Plant Soil Environ., 2021, 67(9):499-506 | DOI: 10.17221/228/2021-PSE

Is Mehlich 3 soil extraction a suitable screening method for determination of some risk elements?Original Paper

Stanislav Malý, Jiří Zbíral*, Eva Čižmárová
Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, National Reference Laboratory, Brno, Czech Republic

Legislation limits for risk elements (As, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, V, Zn) in agricultural soil in the Czech Republic are given for the content of elements extracted by aqua regia. This extraction is time consuming and environmentally unfriendly. The regular soil survey is based on Mehlich 3 universal soil extractant and covers the simultaneous determination of macronutrients, sulphur, and micronutrients by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Our study focused on the possibility to use Mehlich 3 extractant also for preliminary screening for the determination of the risk elements simultaneously with the other elements by the ICP-OES method. Mehlich 3 was confirmed as a reliable screening method for Cd regarding sensitivity, specificity and precision (> 0.8) when the cut-off value of 0.27 mg/kg in Mehlich 3 extracts was used for the prediction of soils to be above or below the legislation limit, which in turn is based on aqua regia extraction. Very good results were obtained for Be and promising results were received for As, Cu and V. But the available data were not sufficient for the determination of reliable cut-off values for Co, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn.

Keywords: soil contamination; heavy metals; cut-off values; cadmium; statistical learning

Published: September 30, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Malý S, Zbíral J, Čižmárová E. Is Mehlich 3 soil extraction a suitable screening method for determination of some risk elements? Plant Soil Environ. 2021;67(9):499-506. doi: 10.17221/228/2021-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Eckert D.J., Watson M.E. (1996): Integrating the Mehlich-3 extractant into existing soil test interpretation schemes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 27: 1237-1249. Go to original source...
  2. Henry L., Wickham H. (2020): purrr: Functional Programming Tools. R package version 0.3.4.
  3. Irizarry R.A. (2019): Introduction to Data Science. Data Analysis and Prediction Algorithms with R. 1st Edition. Boca Raton, Chapman and Hall/CRC. Go to original source...
  4. Klement V., Smatanová M., Trávník K. (2012): Fifty Years of Agrochemical Testing of Agriculture Soils in the Czech Republic. Brno, Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture. ISBN 978-80-7401-062-0
  5. Kulhánek M., Černý J., Balík J., Sedlář O., Suran P. (2018): Potential of Mehlich 3 method for extracting plant available sulfur in the Czech agricultural soils. Plant, Soil and Environment, 64: 455-462. Go to original source...
  6. Mehlich A. (1984): Mehlich 3 soil test extractant. A modification of the Mehlich 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 15: 1409-1416. Go to original source...
  7. Minca K.K., Basta N.T., Scheckel K.G. (2013): Using the Mehlich-3 soil test as an inexpensive screening tool to estimate total and bioaccessible lead in urban soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 42: 1518-1526. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Monterroso C., Álvarez-Rodríguez E., Fernández-Marcos M.L. (1999): Evaluation of Mehlich 3 reagent as multielement extractant in mine soils. Land Degradation and Development, 10: 35-47. Go to original source...
  9. Ostatek-Boczynski Z.A., Lee-Steere Peimaneh (2012): Evaluation of Mehlich 3 as a universal nutrient extractant for australian sugarcane soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43: 623-630. Go to original source...
  10. Pradhan A.K., Beura K.S., Das R., Padhan D., Hazra G.C., Mandal B., De N., Mishra V.N., Polara K.B., Sharma S. (2015): Evaluation of extractability of different extractants for zinc and copper in soils under long-term fertilization. Plant, Soil and Environment, 61: 227-233. Go to original source...
  11. Prášková L., Kubík L., Svoboda T. (2020): Register of Contaminated Areas, Total Contents of Risk Elements in Agricultural Soil, Tables, Overviews, Cartograms, 1998-2018. Brno, Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture. (In Czech)
  12. R Core Team (2020): R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, R version 4.0.3.
  13. RStudio Team (2020): RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, RStudio, Inc., RStudio version 1.3.1093.
  14. Sarkar D. (2008): Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R. New York, Springer.
  15. Sims J.T. (1989): Comparison of Mehlich 1 and Mehlich 3 extractants for P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Cu, and Zn in Atlantic coastal plain soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 20: 1707-1726. Go to original source...
  16. Sims J.T., Igo E., Skeans Y. (1999): Comparison of routine soil tests and EPA method 3050 as extractants for heavy metals in Delaware soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 22: 1031-1045. Go to original source...
  17. Vácha R., Sáňka M., Skála J., Čechmánková J., Horváthová V. (2016): Soil contamination health risks in Czech proposal of soil protection legislation, environmental health risk - hazardous factors to living species. In: Marcelo L. (ed.): Larramendy and Sonia Soloneski. Rijeka, IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/62456. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/environmental-healthrisk-hazardous-factors-to-living-species/soil-contaminationhealth-risks-in-czech-proposal-of-soil-protection-legislation Go to original source...
  18. Wendt J.W. (1995): Evaluation of the Mehlich 3 soil extractant for upland Malawi soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 26: 687-702. Go to original source...
  19. Wickham H., François R., Henry L., Müller L. (2020): dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. RStudio, R package version 1.0.2
  20. Wolf A.M., Baker D.E. (1985): Comparisons of soil test phosphorus by Olsen, Bray P1, Mehlich I and Mehlich III methods. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 16: 467-484. Go to original source...
  21. Zbíral J. (2001): Comparison of Extractants for Determination of Nutrients in Soils of the Czech Republic. Brno, Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture. ISBN 80-86051-69-2
  22. Zbíral J. (2016): Determination of plant-available micronutrients by the Mehlich 3 soil extractant - a proposal of critical values. Plant, Soil and Environment, 62: 527-531. Go to original source...
  23. Zbíral J. (ed.) (2016): Soil Analysis I. Standard Operating Procedures. Brno, Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture. ISBN 978-80-7401-123-8
  24. Zbíral J., Smatanová M., Němec P. (2018): Sulphur status in agricultural soils determined using the Mehlich 3 method. Plant, Soil and Environment, 64: 255-259. Go to original source...
  25. Zbíral J., Smatanová M. and et al. (2019): Agrochemical Soil Testing. New Challenges and New Possibilities. Brno, Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture. ISBN 97880-7401-168-9 (In Czech)
  26. Zbíral J., Němec P. (2000): Integrating of Mehlich 3 extractant into the Czech soil testing scheme. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 31: 2171-2182. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.