Plant Soil Environ., 2004, 50(12):547-551 | DOI: 10.17221/4072-PSE
Temporal variability of available phosphorus, potassium and magnesium in arable soil
- Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic
The investigation is focused on the illustration of the temporal changes in spatial variability of the Mehlich III available phosphorus, potassium and magnesium in the 10.5 hapart of the whole 54 hafield, located near Český Brod. Soil is characterized as Orthic Luvisol. To estimate temporal variability of available nutrients, soil samples were taken in 2001-2003 four times per year (twice in spring and twice in the autumn periods). For the description of field variability of selected soil parameters coefficient of variation (CV), experimental variograms with fitted models and relative nugget effect parameters have been used. Three year results shows that the lowest temporal variability, characterized by relative nugget effect had available Mg (4-23%) and P (13-29%) and K (15-49%).
Keywords: temporal variability; spatial variability; phosphorus; potassium; magnesium; Mehlich III
Published: December 31, 2004 Show citation
References
- Borůvka L., Donátová H., Němeček K. (2002): Spatial distribution and correlation of soil properties in a field: a case study. Rostl. Výr., 48: 425-432.
Go to original source... - Brodský L., Vaněk V., Borůvka L., Száková J. (2004): Consistency of spatial dependence of soil chemical properties in two fields: a geostatistical study. Plant Soil Environ., 50: 507-512.
Go to original source... - Brodský L., Vaněk V., Száková J., Štípek K. (2001): Spatial variability of soil properties. Rostl. Výr., 47: 521-528.
- Cambardella C.A., Karlen D.L. (1999): Spatial analysis of soil fertility parameters. Precis. Agr., BIOS Sci. Publ. Ltd.: 5-14.
Go to original source... - Dampney P.M.R., Froment M.A., Dawson C.J. (1997): The variability of pH and available phosphorus, potassium and magnesium in soils within arable fields in England. Precis. Agr., BIOS Sci. Publ. Ltd.: 79-86.
- Hoskinson R.L., Hess J.R., Alessi R.S. (1999): Temporal changes in the spatial variability of soil nutrients. Precis. Agr., BIOS Sci. Publ. Ltd.: 61-69.
- Kowalenko C.G. (1991): Fall vs. spring soil sampling for calibrating nutrient applications on individual fields. J. Prod. Agr., 4: 322-329.
Go to original source... - Le Clerq E.L., Leonard W.H., Clark A.G. (1962): Field plot technique. 2nd ed. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis, USA.
- Peck T.R., Melsted S.W. (1973): Field sampling for soil testing. In: Walsh L.M., Beacon J.D. (eds.): Soil testing and plant analysis. SSSA, Madison, USA: 67-75.
- Pierce F.J., Nowak P. (1999): Aspects of precision agriculture. Adv. Agron., 67: 85.
Go to original source... - Pierce F.J., Sadler E.J. (1997): The state of site-specific management for agriculture. Am. Soc. Inc., USA.
Go to original source... - Štípek K. (2003): Spatial and temporal variability of soil available P, K and Mg and soil pH. [Ph.D. Thesis.]. (In Czech)
- Wollenhaupt N.C., Wolkowski R.P., Clayton M.K. (1994): Mapping soil test phosphorus and potassium for variable-rate fertilizer application. J. Prod. Agr., 7: 441-448.
Go to original source... - Zbíral J. (2001): Comparison of soil extraction methods for macronutrients detection in soils of the Czech Republic. ÚKZÚZ, Brno. (In Czech)
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

