Plant Soil Environ., 2011, 57(6):264-270 | DOI: 10.17221/30/2011-PSE
Photosynthetic activity of selected genotypes of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) in critical periods for yield formation
- Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
This paper evaluates the influence of genotype on the photosynthetic activity of hops in the period critical for generating yield. Results over three years from measuring the photosynthesis rate statistically show an increase in the photosynthetic activity of hop plants in the flowering stage. The average photosynthetic rates from measurements on the second date (BBA 65) in the years 2007, 2008, and 2009 increased by 17.9%, 45.6%, and 49.2%, respectively. Different photosynthesis curve trends during the final stage of ontogenesis of the plants indicate the maturity level of each hop genotype. As regards the genotypes for which photosynthesis did not reduce significantly, it may be assumed that such plants had not reached technical maturity. The results from the three-year study also show that any promising genotype, with respect to the photosynthesis rate and yield, is the result of breeding of new varieties with greater resistance to drought and high temperatures. Very good results in photosynthetic activity were reached by the new varieties exhibiting high yield and a similar chemical composition to Saaz hop and those sharing the same origins to Saaz, showing a higher content of bitter substances. In 2008 and 2009, all three new forms reached yield levels of 2.35 to 3.12 t/ha of dry hops.
Keywords: hops; photosynthesis rate; varieties; hop cone yield
Published: June 30, 2011 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Bruns H.A., Abel C.A. (2003): Nitrogen fertility effect on BT δ-endotoxin and nitrogen concentration of maize during early growth. Agronomy Journal, 95: 207-211.
Go to original source...
- Changhai S., Baodi D., Yunzhou Q., Yuxin L., Lei S., Mengyu L., Haipei L. (2010): Physiological regulation of high transpiration efficiency in winter wheat under drought conditions. Plant, Soil and Environment, 56: 340-347.
Go to original source...
- Coviella C.E., Stipanovic R.D., Trumble J.T. (2002): Plant allocation to defensive compounds: interaction between elevated CO2 and nitrogen in transgenic cotton plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53: 323-331.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Crepinsek Z. (1996): A dynamic model of growth, developement and yield of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) related to environmental parameters. Zborník Biotechniske fakultete v Ljubljani. Kmetijstvo, 67: 19-32.
- Dogan M., Tipirdamaz R., Demir Y. (2010): Salt resistance of tomato species grown in sand culture. Plant, Soil and Environment, 56: 499-507.
Go to original source...
- Hnilickova H., Hnilicka F. (2006): Water stress and his research at the hop. Chmelarství, 79: 91-94. (In Czech)
- Kakani W.G., Reddy K.R., Zhao D., Gao W. (2004): Senescence and hyperspectral reflectance of cotton leaves exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation and carbon dioxide. Journal of Plant Physiology, 121: 250-257.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kenny S.T. (2005): Photosynthetic measurement in hops (Humulus). Acta Horticulturae, 668: 241-248.
Go to original source...
- Krofta K., Jezek J. (2010): The effect of time of cutting on yield and the quality of the hop hybrid varieties of Harmonie, Rubin and Agnus. Plant, Soil and Evironment, 56: 564-569.
Go to original source...
- Larcher W., Biederman M., Thorson A. (1995): Physiological Plant Ecology. Issue 3. Springher, Berlin, 303.
Go to original source...
- Matzke A.J.M. (1990): Gene interaction and epigenetic variation in transgenic plants. Developmental Genetics, 11: 214-223.
Go to original source...
- Reynolds M.P., Delgado M.L., Gutiérrez-Rodrígues M., LanquéSaavedra A. (2000): Photosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment I: Genetic diversity and crop productivity. Field Crops Research, 66: 37-50.
Go to original source...
- Rybacek V. (1980): Hop Growing. SZN Praha, Praha, 426. (In Czech)
- Sestak Z., Catsky J. (1966): Methods of studying the photosynthetic production of plants. Academia, Praha, 394. (In Czech)
- Traore S.B., Carlson R.E., Pilcher C.D., Rice M.E. (2000): Bt and non-Bt maize growth and development as affected by temperature and drought stress. Agronomy Journal, 92: 1027-1035.
Go to original source...
- Wullschleger S.D., Oosterhuis D.M. (1990): Photosynthesis of individual field-grown cotton leaves during ontogeny. Photosynthesis Research, 23: 163-170.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Yu G.R., Zhuang J., Yu Z.L. (2001): An attempt to establish a synthetic model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on stomatal behaviour for maize and soybean plants grown in fields. Journal Plant Physiology, 158: 861-874.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.