Plant Soil Environ., 2026, 72(9):515-525

Long-term effects of fertilisation systems on soil nutrient status, soil organic carbon content and crop productivity in a typical Chernozem under different crop rotationsOriginal Paper

Yaroslav Makukh ORCID...1, Svitlana Remeniuk ORCID...1, Vladyslav Riznyk ORCID...1, Snizhana Moshkivska ORCID...1, Tetiana Petrenko ORCID...1, Oleksandr Polovynchuk ORCID...1, Oleh Atamanіuk ORCID...2, Yurii Remeniuk ORCID...3, Ksenia Kopchuk ORCID...4
1 National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet, Kyiv, Ukraine
2 National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet, Bila Tserkva Experimental Breeding Station, Kyiv, Ukraine
3 National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, NSC Institute of Agriculture, Chabany, Fastiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
4 Ivanivka Research and Breading Station, IBCSB, Sumy Region, Okhtyrka, Soniachne, Ukraine

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of fertilisation systems and crop rotation structure on soil nutrient status, organic carbon (OC) content and stocks, and crop productivity in a typical Chernozem. The study was conducted during 2019–2024 as part of a long-term field experiment established in 1976 at the Bila Tserkva Experimental Breeding Station in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Four fertilisation treatments were compared in cereal-fodder-row (CFR) and cereal-row-crop (CRC) rotations: unfertilised since 1976, mineral fertilisation with straw incorporation, mineral + cattle manure fertilisation, and organic fertilisation. Soil mineral N, plant-available P, exchangeable K, OC content, and OC stocks were determined in the 0–30 cm soil layer. Crop yields were assessed for winter wheat, sugar beet and spring barley. The mineral + cattle manure treatment generally maintained favourable soil nutrient conditions and resulted in the highest OC content and stocks in both crop rotations, reaching 1.98% and 70.8 t C/ha in the CFR rotation and 1.77% and 63.2 t C/ha in the CRC rotation. However, the higher nutrient inputs under this treatment did not result in proportionally higher residual availability of all nutrients. Under sugar beet, its clearest post-harvest advantage was observed for soil mineral N, whereas exchangeable K was not consistently higher than under the other fertilised treatments, and plant-available P in the CFR rotation did not differ significantly between the mineral + straw and mineral + cattle manure treatments. The highest mean yields of winter wheat, sugar beet and spring barley were generally obtained under the mineral + cattle manure treatment. Sugar beet root yield reached 46.9 t/ha in the CFR crop rotation and 42.2 t/ha in the CRC rotation, compared with 18.8 and 17.1 t/ha, respectively, in the unfertilised treatments. The results demonstrate that combining organic and mineral nutrient sources with crop residue return and an appropriate crop rotation structure is an effective strategy for maintaining typical Chernozem fertility and sustaining crop productivity under unstable moisture conditions.

Keywords: soil fertility; soil-plant system; long-term experiment; available nutrient reserve; clover; soybean

