Plant Soil Environ., 2004, 50(8):371-378 | DOI: 10.17221/4046-PSE
Influence of weed infestation on morphological parameters of maize (Zea mays L.)
- Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic
The influence of various ways of regulation in weed infestation of silage maize stands was studied in 1999-2001. Four variants of stands were compared: 1. without weed eradication (check), 2. mechanically weeded throughout the whole vegetation period, 3. mechanically weeded from the beginning of vegetation till the phase of 5th leaf and later on without protection, 4. chemical weeding. The yield of dry mass and morphological characters (height of plants, stem diameter, number of ears per plant etc.) show the substantial negative effect of weed infestation upon the studied parameters. The yield from the check variant reached 8.09 t/ha, from the 2nd variant 13.24 t/ha, from the 3rd variant 11.46 t/ha and from the 4th variant 12.34 t/ha. The decrease of mass in individual parts of plants were observed but their percentage portions were not affected by the level of weed infestation. A high dependence ( = 0.01) between the mass of the whole plant and the ear mass (r = 0.98) was proved. The total number of leaves was not affected by the level of treatment. The results show that the mechanical cultivation of stands at the beginning of vegetation cannot prevent the yield depression cost by weed infestation and the studied parameters cannot reach the level of fully weeded variants.
Keywords: maize; weed infestation; chemical treatment; mechanical treatment; yield; morphological parameters
Published: August 31, 2004 Show citation
References
- Ali M.A., Sarwar A.K.M.G., Prodhan A.K.M.A. (1999): Effect of water stresses on the growth features of different maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. Pakistan J. Bot., 31: 455-460.
- Amador-Ramirez M.D. (1995): Interference of weeds in maize in Zacatecas. Agric. Tecn. Mex., 21: 17-28.
- Anderson R.L. (2000): Cultural systems to aid weed management in semiarid corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol., 14: 630-634.
Go to original source... - Begna S.H., Hamilton R.I., Dwyer L.M., Stewart D.W., Cloutier D., Assemat L., Foroutan-Pour K., Smith D.L. (2001): Morphology and yield response to weed pressure by corn hybrids differing in canopy architecture. Eur. J. Agron., 14: 293-302. Go to original source...
- Berzsenyi Z., Ragab A.Y., Lap D.Q. (1998): Effect of sowing date on the dynamics of vegetative growth in maize hybrids in 1995 and 1996. Novenytermeles, 47: 165-180.
- Ford G.T., Pleasant J.M. (1994): Competitive abilities of 6 corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids with 4 weed-control practices. Weed Technol., 8: 124-128. Go to original source...
- Gonzales-Ponce R., Salas M.L. (1995): Improvement of the growth, grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrition of grain corn through weed control. J. Plant Nutr., 18: 2312-2324. soil and on the maize yield. Novenytermeles, 48: 631-645. Knežević M., Đurkić M., Knežević I., Lončarić Z. (2003): Effects of pre- and post-emergence weed control on 250 300 weed population and maize yield in different tillage systems. Plant Soil Environ., 49: 223-229. Magbool A., Muhammad A., Malik H.N. (1998): Effect of various weed control methods on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and yield in heavily populated weed fields of Islamabad. Sarhad J. Agr., 14: 345-350. Martinková Z., Honěk A. (1998): Competition between maize and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) at different moisture regime. Rostl. Výr., 44: 65-69. Martinková Z., Honěk A. (2001): The effect of time of weed removal on maize yield. Rostl. Výr., 47: 211-217. Revilla P., Butron A., Malvar R.A., Ordas A. (1999): Relationships among kernel weight, early vigor, and growth in maize. Crop Sci., 39: 654-658. Robertson M.J. (1994): Relationships between internode elongation, plant height and leaf appearance in maize. Field Crop Res., 38: 135-145. Stanojevia M. (2000): Effect of crop density and herbicide application on floristic composition and structure of maize weed community. J. Agr. Sci., 45: 7-18. Tollenaar M. (1992): Is low plant density a stress of maize? Madica, 37: 305-311. Tollenaar M., Nissanka S.P., Aguilera A., Weise S.F., Swanton C.J. (1994): Effect of weed interference and soil-nitrogen on 4 maize hybrids. Agron. J., 86: 596-601. Vafabakhsh K., Rashed M.H., Brown H., Cussans G.W., Devine M.D., Duke S.O., Fernandez-Quintanilla C., Helweg A., Labrada R.E., Landes M., Kudsk P., Streibig J.C. (1996): The effect of chemical, cultural, and mechanical control of weeds on morphological characteristics, yield and yield components of corn (Zea mays L.). Proc. 2 nd Int. Weed Control Congr., Copenhagen, Denmark, Vol. 1-4: 693-698. Vrzal J., Fogl J., Veselá M., Fuksa P. (1999): Dynamics of maize growth before harvest. Rostl. Výr., 45: 121-124. Yao N.R., Yeboua K., Kafrouma A. (1991): Effect of intensity and timing of defoliation on growth, yield components and grain-yield in maize. Exp. Agr., 27: 137-144. Yelverton H.F., Coble H.D. (1991): Narrow row spacing and canopy formation reduces weed in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol., 5: 169-174.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.