Plant Soil Environ., 2013, 59(1):8-13 | DOI: 10.17221/374/2012-PSE

The influence of land use practices on earthworm communities in saline agriculture soils of the west coast region of China's Bohai BayOriginal Paper

Y. Tao1,3, W. Gu1, J. Chen1,2, J. Tao1, Y.J. Xu1, H. Zhang1
1 State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P.R. China
2 Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Civil Affairs and Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P.R. China
3 College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northeast Normal University,

The effects of land use practices on soil fauna, especially earthworms, are poorly known in coastal saline agricultural soils. Here we compare earthworm communities in six types of land use practice in the coastal region of China's Bohai Bay, namely uncultivated saline soil, two orchard (pear and winter jujube) lands, man-made forests (chinese ash), vegetable land and cropped land (maize). In addition, we recorded selected physicochemical properties of the soil. Soil organic matter content and total N were significantly higher under pear orchard and vegetable land than under the other land use practices, and their lowest values were observed from uncultivated saline soil. Vegetable land and pear orchard land showed a significantly higher abundance of earthworms than the other land use practices, whereas no earthworm was found in uncultivated saline soil. The sites under individual practices supported one to three earthworm species. Aporrectodea trapezoides species was present under four types of land use practice, and the biomass of this species accounted for more than 60% of the community. Vegetable land and pear orchard land supported richer earthworm community than the other land use practices, dominated by Aporrectodea trapezoides and Drawida japonica. These preliminary results indicated that land use practices have substantial effects on the abundance and composition of earthworm communities in saline soils.

Keywords: soil fauna; community structure; biological environment; salt-affected agricultural soils

