquez A.M. (1992): Somatic embryogenesis, plant regeneration and somaclonal variation in barley. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 28: 97-101. Go to original source...
  21. Steven P.K., Kasha K.J. (1994): Optimizing somatic embryogenesis and particle bombardement of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) immature embryos. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol., 30P: 117-123. Go to original source...
  22. Thomas M.R., Scott K.J. (1985): Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis from callus initiated from immature embryos and immature inflorescences of Hordeum vulgare L. J. Plant Physiol., 121: 159-169. Go to original source...
  23. Tingay S., McElroy D., Kalla R., Fieg. S., Wang M., Thornton S., Brettell R. (1997): Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated barley transformation. Plant J., 11: 1369-1376. Go to original source...
  24. Trifanova A., Madsen S., Olesen A. (2001): Agrobacterium-mediated transgene delivery and integration into barley under a range of in vitro culture conditions. Plant Sci., 161: 871-880. Go to original source...
  25. Wan Y., Lemaux P.G. (1994): Generation of large number of independently transformed fertile barley plants. Plant Physiol., 104: 37-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Wang Z., Lehmann D., Bell J., Hopkins A. (2002): Development of an efficient plant regeneration system for Russian wildrye (Psathyrostachys juncea). Plant Cell Rep., 20: 797-801. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.