Received: June 26, 2026; Revised: August 27, 2026; Accepted: August 31, 2026; Prepublished online: September 14, 2026; Published: September 30, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Makukh Y, Remeniuk S, Riznyk V, Moshkivska S, Petrenko T, Polovynchuk O, et al.. Long-term effects of fertilisation systems on soil nutrient status, soil organic carbon content and crop productivity in a typical Chernozem under different crop rotations. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2026;72(9):515-525.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Barłóg P., Grzebisz W. (2025): Potassium and magnesium balance the effect of nitrogen on the yield and quality of sugar beet. Agronomy, 15: 2075. Go to original source...
    2. Barłóg P., Hlisnikovský L., Łukowiak R., Kunzová E. (2025): Soil phosphorus and potassium fractions in response to the long-term application of pig slurry and NPK mineral fertilizers. Agronomy, 15: 1183. Go to original source...
    3. Černý J., Balík J., Kulhánek M., Čásová K., Nedvěd V. (2010): Mineral and organic fertiliza-tion efficiency in long-term stationary experiments. Plant, Soil and Environment, 56: 28-36. Go to original source...
    4. Füllgrabe H., Claassen N., Hilmer R., Koch H.-J. Dittert K., Kreszies T. (2022): Potassium deficiency reduces sugar yield in sugar beet through decreased growth of young plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 185: 545-553. Go to original source...
    5. Giacometti C., Mazzon M., Cavani L., Triberti L., Baldoni G., Ciavatta C., Marzadori C. (2021): Rotation and fertilization effects on soil quality and yields in a long-term field exper-iment. Agronomy, 11: 636. Go to original source...
    6. Götze P., Rücknagel J., Jacobs A., Märländer B., Koch H.J., Holzweißig B., Steinz M., Chris-ten O. (2016): Sugar beet rotation effects on soil organic matter and calculated humus bal-ance in Central Germany. European Journal of Agronomy, 76: 198-207. Go to original source...
    7. Hanhur V., Marenych M., Korotkova I., Gamayunova V., Len O., Marinich L., Olepir R. (2021): Dynamics of nutrients in the soil and spring barley yield depending on the rates of mineral fertilizers. International Journal of Botany Studies, 6: 1298-1306.
    8. Hijbeek R., van Ittersum M.K., Ten Berge H.F.M., Gort G., Spiegel H., Whitmore A.P. (2017): Do organic inputs matter - a meta-analysis of additional yield effects for arable crops in Europe. Plant and Soil, 411: 293-303. Go to original source...
    9. Hlisnikovský L., Menšík L., Křížová K., Kunzová E. (2021): The effect of farmyard manure and mineral fertilizers on sugar beet beetroot and top yield and soil chemical parameters. Agronomy, 11: 133. Go to original source...
    10. Lamlom S.F., Abdelghany A.M., El-Banna A.A.A., El-Manhaly M.M., Elsheikh A.M., Bas-siony N.A.M., Teiba I.I., El-Sorady G.A., Ren H., Ahmad S., Zhang T., Feng G. (2025): Cultivar specific nitrogen and potassium recommendations optimize yield and quality attributes in sugar beet. Scientific Reports, 15: 27550. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Ludwig B., Geisseler D., Michel K., Joergensen R.G., Schulz E., Merbach I., Raupp J., Rauber R., Hu K., Niu L., Liu X. (2011): Effects of fertilization and soil management on crop yields and carbon stabilization in soils. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31: 361-372. Go to original source...
    12. Mühlbachová G., Kusá H., Růžek P., Káš M., Vavera R. (2025): Soil nutrient contents in a long-term field experiment following the suspension of phosphorus and potassium fertilisa-tion. Plant Soil and Environment, 71: 770-781. Go to original source...
    13. Šimon T., Madaras M., Mayerová M., Kunzová E. (2024): Soil organic carbon dynamics in the long-term field experiments with contrasting crop rotations. Agriculture, 14: 818. Go to original source...
    14. Smith P., Soussana J.-F., Angers D., Schipper L., Chenu C., Rasse D.P., Batjes N.H., van Egmond F., McNeill S., Kuhnert M., Arias-Navarro C., Olesen J.E., Chirinda N., Fornara D., Wollenberg E., Álvaro-Fuentes J., Sanz-Cobena A., Klumpp K. (2024): Status of the world's soils. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 49: 73-104. Go to original source...
    15. Suwara I., Pawlak-Zaręba K., Gozdowski D., Młynek S. (2025): Chemical properties of soil after over 55 years of differentiated fertilization and crop rotation. Soil Science Annual, 76: 213837. Go to original source...
    16. Yang X., Xiong J., Du T., Ju X., Gan Y., Li S., Xia L., Shen Y., Pacenka S., Steenhuis T.S., Sid-dique K.H.M., Kang S., Butterbach-Bahl K. (2024): Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health. Nature Communications, 15: 198. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content