Plant Soil Environ., 2018, 64(3):102-107 | DOI: 10.17221/765/2017-PSE

Response of Avena sativa L. and the soil microbiota to the contamination of soil with Shell diesel oilOriginal Paper

Agata BOROWIK, Jadwiga WYSZKOWSKA*
Department of Microbiology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

This study analysed the changes in the development of Avena sativa L. cultivated on soil contaminated with diesel oil (DO; 0, 7, 14 and 21 mL/kg of soil dry matter), and in the microbiological, biochemical, chemical and physico-chemical properties of the soil. In addition to basic fertilisation fulfilling the nutritional needs of the oat plant, finely ground barley straw and finely ground charcoal was also applied. The study revealed a highly toxic effect of DO on the growth and development of Avena sativa L. The uptake of macro- and micronutrients by the tested plant decreased significantly. The active bacteria were identified based on the analysis of 16S rRNA coding sequences. In objects contaminated with DO, a more rapid development of organotrophic bacteria, actinomyces and fungi was observed, as well as higher activity of dehydrogenases, catalase, urease, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and β-glucosidase. In the soils contaminated with DO, more Corg and available and exchangeable potassium were found than in the non-contaminated soils. DO did not have such a significant effect on the contents of other elements in the soil. The use of charcoal and straw stimulated both the development of microorganisms and the activity of soil enzymes, yet it did not mitigate the adverse effect of DO on the growth or development of the oat plant.

Keywords: petroleum product; pollution; biomonitoring; toxic elements; physico-chemical properties of soil; biostimulation

Published: March 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BOROWIK A, WYSZKOWSKA J. Response of Avena sativa L. and the soil microbiota to the contamination of soil with Shell diesel oil. Plant Soil Environ. 2018;64(3):102-107. doi: 10.17221/765/2017-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Borowik A., Wyszkowska J., Wyszkowski M. (2017): Resistance of aerobic microorganisms and soil enzyme response to soil contamination with Ekodiesel Ultra fuel. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 24: 24346-24363. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. De Leij F.A.A.M., Whipps J.M., Lynch J.M. (1994): The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots. Microbial Ecology, 27: 81-97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Fatima K., Afzal M., Imran A., Khan Q.M. (2015): Bacterial rhizosphere and endosphere populations associated with grasses and trees to be used for phytoremediation of crude oil contaminated soil. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 94: 314-320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Hawrot-Paw M., B±kowska T. (2014): Growth and development of selected plant species in the phytoremediation of diesel oil contaminated soil. Environment Protection Engineering, 40: 5-13. http://www.epc.shell.com Go to original source...
  5. Khalilova H.Kh. (2015): The impact of oil contamination on soil ecosystem. Biological and Chemical Research, 2015: 133-139.
  6. Kosiorek M., Modrzewska B., Wyszkowski M. (2016): Levels of selected trace elements in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), silver birch (Betula pendula L.), and Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) in an urbanized environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188: 598. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Kucharski J., Jastrzêbska E. (2005): Effects of heating oil on the count of microorganisms and physico-chemical properties of soil. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 14: 189-198.
  8. Kumari B., Singh D.P. (2016): A review on multifaceted application of nanoparticles in the field of bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Ecological Engineering, 97: 98-105. Go to original source...
  9. Kuppusamy S., Thavamani P., Venkateswarlu K., Lee Y.B., Naidu R., Megharaj M. (2017): Remediation approaches for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soils: Technological constraints, emerging trends and future directions. Chemosphere, 168: 944-968. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Margesin R., Schinner F. (1997): Efficiency of indigenous and inoculated cold-adapted soil microorganisms for biodegradation of diesel oil in alpine soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63: 2660-2664. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Martínez Álvarez L.M., Lo Balbo A., Mac Cormack W.P., Ruberto L.A.M. (2015): Bioremediation of a petroleum hydrocarboncontaminated Antarctic soil: Optimization of a biostimulation strategy using response-surface methodology (RSM). Cold Regions Science and Technology, 119: 61-67. Go to original source...
  12. Masy T., Demanèche S., Tromme O., Thonart P., Jacques P., Hiligsmann S., Vogel T.M. (2016): Hydrocarbon biostimulation and bioaugmentation in organic carbon and clay-rich soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 99: 66-74. Go to original source...
  13. Meckenstock R.U., Boll M., Mouttaki H., Koelschbach J.S., Tarouco P.C., Weyrauch P., Dong X., Himmelberg A.M. (2016): Anaerobic degradation of benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 26: 92-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Ramadass K., Megharaj M., Venkateswarlu K., Naidu R. (2017): Ecotoxicity of measured concentrations of soil-applied diesel: Effects on earthworm survival, dehydrogenase, urease and nitrification activities. Applied Soil Ecology, 119: 1-7. Go to original source...
  15. Rusin M., Gospodarek J., Nadgórska-Socha A. (2015): The effect of petroleum-derived substances on the growth and chemical composition of Vicia faba L. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24: 2157-2166. Go to original source...
  16. Sivitskaya V., Wyszkowski M. (2013): Changes in the content of some macroelements in maize (Zea mays L.) under effect of fuel oil after application of different substances to soil. Journal of Elementology, 18: 705-714.
  17. Statsoft, Inc., Statistica (2015): Data Analysis Software System. (version 12.5) Available at: www.statsoft.com
  18. Vázquez S., Nogales B., Ruberto L., Mestre C., Christie-Oleza J., Ferrero M., Bosch R., Mac Cormack W.P. (2013): Characterization of bacterial consortia from diesel-contaminated Antarctic soils: Towards the design of tailored formulas for bioaugmentation. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 77: 22-30. Go to original source...
  19. Wu B., Lan T., Lu D., Liu Z. (2014): Ecological and enzymatic responses to petroleum contamination. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, 16: 1501-1509. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Wyszkowska J., Kucharski M., Kucharski J. (2006): Application of the activity of soil enzymes in the evaluation of soil contamination by diesel oil. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 15: 501-506.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.