Plant Soil Environ., 2008, 54(10):413-419 | DOI: 10.17221/404-PSE

Spatial variability of total soil nitrogen and sulphur content at two conventionally managed fields

V. Vaněk, J. Balík, J. Šilha, J. Černý
Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

Spatial variability of total soil nitrogen and sulphur content has been observed in two plots (I - 54 ha and II - 32 ha). Soil samples were taken from the topsoil in a regular grid, which was localised by GPS (individual sampling points were 80 m apart); subsequently total soil N and S contents were analysed. The average N content in plot I was 0.16%; in plot II it was 0.12%. The content of S in plots I and II was 0.09% and 0.08%, respectively. Spatial variability of total N differed in separate parts of the plots. A higher variability was recorded in plot I, where the coefficient of variation (CV) was 15.7%, whereas in plot II it was only 11.1%. However, sulphur showed only little variability, and thus its coefficient of variation was low (2.5 a 2.3% in plots I and II, respectively). A positive and mostly conclusive relationship has been observed between the N content of soil and the crop yield. This effect was more significant in plot II. The S content in soil showed no correlation with yield. Furthermore, positive correlations were observed between field altitude, soil moisture and crop yield in both plots.

Keywords: soil; nitrogen; sulphur; spatial variability; yield

Published: October 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vaněk V, Balík J, Šilha J, Černý J. Spatial variability of total soil nitrogen and sulphur content at two conventionally managed fields. Plant Soil Environ. 2008;54(10):413-419. doi: 10.17221/404-PSE.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Baxter S.J., Oliver M.A., Gaunt J. (2003): A geostatistical analysis of the spatial variation of soil mineral nitrogen and potentially available nitrogen within an arable field. Prec. Agr., 4: 213-226. Go to original source...
    2. Blake-Kalff M.M.A., Hawkesford M.J., Zhao F.J., McGrath S.P. (2000): Diagnosing sulphur deficiency in fieldgrown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Soil, 225: 95-107. Go to original source...
    3. Borůvka L., Donátová H., Němeček J. (2002): Spatial distribution and correlation of soil properties in a field: a case study. Rostl. Výr., 48: 425-432. Go to original source...
    4. Brodský L., Vaněk V., Száková J., Štípek K. (2001): Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties. Rostl. Výr., 47: 521-528.
    5. Dahiya I.S.R., Ablauf K.C., Kersebaum K.C., Richter J. (1985): Spatial variability of some nutrient constituents of an Alfisol from loess. II. Geostatistical analysis. Z. Pfl.-Ernähr. Bodenkde, 148: 268-277. Go to original source...
    6. Gallardo A., Parama M. (2007): Spatial variability of soil elements in two plant communities of NW Spain. Geoderma, 139: 199-208. Go to original source...
    7. Hab erle J., Kroulík M., Svob o da P., L ip avsk ý J., Krejčová J., Cerhanová D. (2004): The spatial variability of mineral nitrogen content in topsoil and subsoil. Plant Soil Environ., 50: 425-433. Go to original source...
    8. Kumhálová J., Matějková Š., Fifernová M., Lipavský J., Kumhála F. (2008): Topography impact on nutrition content in soil and yield. Plant Soil Environ., 54: 255-261. Go to original source...
    9. Marschner H. (1995): Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London.
    10. Marschner P., Rengel Z. (2007): Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. Go to original source...
    11. Mathot M., Mertens J., Verlinden G., Lambert R. (2008): Positive effect of sulphur fertilisation on grasslands yields and quality in Belgium. Eur. J. Agron., 28: 655-658. Go to original source...
    12. Matula J., Pechová M. (2002): Sulfur and sulfate concentrations in leaves of oilseed rape under field conditions. Rostl. Výr., 48: 433-440. Go to original source...
    13. Matula J., Pechová M. (2007): The influence of gypsum treatment on the acquirement of nutrients from soils by barley. Plant Soil Environ., 53: 89-96. Go to original source...
    14. Persson A., Pilesjö P., Eklundh L. (2005): Spatial influence of topographical factors on yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in central Sweden. Prec. Agr., 6: 341-357. Go to original source...
    15. Scherer H.W. (2001): Sulphur in crop production - invited paper. Eur. J. Agron., 14: 81-111. Go to original source...
    16. Šilha J. (2006): Nitrogen fertilisation in precision agriculture. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic. (In Czech)
    17. Skwierawska M., Zawartka L., Zawadzki B. (2008): The effect of different rates and forms of applied sulpur on nutrient composition of planted crops. Plant Soil Environ., 54: 179-189. Go to original source...
    18. Štípek K., Vaněk V., Száková J., Černý J., Šilha J. (2004): Temporal variability of available phosphorus, potassium and magnesium in arable soil. Plant Soil Environ., 50: 547-551. Go to original source...
    19. Vaněk V., Balík J., Pavlíková D., Tlustoš P. (2007): Nutrition of Field and Horticultural Crops. Profi Press, Prague. (In Czech)
    20. Wang L., Mou P.P., Huang J., Wang J. (2007): Spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen in a subtropical forest in China. Plant Soil, 295: 137-150. Go to original source...
    21. Zhao F.J., Spiro B., Poulton P.R., McGrath S.P. (1998): Use of sulphur isotope ratios to determine anthropogenic sulphur signals in a grassland ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Technol., 32: 2288-2291. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content