Plant Soil Environ., 2018, 64(8):367-378 | DOI: 10.17221/274/2018-PSE

Water demands and biomass production of sorghum and maize plants in areas with insufficient precipitation in Central EuropeOriginal Paper

Michaela ŠKEŘÍKOVÁ*,1, Václav BRANT1, Milan KROULÍK2, Jan PIVEC1, Petr ZÁBRANSKÝ1, Josef HAKL1, Michael HOFBAUER1
1 Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Evapotranspiration and transpiration measurements represent a tool for the assessment of crop water demand. The aim of this study was to compare sorghum and maize with respect to its potential for forage production in areas with insufficient precipitation in Central Europe. The values of the actual evapotranspiration (ETa, Bowen ratio balance method), transpiration (sap flow method), leaf area index (LAI) and biomass production of sorghum and maize were measured continuously in years 2010-2012. Sorghum stand provided higher ETa in comparison with maize in dry year 2012. Maize produced consistently more above-ground biomass yield and lower LAI over all evaluated years than sorghum. The sorghum provided similar or higher water use efficiency (WUE) than maize during the period of intensive prolongation growth, however, the higher WUE did not result in higher biomass production.

Keywords: Sorghum bicolor L. Moench; Zea mays L.; water stress; arid area; rainfall

Published: August 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ŠKEŘÍKOVÁ M, BRANT V, KROULÍK M, PIVEC J, ZÁBRANSKÝ P, HAKL J, HOFBAUER M. Water demands and biomass production of sorghum and maize plants in areas with insufficient precipitation in Central Europe. Plant Soil Environ. 2018;64(8):367-378. doi: 10.17221/274/2018-PSE.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raies D., Smith M. (1998): Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome, United Nations.
    2. Bethenod O., Katerji N., Goujet R., Bertolini J.M., Rana G. (2000): Determination and validation of corn crop transpiration by sap flow measurement under field conditions. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 67: 153-160. Go to original source...
    3. Brant V., Zábranský P., Škeříková M., Pivec J., Kroulík M., Procházka L. (2017): Effect of row width on splash erosion and throughfall in silage maize crops. Soil and Water Research, 12: 39-50. Go to original source...
    4. Brant V., Pivec J., Zábranský P., Hakl J. (2012): Water consumption by Asteraceae weeds under field conditions. Weed Biology and Management, 12: 71-83. Go to original source...
    5. Brant V., Zábranský P., Hamouzová K., Fuksa P. (2011): Germination of sorghum seeds under condition of water deficit. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, 128-134.
    6. Cohen Y., Huck M.G., Hesketh J.D., Frederick J.R. (1990): Sap flow in the stem of water stressed soybean and maize plants. Irrigation Science, 11: 45-50. Go to original source...
    7. Downes R.W. (1970): Effect of light intensity and leaf temperature on photosynthesis and transpiration in wheat and sorghum. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 23: 775-782. Go to original source...
    8. Fuksa P., Hakl J., Kocourková D., Veselá M. (2004): Influence of weed infestation on morphological parameters of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant, Soil and Environment, 50: 371-378. Go to original source...
    9. Garofalo P., Rinaldi M. (2013): Water-use efficiency of irrigated biomass sorghum in a Mediterranean environment. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11: 1153-1169. Go to original source...
    10. Gavloski J.E., Ellis C.R., Whitfield G.H. (1992): Effect of restricted watering on sap flow and growth in corn (Zea mays L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 72: 361-368. Go to original source...
    11. Hao B.Z., Xue Q.W., Bean B.W., Rooney W.L., Becker J.D. (2014): Biomass production, water and nitrogen use efficiency in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum in the Texas High Plains. Biomass and Bioenergy, 62: 108-116. Go to original source...
    12. Hermuth J., Kosová K. (2017): Characterization of the first Czech sorghum variety Ruzrok tested in Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 53: 37-44. Go to original source...
    13. Hooghart J.C. (1971): Evaporation and Weather. TNO Committee of Hydrological Research, Technical Meeting 44. In: Proceedings and Information No. 39, The Hague, TNO.
    14. Howell T.A., Steiner J.L., Schneider A.D., Evett S.R., Tolk J.A. (1994): Evapotranspiration of irrigated winter wheat, sorghum, and corn. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2048-2081.
    15. Kato T., Kamichika M. (2006): Determination of a crop coefficient for evapotranspiration in a sparse sorghum field. Irrigation and Drainage, 55: 165-175. Go to original source...
