Plant Soil Environ., 2004, 50(3):108-115 | DOI: 10.17221/4015-PSE

Succession changes of temporary grass stands on set-aside land

M. Svobodová, J. Šantrůček, J. Urbanec
Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic

The mixtures of Bromus marginatus Nees ex Steud. + Coronilla varia L., Festuca pratensis L. + Lotus corniculatus L., Dactylis aschersoniana Graebn. + Trifolium repens L., Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) P. Beauv. ex J.S. et K.B. Presl + Medicago lupulina L. were sown in rows of 125 mm in the year 1997 in Prague (chernozem, altitude 281 m a.s.l., average precipitation is 472 mm per year, average year temperature 9.3°C). The stands were one or three times per year cut with the mass removing or one or two times mulched. Botanical composition (by weight method), number of present species and agrobotanical groups (grasses, legumes, other dicotyledonous) coverage were measured during 6 years of vegetation. The species number was highest on plots cut 3 times (6-17), it increased linearly. The sown species share in the dry mass yield was 75-99% and the share of grasses decreased linearly with time. The significantly highest dry mass yield was reached when mulched two times per year Bromus marginatus Nees ex Steud. with Coronilla varia L. (till 14 t/ha ). The stands coverage was 43-80%.

Keywords: grass-legume stands; setting-aside; cutting; mulching; botanical composition; coverage

Published: March 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svobodová M, Šantrůček J, Urbanec J. Succession changes of temporary grass stands on set-aside land. Plant Soil Environ. 2004;50(3):108-115. doi: 10.17221/4015-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Fiala J., Gaisler J. (2000): The production of biomass by different management of grasslands without using for forage production. Rostl. Výr., 46: 269-272.
  2. Firbank L.G., Smart S.M., Crabb J., Critchley C.N.R., Fowbert J.W., Fuller R.J., Gladders P., Green D.B., Henderson I., Hill M.O. (2003): Agronomic and ecological costs and benefits of set aside in England. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 95: 73-85. Go to original source...
  3. Klimeš F. (1988): The effectiveness of temporary pratocenoses in the control of Agropyron repens (L.) P. Beauv. and Rumex crispus L. Rostl. Výr., 34: 169-177.
  4. Kvítek T., Klímová P., Šonka J. (1998): The influence of mulching on botanical composition and coverage of meadow stand, evapotranspiration and soil moisture. Rostl. Výr., 44: 553-560.
  5. Matušinský P., Hrabě F. (2003): Dynamics of stand composition changes in grass and grass-clover stands and relations between dominant species. Plant Soil Environ., 49: 119-125. Go to original source...
  6. Svobodová M., Šantrůček J., Brant V. (2001): Yield and coverage of legumes and legume-grass mixtures on set-aside arable land. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Roln. H. Kollataja, Kraków: 79-82.
  7. Šantrůček J., Svobodová M., Brant V. (2002): Changes of botanical composition of grass stands under different ways of management. Rostl. Výr., 48: 499-504. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.