Plant Soil Environ., 2004, 50(6):235-242 | DOI: 10.17221/4027-PSE

Barley response to the soil reserve of sulphur and ammonium sulphate in short-term experiments under controlled conditions of cultivation

J. Matula
Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic

The objective of the paper was to determine an appropriate concentration of available sulphur in soil for the initial growth of plants. Based on previous researches two methods of soil extraction were used to acquire information on the soil reserve: water extraction (H2O 1:5, w/v) and extraction in 0.5M ammonium acetate with addition of NH4F (KVK-UF soil test). Spring barley was used as a test crop to determine the soil reserve of sulphur and its response to sulphur addition to the soil. A collection of 48 samples of topsoil from agriculturally important localities in the CR was made up for this purpose and the parameters of the nutrient status of the soil were remarkably different. A set of soils was used to establish short-time vegetation experiments in a plant growth chamber according to the scheme: A) control - without sulphur application and B) response variant with application of 30 mg S/kg of soil in the form of (NH)4SO4; nitrogen in variant A was adjusted by application of NH4Cl. Index of nutrient efficiency (IE = Y/N where Y = yield and N = nutrient concentration in the plant) and boundary lines of the point field were used to evaluate the efficiency of barley nutrition with sulphur. The efficient soil reserve of sulphur for the soil test H2O (1:5) when the ICP analytical technique was used was indicated in the range of 8-11 mg S/kg; 6-10 mg S/kg for sulphate detection on a SKALAR analyser. The efficient utilisation of sulphur by barley plants for the KVK-UF soil test was in the range of 7-12 mg S/kg. The conversion of the KVK-UF S-test to the index of soil reserve of sulphur by adding up a variable portion of the CEC value to the value of sulphur determined by the soil test (0.0167CEC + 9.1667) improved the closeness of the relationship between soil and plant.

Keywords: sulphur; soil testing; barley

Published: June 30, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Matula J. Barley response to the soil reserve of sulphur and ammonium sulphate in short-term experiments under controlled conditions of cultivation. Plant Soil Environ. 2004;50(6):235-242. doi: 10.17221/4027-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Black C.A. (1993): Soil fertility evaluation and control. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, Florida USA.
  2. Eriksen J., Mortensen J.V., Nielsen J.D., Nielsen N.E. (1995): Sulphur mineralization in five Danish soils as measured by plant uptake in a pot experiment. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 56: 43-51. Go to original source...
  3. Eriksen J., Murphy M.D., Schnug E. (1998): The soil sulphur cycle. In: Schnug E. (ed.): Sulphur in agroecosystem. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, Boston, London: 39-73. Go to original source...
  4. Evanylo G.K., Sumner M.E. (1987): Utilization of the boundary line approach in the development of soil nutrient norms for soybean production. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 18: 1379-1401 Go to original source...
  5. Matula J. (1986): Using of nitrogen efficiency index for evaluation of dressing and nutrient status of plant. Rostl. Výr., 32: 1089-1094. (In Czech)
  6. Matula J. (1996): Determination of potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, manganese and cation exchange capacity for fertilizer recommendations used by Czech Union of rapeseed growers. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 27: 1679-1691. Go to original source...
  7. Matula J. (1999a): Use of multinutrient soil tests for sulphur determination. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 30: 1733-1746. Go to original source...
  8. Matula J. (1999b): Multinutrient soil tests and bioavailability of potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, manganese and sulphur from soils (in Czech). Rostl. Výr., 45: 545-553.
  9. Matula J., Knop K., Přibyl A. (1982): Evaluation of stage of nitrogen of fodder crops and manuring efficiency using nitrogen efficiency index. In: Sbor. VŠZ AF Praha: 605-615. (In Czech)
  10. Matula J., Pechová M. (2002): Sulfur and sulfate concentrations in leaves of oilseed rape under field conditions. Rostl. Výr., 48: 433-440. Go to original source...
  11. Matula J., Pirkl J. (1988): Vyluhovací roztok pro stanovení draslíku, hořčíku, vápníku, sodíku, manganu a rostlinám dostupného fosforu v půdě a hodnoty kationtové výměnné kapacity. [Autorské osvědčení.] Praha.
  12. Matula J., Sychová M., Drmotová A. (2000): The effect of nitrogen fertilizers on pool of labile forms of sulphur and nitrogen in soil. Rostl. Výr., 46: 29-35. (In Czech)
  13. Schnug E., Haneklaus S. (1998): Diagnosis of sulphur nutrition. In: Schnug E. (ed.): Sulphur in agroecosystem. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, Boston, London: 1-38. Go to original source...
  14. Webb R.A. (1972): Use of the boundary line in the analysis of biological data. J. Hort. Sci., 47: 309-319 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.