    16. Kjelgaard J.F., Stockle C.O., Black R.A., Campbell G.S. (1997): Measuring sap flow with the heat balance approach using constant and variable heat inputs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 85: 239-250. Go to original source...
    17. Kučera J., Čermák J., Penka M. (1977): Improved thermal method of continual recording the transpiration flow rate dynamics. Biologia Plantarum, 19: 413-420. Go to original source...
    18. Lobell D.B., Roberts M.J., Schlenker W., Braun N., Little B.B., Rejesus R.M., Graeme L. (2014): Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the U.S. Midwest. Science, 344: 516-519. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Moroke T.S., Schwartz R.C., Brown K.W., Juo A.S.R. (2005): Soil water depletion and root distribution of three dryland crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69: 197-205. Go to original source...
    20. Ort D.R., Long S.P. (2014): Limits on yields in the Corn Belt. Science, 344: 484-485. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Pan G., Ouyang Z., Luo Q., Yu Q., Wang J. (2011): Water use patterns of forage cultivars in the North China Plain. International Journal of Plant Production, 5: 181-194.
    22. Pivec J., Brant V., Bečka D., Cihlář P. (2011): Consumptive use of water in Brassica napus L. from flowering to ripening stage under the rainless region conditions. Irrigation and Drainage, 60: 493-498. Go to original source...
    23. Pivec J., Brant V., Moravec D. (2006): Analysis of the potential evapotranspiration demands in the Czech Republic between 1961-1990. Biologia, 61: S294-S299. Go to original source...
    24. Rosenow D.T., Quisenberry J.E., Wendt C.W., Clark L.E. (1983): Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agricultural Water Management, 7: 207-222. Go to original source...
    25. Rooney W.L., Blumenthal J., Bean B., Mullet J.E. (2007): Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 1: 147-157. Go to original source...
    26. Sanchez-Diaz M.F., Kramer P.J. (1971): Behaviour of corn and sorghum under water stress and during recovery. Plant Physiology, 48: 613-616. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Saseendran S.A., Trout T.J., Ahuja L.R., Ma L., McMaster G.S., Nielsen D.C., Andales A.A., Chávez J.L., Ham J. (2015): Quantifying crop water stress factors from soil water measurements in a limited irrigation experiment. Agricultural Systems, 137: 191-205. Go to original source...
    28. Schittenhelm S., Schroetter S. (2014): Comparison of drought tolerance of maize, sweet sorghum and sorghum - Sudangrass hybrids. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 200: 46-53. Go to original source...
    29. Sun H.Y., Shen Y.J., Yu Q., Flerchinger G.N., Zhang Y.Q., Liu C.M., Zhang X.Y. (2010): Effect of precipitation change on water balance and WUE of the winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 1139-1145. Go to original source...
    30. Tatarinov F.A., Kučera J., Cienciala E. (2005): The analysis of physical background of tree sap flow measurement based on thermal methods. Measurement Science and Technology, 16: 1157-1169. Go to original source...
    31. Tetens V.O. (1930): Über einige meteorologische Begriffe. Zeit schrift für Geophysik, 6: 297-309.
    32. Timlin D.J., Fleisher D.H., Kemanian A.R., Reddy V.R. (2014): Plant density and leaf area index effects on the distribution of light transmittance to the soil surface in maize. Agronomy Journal, 106: 1828-1837. Go to original source...
    33. Tolk J.A., Howell T.A. (2003): Water use efficiencies of grain sorghum grown in the three USA southern Great Plains soils. Agricultural Water Management, 59: 97-111. Go to original source...
    34. Woodward F.I., Sheehy J.E. (1983): Principles and Measurements in Environmental Biology. London, Butterworth & Co, Ltd.
    35. Yimam Y.T., Ochsner T.E., Kakani V.G. (2015): Evapotranspiration partitioning and water use efficiency of switchgrass and biomass sorghum managed for biofuel. Agricultural Water Management, 155: 40-47. Go to original source...
    36. Zábranský P., Pivec J., Brant V., Kroulík M., Škeříková M. (2015): The values of crop coefficients and Bowen ratio of field crops in areas with insufficient precipitation in central Europe. Irrigation and Drainage, 64: 253-262. Go to original source...
    37. Zegada-Lizarazu W., Zatta A., Monti A. (2012): Water uptake efficiency and above- and belowground biomass development of sweet sorghum and maize under different water regimes. Plant and Soil, 351: 47-60. Go to original source...
    38. Zhang J., Kirkham M.B. (1995): Sap flow in a dicotyledon (sunflower) and a monocotyledon (sorghum) by the heat-balance method. Agronomy Journal, 87: 1106-1114. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content