Plant Soil Environ., 2017, 63(12):552-557 | DOI: 10.17221/639/2017-PSE

The productivity of two yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) cultivars as an effect of different farming systemsOriginal Paper

Grażyna SZYMAŃSKA*, Agnieszka FALIGOWSKA, Katarzyna PANASIEWICZ, Jerzy SZUKAŁA, Wiesław KOZIARA
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agronomy and Bioengineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

Between 2011 and 2015, a two-factor field experiment on yellow lupine was conducted in Gorzyń, Poland (52°34'07''N, 15°54'33''E). The first-order factor was the farming technology: low-input (LI; without fertilization and chemical protection); medium-input (MI; medium level of fertilization and chemical protection) and high-input (CONV; high level of fertilization and chemical protection). The second-order factor was the cultivar (indeterminate cv. Mister and determinate cv. Perkoz). The research assessed the productive and economic effects of two yellow lupine cultivars grown in different farming systems. The weather conditions significantly influenced the yield in consecutive years of the research. A change from the LI farming system to the MI and CONV systems increased the seed yield by 13.1% and 22.0%, respectively. The research also showed differences in the yield of the cultivars under study. The indeterminate cv. Mister yielded more seeds than the determinate cv. Perkoz (1.95 t/ha vs 1.81 t/ha). The research also showed that when the EU subsidies were added, the value of production increased along with the cultivation intensity. However, an increase in the outlay on industrial means of production in higher-intensity technologies caused a decrease in the gross agricultural income value.

Keywords: legumes; weed infestation; intensification of cultivation technologies; profitability

Published: December 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SZYMAŃSKA G, FALIGOWSKA A, PANASIEWICZ K, SZUKAŁA J, KOZIARA W. The productivity of two yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) cultivars as an effect of different farming systems. Plant Soil Environ. 2017;63(12):552-557. doi: 10.17221/639/2017-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Atkins C.A., Smith P.M. (2004): Regulation of pod set and seed development in lupin. In: van Santen E., Hill G.D. (eds.): Proceedings of the 10 th International Lupin Conference, 19-24. June 2002, New Zealand, 275-278.
  2. Bhardwaj H.L., Hamama A.A., van Santen E. (2004): White lupin performance and nutritional value as affected by planting date and row spacing. Agronomy Journal, 96: 580-583. Go to original source...
  3. Bieniaszewski T., Podleśny J., Olszewski J., Stanek M., Horoszkiewicz M. (2012): The response of indeterminate and determinate yellow lupin varieties to different plant density. Fragmenta Agronomica, 29: 7-20. (In Polish)
  4. Borowska M., Prusinski J., Kaszkowiak E. (2015): Production results of intensification of cultivation technologies in three lupin (Lupinus L.) species. Plant, Soil and Environment, 61: 426-431. Go to original source...
  5. Czerwińska-Kayzer D., Florek J. (2012): Profitability of selected legumes. Fragmenta Agronomica, 29: 36-44. (In Polish)
  6. Faligowska A., Panasiewicz K., Szymańska G., Szukała J., Koziara W., Pszczółkowska A. (2017): Productivity of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) as an effect of diversified farming systems. Legume Research, 40: 872-877. Go to original source...
  7. Faligowska A., Szukała J. (2015): The effect of various long-term tillage systems on yield and yield component of yellow and narrow-leaved lupin. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 20: 188-193. Go to original source...
  8. Jaśkiewicz B. (2017): The impact of production technology on yields of spring triticale under varied percentages of cereals to total cropped area. Fragmenta Agronomica, 34: 7-17. (In Polish)
  9. Pelzer E., Bazot M., Makowski D., Corre-Hellou G., Naudin C., Al Rifaï M., Baranger E., Bedoussac L., Biarnès V., Boucheny P., Carrouée B., Dorvillez D., Foissy D., Gaillard B., Guichard L., Mansard M.-C., Omon B., Prieur L., Yvergniaux M., Justes E., Jeuffroy M.-H. (2012): Pea-wheat intercrops in low-input conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts. European Journal of Agronomy, 40: 39-53. Go to original source...
  10. Podleśna A., Podleśny J., Doroszewski A. (2014): Usefulness of selected weather indices to evaluation of yellow lupine yielding possibility. Agricultural Water Management, 146: 201-207. Go to original source...
  11. Prusiński J., Kaszkowiak E., Borowska M. (2008): Effect of intensity of the cultivation technology on yield and on seed plumpness and cooking time of chosen field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura, 7: 81-91.
  12. Reckling M., Bergkvist G., Watson C.A., Stoddard F.L., Zander P.M., Walker R.L., Pristeri A., Toncea I., Bachinger J. (2016): Trade-offs between economic and environmental impacts of introducing legumes into cropping systems. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 669-683. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. SAS Institute (1999): SAS/STAT User's Guide. 7 th Edition. Cary.
  14. Voisin A.-S., Guéguen J., Huyghe C., Jeuffroy M.-H., Magrini M.-B., Meynard J.-M., Mougel C., Pellerin S., Pelzer E. (2014): Legumes for feed, food, biomaterials and bioenergy in Europe: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34: 361-380. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.