Plant Soil Environ., 2017, 63(6):264-270 | DOI: 10.17221/171/2017-PSE

Microbial community diversity and the interaction of soil under maize growth in different cultivation techniquesOriginal Paper

Anna GA£¡ZKA*,1, Karolina GAWRYJO£EK1, Jaros³aw GRZ¡DZIEL1, Magdalena FR¡C2, Jerzy KSIʯAK3
1 Department of Agriculture Microbiology, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation - State Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland
2 Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland
3 Department of Forage Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation - State Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland

Soil microbial functional diversity under maize grown in different agricultural management practices was determined using the Biolog EcoPlates and other microbial and biochemical methods. Comparisons of substrate utilization and the diversity indices showed differences in community composition of microorganisms related to different cultivation techniques and seasons. The soil samples collected in spring were characterized by statistically significant lower indices of biological activity in comparison to the soil collected from the flowering stage of maize. The soils collected in spring from the plots with full tillage had a similarly high biological activity as the soils obtained from maize flowering season. The principal component of PC analysis, showed the strong correlation between the parameters of soil quality and biodiversity indicators. Selected indicators of soil microbial diversity explained 71.51% of biological variability in soils. Based on the PC analysis, two major groups of soils have been indicated. Management practices and seasons were two important factors affecting soil microbial communities.

Keywords: Zea mays; monoculture; community level physiological profiles; bioindicators; cultivation practices

Published: June 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
GA£¡ZKA A, GAWRYJO£EK K, GRZ¡DZIEL J, FR¡C M, KSIʯAK J. Microbial community diversity and the interaction of soil under maize growth in different cultivation techniques. Plant Soil Environ. 2017;63(6):264-270. doi: 10.17221/171/2017-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Bowles T.M., Acosta-Martínez V., Calderón F., Jackson L.E. (2014): Soil enzyme activities, microbial communities, and carbon and nitrogen availability in organic agroecosystems across an intensively-managed agricultural landscape. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68: 252-262. Go to original source...
  2. Fenglerowa W. (1965): Simple method for counting Azotobacter in soil samples. Acta Microbiological Polonum, 14: 203-206.
  3. Fr±c M., Oszust K., Lipiec J. (2012): Community level physiological profiles (CLPP), characterization and microbial activity of soil amended with dairy sewage sludge. Sensors, 12: 3253-3268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ga³±zka A., Gawryjo³ek K., Perzyñski A., Ga³±zka R., Ksiê¿ak J. (2017): Changes in enzymatic activities and microbial communities in soil under long-term maize monoculture and crop rotation. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26: 39-46. Go to original source...
  5. Garland J.L., Millis A.L. (1991): Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57: 2351-2359. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Ghani A., Dexter M., Perrott K.W. (2003): Hot-water extractable carbon in soils: A sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilization, grazing and cultivation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35: 1231-1243. Go to original source...
  7. Ghimire R., Norton J.B., Stahl P.D., Norton U. (2014): Soil microbial substrate properties and microbial community responses under irrigated organic and reduced-tillage crop and forage production systems. PLoS ONE 9: e103901. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Järvan M., Edesi L., Adamson A., Võsa T. (2014): Soil microbial communities and dehydrogenase activity depending on farming systems. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60: 459-463. Go to original source...
  9. Martin J.P. (2003): Use of acid, rose Bengal, and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Science, 69: 215-232. Go to original source...
  10. Ngosong C., Jarosch M., Raupp J., Neumann E., Ruess L. (2010): The impact of farming practice on soil microorganisms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Crop type versus long-term mineral and organic fertilization. Applied Soil Ecology, 46: 134-142. Go to original source...
  11. Rillig M.C. (2004): Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters, 7: 740-754. Go to original source...
  12. Rodina A. (1968): Microbiological Methods for the Study of Water. Pañstwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Le¶ne, Warszawa. (In Polish)
  13. Scherer H.W., Metker D.J., Welp G. (2011): Effect of long-term organic amendments on chemical and microbial properties of a luvisol. Plant, Soil and Environment, 57: 513-518. Go to original source...
  14. Spedding T.A., Hamel C., Mehuys G.R., Madramootoo C.A. (2004): Soil microbial dynamics in maize-growing soil under different tillage and residue management systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36: 499-512. Go to original source...
  15. Tabatabai M.A. (1982): Soil enzymes. In: Page A.L., Miller R.H., Keeney D.R. (eds.): Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Madison, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America. Go to original source...
  16. Wright S.F., Franke-Snyder M., Morton J.B., Upadhyaya A. (1996): Time-course study and partial characterization of a protein on hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during active colonization of roots. Plant and Soil, 181: 193-203. Go to original source...
  17. Zhang B., He H.B., Ding X.L., Zhang X.D., Zhang X.-P., Yang X.M., Filley T.R. (2012): Soil microbial community dynamics over a maize (Zea mays L.) growing season under conventional- and no-tillage practices in a rainfed agroecosystem. Soil and Tillage Research, 124: 153-160. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.