Plant Soil Environ., 2003, 49(6):261-268 | DOI: 10.17221/4123-PSE

Comparison of quality parameters of Czech and foreign hop varieties

K. Krofta
Hop Research Institute Co., Ltd, ®atec, Czech Republic

Market varieties of hops are classified to several groups according to their use in the brewing industry - aroma, bitter (dual-purpose), high-alpha ones. Saaz and other genetically related varieties form a separate group among the aromatic hops. The group called fine aroma hops has a low content of a-bitter acids (3-4% w/w), its content of b-bitter acids is in the range of 4-7% w/w and cohumulone ratio in the interval of 23-26% rel. The composition of hop oils is characterised by the content of b-farnesene in the range of 15-20% rel. and trans-a-bergamotene at the amount of ca. 1% rel. Most market varieties of hops are of hybrid origin. It holds true about the Czech varieties Sládek, Bor, Premiant and Agnus. The content of a-bitter acids in bitter varieties is in the range of 7-10% w/w while the content of a-bitter acids in high-alpha hops is higher than 10% w/w.

Keywords: hop varieties; hop resins; hop oils; a-bitter acids; b-bitter acids

Published: June 30, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krofta K. Comparison of quality parameters of Czech and foreign hop varieties. Plant Soil Environ. 2003;49(6):261-268. doi: 10.17221/4123-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Forster A., Schmidt R. (1993): Zur Charakterisierung und Gruppierung von Hopfensorten. Brauwelt, 40: 2036-2057.
  2. Green G., Osborne P. (1993): Rapid method for obtaining essential oil from hops. J. Inst. Brew., 99: 335-339. Go to original source...
  3. Haunold A. (1988): Detailed explanation by Al Haunold of triploid hop breeding program. Brew. Dig., 63: 40-41.
  4. Krofta K., Nesvadba V. (2002): Agnus, first high-alpha hop variety. Kvas. Prům., 48: 239-243. (In Czech) Go to original source...
  5. Maier J. (1995): Hops and beer - brewing trials with new hop varieties. Proc. Sci. Comm. IHGC, Strasburg: 3-9.
  6. Nesvadba V. (2001): New hop variety Agnus. Chmelařství, 51: 155-158. (In Czech)
  7. Neve R.A. (1991): Hops. Chapman and Hall, London.
  8. Seefelder S. et al. (2000): Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship among accessions of hop, Humulus lupulus, as determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting compared with pedigree data. Plant Breed., 119: 257-263. Go to original source...
  9. Vent L., Vent J. (1999): Groups of hop varieties and their utilisation in brewing industry. Kvas. Prům., 45: 335-337. (In Czech)
  10. Wright R.G., Connery F. (1951): Studies of hop quality. Proc. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem.: 87-101. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.