Plant Soil Environ., 2010, 56(12):564-569 | DOI: 10.17221/187/2010-PSE

The effect of time of cutting on yield and the quality of the hop hybrid varieties Harmonie, Rubín and Agnus

K. Krofta, J. Ježek
Hop Research Institute Co. Ltd., Žatec, Czech Republic

The influence of mechanized cutting time on the yield and quality of hops was studied for three years (2007, 2008 and 2009) in three Czech hybrid varieties Harmonie, Rubín and Agnus. The cutting term classified as 'early' was carried out at the turn of March and April. Further cutting dates were made at intervals of 7-10 days and they were classified as 'middle' and 'late' ones. Yield and contents of alpha acids were evaluated during the machine harvest. The measured data revealed no statistical relationship between term of cutting, alpha acid content and yield in any of the tested cultivars. However, during the experimental period considerable inter-annual differences were observed, especially in the yield. Average yield in the range of 2.0-2.5 t/ha in the period 2007-2008 decreased to 1.2-1.9 t/ha in 2009 due to downy mildew attack. On the basis of the obtained data it can be recommended to cut the hybrid varieties Harmonie, Rubín and Agnus in the first ten days of April, taking into account other factors such as age and the location of hop garden and current weather conditions.

Keywords: hops; hop cutting; term of cutting; yield of hops; quality of hops; alpha acid

Published: December 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krofta K, Ježek J. The effect of time of cutting on yield and the quality of the hop hybrid varieties Harmonie, Rubín and Agnus. Plant Soil Environ. 2010;56(12):564-569. doi: 10.17221/187/2010-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Analytica (1998): European Brewery Convention. 5th Edition. Section 7, Method 7.7. Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nürnberg, Germany.
  2. Kopecky J., Sachl J. (1985): Quality of cutting and the yield of hops. Chmelarstvi, 58: 20-22. (In Czech)
  3. Kopecky J. (2008): Cultivation of Hop Hybrid Varieties in Growing Regions of the Czech Republic. Methodology for practice. Hop Research Institute, Žatec. (In Czech)
  4. Koren J. (2007): Influence of plantation raw spacing on quality and yield of hops. Plant, Soil and Environment, 53: 276-282. Go to original source...
  5. Krofta K., Kucera J. (2009): Mathematical Model for the Prediction of Yield and Alpha Acid Contents from Meteorological Data for Saaz Aroma Variety. Proceedings of the Scientific Commission IHGC, Leon, Spain, 105-108.
  6. Krivanek J. (2008): Response of the Czech hybrid hop cultivar Agnus to the term of pruning, depth of pruning and number of trained bines. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54: 471-478. Go to original source...
  7. Sachl J. (1967): The influence of mechanized cutting on hop plants. [PhD Thesis.] VÚCH Zatec, Žatec. (In Czech)
  8. Sachl J. (1968): Lifetime of hop plants after mechanized cutting. Chmelarstvi, 41: 152-153. (In Czech)
  9. Snobl J. (1981): Theoretical aspects of hop cutting. Chmelarstvi, 54: 36-37. (In Czech)
  10. Stranc P. (2007): Cutting of Saaz Aroma Variety in the Conditions of Growing Regions of the Czech Republic. Methodology for Practice. Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague. (In Czech)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.