Published: January 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tao Y, Gu W, Chen J, Tao J, Xu YJ, Zhang H. The influence of land use practices on earthworm communities in saline agriculture soils of the west coast region of China's Bohai Bay. Plant Soil Environ. 2013;59(1):8-13. doi: 10.17221/374/2012-PSE.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ammer S., Weber K., Abs C., Ammer C., Prietzel J. (2006): Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of earthworm communities in pure and converted Scots pine stands. Applied Soil Ecology, 33: 10-21. Go to original source...
    2. Baker G. (2007): Differences in nitrogen release from surface and incorporated plant residues by two endogeic species of earthworms (Lumbricidae) in a red-brown earth soil in southern Australia. European Journal of Soil Biology, 43: S165-S170. Go to original source...
    3. Blair J.M., Parmelee R.W., Lavelle P. (1995): Influences of earthworms on biogeochemistry. In: Hendrix P.F. (ed.): Earthworm Ecology and Biogeography in North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 127-158.
    4. Blakemore L.C., Searle P.L., Daly B.K. (1972): Methods for Chemical Analysis of Soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau Report 10A. Government Printer, Wellington.
    5. Bonkowski M., Schaefer M. (1997): Interactions between earthworms and soil protozoa: A trophic component in the soil food web. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29: 499-502. Go to original source...
    6. Brown G.G., Doube B.M. (2004): The functional interactions between earthworms, microorganisms, organic matter, and plant. In: Edwards C.A. (ed.): Earthworm Ecology. 2nd Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 213-240. Go to original source...
    7. Clapperton J., Chan K.Y., Larney F.J. (2004): Managing the soil habitat for enhanced biological fertility. In: Abbott L., Murphy D. (eds.): Soil Biological Fertility - A Key to Sustainable Land Use in Agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 203-224. Go to original source...
    8. Dlamini T.C., Haynes R.J. (2004): Influence of agricultural land use on the size and composition of earthworm communities in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Applied Soil Ecology, 27: 77-88. Go to original source...
    9. Edwards C.A., Bohlen P.J., Linden D.R., Subler S. (1995): Earthworms in agroecosystems. In: Hendrix P.F. (ed.): Earthworm Ecology and Biogeography in North America. Lewis, Boca Raton, 185-213.
    10. Edwards W.M., Shipitalo M.J., Owens L.B., Norton L.D. (1990): Effect of Lumbricus terrestris L. burrows on hydrology of continuous no-till corn fields. Geoderma, 46: 73-84. Go to original source...
    11. Emmerling C. (1995): Long-term effects of inundation dynamics and agricultural land-use on the distribution of soil macrofauna in fluvisols. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 20: 130-136. Go to original source...
    12. Emmerling C., Paulsch D. (2001): Improvement of earthworm (Lumbricidae) community and activity in mine soils from open-cast coal mining by the application of different organic waste materials. Pedobiologia, 45: 396-407. Go to original source...
    13. Eriksen-Hamel N.S., Whalen J.K. (2008): Earthworms, soil mineral nitrogen and forage production in grass-based hayfields. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40: 1004-1010. Go to original source...
    14. Geissen V., Peña-Peña K., Huerta E. (2009): Effects of different land use on soil chemical properties, decomposition rate and earthworm communities in tropical Mexico. Pedobiologia, 53: 75-86. Go to original source...
    15. Hairiah K., Williams S.E., Bignell D., Swift M., Van Noordwijk M. (2001): Effects of land use change on belowground biodiversity. ASB Lecture Note 6A. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Bogor.
    16. Huerta E., Rodriguez-Olan J., Evia-Castillo I., Montejo-Meneses E., De la Cruz-Mondragón M., Garcia-Hernandez R., Uribe S. (2007): Earthworms and soil properties in Tabasco, Mexico. European Journal of Soil Biology, 43: S190-S195. Go to original source...
    17. Lavell P., Bignell D., Lepage M. (1997): Soil function in a changing world: The role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. European Journal of Soil Biology, 33: 159-193.
    18. Leroy B.L.M., Schmidt O., Van den Bossche A., Reheul D., Moens M. (2008): Earthworm population dynamics as influenced by the quality of exogenous organic matter. Pedobiologia, 52: 139-150. Go to original source...
    19. Lowe C.N., Butt K.R. (2002): Influence of organic matter on earthworm production and behaviour: A laboratory-based approach with applications for soil restoration. European Journal of Soil Biology, 38: 173-176. Go to original source...
    20. Lu R.K. (2000): Analysis of Soil Characteristics. China Agricultural Scientech Press, Beijing.
    21. Ouellet G., Lapen D.R., Topp E., Sawada M., Edwards M. (2008): A heuristic model to predict earthworm biomass in agroecosystems based on selected management and soil properties. Applied Soil Ecology, 39: 35-45. Go to original source...
    22. Pathak H., Rao D.L.N. (1998): Carbon and nitrogen mineralization from added organic matter in saline and alkali soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 695-702. Go to original source...
    23. Qiao Y.H., Wu W.L., Xu Q., Chen K. (2001): Relationship between production input and secondary succession of earthworm population in salinity transforming region of North China - A case study in Quzhou county. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 12: 414-416. Go to PubMed...
    24. Raw F. (1959): Estimating earthworm populations by using formalin. Nature, 184: 1661-1662. Go to original source...
    25. Reeleder R.D., Miller J.J., Ball Coelho B.R., Roy R.C. (2006): Impacts of tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen on populations of earthworms, microarthropods, and soil fungi in a cultivated fragile soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 33: 243-257. Go to original source...
    26. Schoeneberger P.J., Wysocki D.A., Benham E.C., Broderson W.D. (2002): Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils. Version 1.1. National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Services. US Department of Agriculture Lincoln, Nebraska.
    27. Sumner M.E. (1995): Sodic soils: new perspectives. In: Naidu R., Sumner M.E., Rengasamy P. (eds.): Australian Sodic Soils: Distribution, Properties and Management. CSIRO, Melbourne, 1-34.
    28. Tao J., Gu W., Griffiths B., Liu X.J., Xu Y.J., Zhang H. (2012): Maize residue application reduces negative effects of soil salinity on the growth and reproduction of the earthworm Aporrectodea trapezoides, in a soil mesocosm experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 49: 46-51. Go to original source...
    29. Wessells M.L.S., Bohlen P.J., McCartney D.A., Subler S., Edwards C.A. (1997): Earthworm effects on soil respiration in corn agroecosystems receiving different nutrient inputs Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29: 409-412. Go to original source...
    30. Whalen J.K., Parmelee R.W., Edwards C.A. (1998): Population dynamics of earthworm communities in corn agroecosystems receiving organic or inorganic fertilizer amendments. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27: 400-407. Go to original source...
    31. Wichern J., Wichern F., Joergensen R.G. (2006): Impact of salinity on soil microbial communities and the decomposition of maize in acidic soils. Geoderma, 137: 100-108. Go to original source...
    32. Wu W.J., Qiao Y.H., Xu Q., Chen K. (2001): An ecological study on earthworm in farmland of salinity transforming area in North China Plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21: 1109-1113.
    33. Yin W.Y. (1992): China Subtropical Soil Animal. Science Press, Beijing.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content