Plant Soil Environ., 2003, 49(10):466-472 | DOI: 10.17221/4158-PSE

The effect of different soil core samplers on precision of estimating weed seedbank in soil

V. Smutný, J. Křen
1 Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Czech Republic
2 Agricultural Research Institute Kroměříž, Ltd., Czech Republic

The effect of different soil sampling procedures on the precision of estimating the weed seedbank in soil using three soil core samplers with a circular base of 1.3, 6.4 and 8.0 cmin diameter was studied in a model experiment. The results showed the importance of a methodological approach. The soil sampler with a larger diameter is more useful for the objective assessment of the species spectrum (detection of seeds of all weed species in the soil). Furthermore, the value of the coefficient of variation (vx) decreases along with the increasing diameter of the soil sampler. The value of vx assessed in partial samples taken with a sampler of 1.3 cm diameter was double to three times higher than for soil samplers of 6.4 and 8.0 cm. The value of vx increased in individual weed species at decreasing seed frequency in individual partial samples from 17.82 to 316.23%. The soil core with the diameter of8.0 cm on the area of1 m2 is optimal for the exact research. To estimate the weed seedbank in soil in small-plot experiments, one partial sample on the area of5 m2 is recommended. To obtain comparable results, it is necessary to take a higher number of samples at a decreasing diameter of the soil sampler. Likewise, a larger amount of samples is needed to detect less abundant species.

Keywords: weed seedbank in soil; soil sampling; precision of estimating

Published: October 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Smutný V, Křen J. The effect of different soil core samplers on precision of estimating weed seedbank in soil. Plant Soil Environ. 2003;49(10):466-472. doi: 10.17221/4158-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Barralis G., Chadoeuf R., Gouet J.P. (1986): Essai de détermination de la taille de l'échantillon pour l'étude du potentiel semencier d'un sol. Weed Res., 26: 291-297. Go to original source...
  2. Benoit D.L., Kenkel N.C., Cavers P.B. (1989): Factors influencing the precision of soil seedbank estimates. Can. J. Bot., 67: 2833-2840. Go to original source...
  3. Cardina J., Sparrow D.H. (1996): A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seedbank. Weed Res., 44: 46-51. Go to original source...
  4. Dessaint F., Barralis G., Beuret E., Caixinhas M.L., Post B.J., Zanin G. (1992): Etude coopérative EWRS: la détermination du potentiel semencier: II - estimation de la précision relative sur la moyenne á partir de composites. Weed Res., 32: 95-101. Go to original source...
  5. Dessaint F., Barralis G., Caixinhas M.L., Mayor J.P., Recasens J., Zanin G. (1996): Precision of soil seedbank sampling: how many soil cores? Weed Res., 36: 143-151. Go to original source...
  6. Dessaint F., Barralis G., Caixinhas M.L., Post B.J., Zanin G. (1990): EWRS collaborative study of weed seedbank estimation: 1. Studies of the relation between the mean and the variance with sampling procedure. Weed Res., 30: 421-429. Go to original source...
  7. Dvořák J. (1971): Weed seedbank in soil. [Dissertation.] VŠZ, Brno. (In Czech)
  8. Dvořák J., Krejčíř J. (1974): A contribution to the study of weed seedbank in topsoil. Brno, 22 (3): 453-461. (In Czech)
  9. Forcella F., Wilson R.G., Rener K.A., Dekker J., Harvey R.J., Alm D.A., Buhler D.D., Cardina J. (1992): Weed seedbanks of the U.S. Corn Belt: Magnitude, variation, emergence and application. Weed Sci., 40: 636-644. Go to original source...
  10. Goyeau H., Fablet G. (1982): Study of weed seedbank in soil: sampling problem. Agronomie, 2: 545-551. Go to original source...
  11. Hron F., Kohout V. (1967): Basic agronomic practices. Handbook of field weeds. SPN, Praha. (In Czech)
  12. Rahman A., James T.K., Grbavac N., Mellsop J. (1995): Evaluation of two methods for enumerating the soil weed seedbank. Proc. 48th New Zealand Plant Protect. Conf.: 175-180. Go to original source...
  13. Rahman A., James T.K., Grbavac N., Mellsop J. (1996): Spatial distribution of weed seedbank in maize cropping fields. Proc. 49th New Zealand Plant Protect. Conf.: 291-295. Go to original source...
  14. Rahman A., James T.K., Waller J.E., Grbavac N. (1997): Soil sampling studies for estimation of weed seedbanks. Proc. 50th New Zealand Plant Protect. Conf., Lincoln Univ., Canterburry: 447-452. Go to original source...
  15. Šeffer J. (1990): Distribution of seed bank of weeds in arable soil. Biologia, 45: 49-60.
  16. Thompson K., Grime J.P. (1979): Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J. Ecol., 67: 893-921. Go to original source...
  17. Zanin G., Berti A., Zuin M.C. (1989): Estimation of the seedbank in cultivated and direct drilled systems. Weed Res., 29: 407-417. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.