Plant Soil Environ., 2017, 63(9):428-434 | DOI: 10.17221/482/2017-PSE

Are intensification and winter wheat yield increase efficient?Original Paper

Jan KŘEN*,1, Martin HOUŠŤ1, Ludvík TVARŮŽEK2, Zdeněk JERGL2
1 Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic

The results of small-plot field trials of international comparisons of a series of crop management practices for winter wheat grown during 2014-2016 on fertile soils of Central Moravia were assessed. The objective of the experiments was to obtain the highest gross margin (GM), which is the difference between revenues and direct costs. The analyses showed that an optimal level of inputs and costs for obtaining the highest GM could exist. In the assessed series of crop management practices, the optimum input costs corresponded to 11 000-12 000 CZK/ha and 6-9 input measures. At high levels of grains (above 10 t/ha), higher values of GM were obtained by increased efficiency of inputs, but not by increasing their amount to maximize the yields. This indicates the multifunctional and synergic effects of production factors, which can be used at the so-called ecological intensification. Optimizations of inputs can be obtained rather by crop protection than by crop nutrition, which means rather in protection of high yields than in their maximization. Under field conditions, soil and plant processes affected by weather cannot be controlled. Therefore, optimisation of production factors is based both on scientific findings and practical agronomic experience. That is why a universal crop management practice with increased economic and ecological effects cannot be practically proposed.

Keywords: optimisation of crop management; ecological intensification; cost of crop nutrition and protection; grain quality

Published: September 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
KŘEN J, HOUŠŤ M, TVARŮŽEK L, JERGL Z. Are intensification and winter wheat yield increase efficient? Plant Soil Environ. 2017;63(9):428-434. doi: 10.17221/482/2017-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Brisson N., Gate P., Gouache D., Charmet G., Oury F.-X., Huard F. (2010): Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France. Field Crops Research, 119: 201-212. Go to original source...
  2. Bryan B.A., King G., Zhao G. (2014): Influence of management and environment on Australian wheat: Information for sustainable intensification and closing yield gaps. Environmental Research Letters, 9: 0444005, 12. Available at http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/9/4/044005 Go to original source...
  3. Cassman K.G. (1999): Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96: 5952-5959. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Doré T., Makowski D., Malézieux E., Munier-Jolain N., Tchamitchain M., Tittonell M. (2011): Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy, 34: 197-210. Go to original source...
  5. Gasson R. (1973): Goals and values of farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24: 521-542. Go to original source...
  6. Loyce C., Meynard J.M., Bouchard C., Rolland B., Lonnet P., Bataillon P., Bernicot M.H., Bonnefoy M., Charrier X., Debote B., Demarquet T., Duperrier B., Félix I., Heddadj D., Leblanc O., Leleu M., Mangin P., Méausoone M., Doussinault G. (2012): Growing winter wheat cultivars under different management intensities in France: A multicriteria assessment based on economic, energetic and environmental indicators. Field Crops Research, 125: 167-178. Go to original source...
  7. Meynard J.M., Girardin Ph. (1991): Produce otherwise. Le courrier de l´environnement de l´INRA, 15: 1-19. Available at: http://www.inra.fr/dpenv/meynac15.htm (In French)
  8. Naunheim H.P., Ortseifen U. (2016): Wheat yield initiative: There's something else! Getreide Magazin, 1: 70-72. (In German)
  9. Petersen J., Haastrup M., Knudsen L., Olesen J.E. (2010): Causes of yield stagnation in winter wheat in Denamark. DJF Report Plant Science, 147: 149.
  10. Pretty J., Bharucha Z.P. (2014): Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Annals of Botany, 114: 1571-1596. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Roßberg R. (2010): Yield was not decisive. DLG-Mitteilungen, 12: 94-97. (In German)
  12. Roßberg R. (2017): DLG wheat comparison. The results of Haßfurt. DLG-Mitteilungen, 3. Available at: http://www.dlg-mitteilungen.de/mediathek/downloads (In German)
  13. Stoate C., Báldi A., Beja P., Boatman N.D., Herzon I., van Doorn A., de Snoo G.R., Rakosy L., Ramwell C. (2009): Ecological impacts of early 21 st century agricultural change in Europe - A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 22-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Sumberg J. (2012): Mind the (yield) gap(s). Food Security, 4: 509-518. Go to original source...
  15. Wright B.D. (2011): The economics of grain price volatility. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33: 32-58. Go to original source...
  16. Alhemeyer J., Friedt W. (2012): Winter wheat yields in Germany are stable at a high level. Getreidemagazin, 6: 38-41. (In German)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.