Plant Soil Environ., 2010, 56(6):297-304 | DOI: 10.17221/23/2010-PSE

Differences in available phosphorus evaluated by soil tests in relation to detection by colorimetric and ICP-AES techniques

J. Matula
Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

Differences in the evaluation of soil phosphorus status by three soil tests (Mehlich 3, extraction with NH4-acetate and water extraction) were tested on 63 agricultural soils with different agrochemical characteristics from the territory of the Czech Republic. Differences between the colorimetric determination of phosphorus and ICP technique were studied. The median of the values of phosphorus supply in soils determined by soil tests was considerably different. Compared to the colorimetric detection of water extraction of soils the median of the NH4-acetate test showed 2.2 times higher values and in Mehlich 3 test the values were 34.8 times higher. The largest difference between the end-point analytical techniques of phosphorus determination, colorimetry and ICP-AES, was observed in the soil test of water extraction. The median of the values determined by ICP-AES was higher by 47%. In NH4-acetate extraction of soils the median of the measured values of phosphorus was higher by 12% and in Mehlich 3 extraction by 7%. Differences in phosphorus concentrations determined by colorimetry and by ICP-AES increased as the phosphorus supply in soils decreased. When the supply of 'available' phosphorus in soil is given, it is always necessary to specify the used soil test including the end-point analytical technique of phosphorus determination to avoid the misleading interpretation of results. The problem of phosphorus in agriculture and in the environment requires thorough revision and methodical standardization.

Keywords: Mehlich 3; NH4-acetate extraction; water extraction; phosphorus; colorimetry; ICP-AES technique

Published: June 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Matula J. Differences in available phosphorus evaluated by soil tests in relation to detection by colorimetric and ICP-AES techniques. Plant Soil Environ. 2010;56(6):297-304. doi: 10.17221/23/2010-PSE.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Baldwin D.S. (1998): Reactive 'organic' phosphorus revisited. Water Research, 32: 2265-2270. Go to original source...
    2. Blackwell M.S.A., Brookes P.C., Fuente-Martinez N. de la, Murray P.J., Snars K.E., Williams J.K., Haygarth P.M. (2009): Effects of soil drying and rate of re-wetting on concentrations and forms of phosphorus in leachate. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45: 635-643. Go to original source...
    3. Houba V.J.G., Novozamsky I., van der Lee J.J. (1994): Status and future of soil and plant analysis. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 25: 753-765. Go to original source...
    4. Jones J.B., Jr. (1998): Soil test methods: past, present, and future use of soil extractants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29: 1543-1552. Go to original source...
    5. Ebeling D.D., Davis J.G. (2009): Impact of experimental factors in soil phosphorus tests: shaking vessel, filtration, and centrifugation. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40: 1610-1623. Go to original source...
    6. Kowalenko C.G., Babuin D. (2007): Interference problems with phosphoantimonylmolybdenum colorimetric measurement of phosphorus in soil and plant materials. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 38: 1299-1316. Go to original source...
    7. Mallarino A.P. (2003): Field calibration for corn of the Mehlich-3 soil phosphorus test with colorimetric and inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy determination methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68: 1928-1934. Go to original source...
    8. Matula J. (1996): Determination of potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, manganese and cation exchange capacity for fertilizer recommendations used by Czech Union of Rapeseed Growers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 27: 1679-1691. Go to original source...
    9. Matula J. (2009a): A relationship between multi-nutrient soil tests (Mehlich 3, ammonium acetate, and water extraction) and bioavailability of nutrients from soils for barley. Plant, Soil and Environment, 55: 173-180. Go to original source...
    10. Matula J. (2009b): Possible phosphorus losses from the top layer of agricultural soils by rainfall simulations in relation to multinutrient soil tests. Plant, Soil and Environment, 55: 511-518. Go to original source...
    11. Murphy J., Riley J.P. (1962): A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27: 31-36. Go to original source...
    12. Regan J.T., Rodgers M., Healy M.G., Kirwan L., Fenton O. (2010): Determining phosphorus and sediment release rates from five irish tillage soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39: 185-192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Robards K., McKelvie I.D., Benson R.L., Worsfold P.J., Brundell N.J., Casey H. (1994): Determination of carbon, phosphorus, nitrogen and silicon species in waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 287: 147-190. Go to original source...
    14. Sims J.R., Haby V.A. (1971): Simplified colorimetric determination of soil organic matter. Soil Science, 112: 137-141. Go to original source...
    15. Skalar (1992): Soil and Plant Analysis. Skalar Methods. Breda.
    16. SPAC Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Inc. (1999): Soil Analysis Handbook of Reference Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C.
    17. Soldat D.J., Petrovic A.M., Ketterings Q.M. (2009): Effect of soil phosphorus levels on phosphorus runoff concentrations from turfgrass. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 99: 33-34. Go to original source...
    18. Styles D., Coxon C. (2006): Laboratory drying of organic-matter rich soils: Phosphorus solubility effects, influence of soil characteristics, and consequences for environmental interpretation. Geoderma, 136: 120-135. Go to original source...
    19. Worsfold P.J., Gimbert L.J., Mankasingh U., Omaka O.N., Hanrahan G., Gardolinski P.C.F.C., Haygarth P.M., Turner B.L., Keith-Roach M.J., McKelvie I.D. (2005): Sampling, sample treatment and quality assurance issues for the determination of phosphorus species in natural waters and soils. Talanta, 66: 273-293. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Zbíral J. (2002): Analyses of Soils I. Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Methodology, Brno, Czech Republic.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content