Plant Soil Environ., 2017, 63(5):195-200 | DOI: 10.17221/801/2016-PSE

Yield and soil coverage of catch crops and their impact on the yield of spring barleyOriginal Paper

Martina HANDLÍŘOVÁ*, Vojtěch LUKAS, Vladimír SMUTNÝ
Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

The aim of experiment was to evaluate the impact of catch crops on the yield of spring barley. An assessment of the suitability of catch crops in relation to their yield and soil coverage was made. The field experiment was set up in a corn-growing area (south Moravia, Czech Republic). The results show a statistically significant difference in yield of dry matter and soil coverage among catch crops as well as among years. The most appropriate was the cultivation of Phacelia tanacetifolia Bentham and Sinapis alba L., which regularly provided the highest yields and soil coverage. In some years, similar results were also achieved for Fagopyrum esculentum Moench and Carthamus tinctorius L. Less suitable catch crops are Secale cereale var. multicaule L., which ensured lower yield and good soil coverage, but reduced the yield of spring barley, and Panicum miliaceum L. Yield of spring barley was affected by year and species of catch crops. The lowest yield of barely was in the year with unfavourable rainfall. The yield decreased with increasing quantities of catch crop matter. In the case of favourable rainfall year, there was no risk of lower yield of spring barley after monitored catch crops in one of the driest and warmest places in the Czech Republic.

Keywords: intercrop; grain; dry conditions; cereals; biomass

Published: May 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HANDLÍŘOVÁ M, LUKAS V, SMUTNÝ V. Yield and soil coverage of catch crops and their impact on the yield of spring barley. Plant Soil Environ. 2017;63(5):195-200. doi: 10.17221/801/2016-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Arlauskiene A., Maikšteniene S. (2006): Improvement of clay loam cambisol properties by cover crops. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 93: 240-251.
  2. Bodner G. (2013): Hydrologische Effekte des Zwischenfruchtanbaus im Trockengebiet. Innovation - Das Magazin für die Landwirtschaft, 2: 18-20.
  3. Brant V., Pivec J., Fuksa P., Neckář K., Kocourková D., Venclová V. (2011): Biomass and energy production of catch crops in areas with deficiency of precipitation during summer period in central Bohemia. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35: 1286-1294. Go to original source...
  4. Brust J., Claupein W., Gerhards R. (2014): Growth and weed suppression ability of common and new cover crops in Germany. Crop Protection, 63: 1-8. Go to original source...
  5. Clark A. (2008): Managing Cover Crops Profitably. Darby, Diane Publishing.
  6. Constantin J., Dürr C., Triboullois H., Justes E. (2015): Catch crop emergence success depends on weather and soil seedbed conditions in interaction with sowing date: A simulation study using the SIMPLE emergence model. Field Crops Research, 176: 22-33. Go to original source...
  7. Gaweda D. (2012): Yield and yield structure of spring barley (Hodeum vulgare L.) grown in monoculture after different stubble crops. Acta Agrobotanica, 64: 91-98. Go to original source...
  8. Lobell D.B., Field C.B. (2007): Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters, 2: 014002. Go to original source...
  9. Lukas V., Procházková B., Smutný V., Dryšlová T., Neudert L. (2013): Estimation of coverage of soil by the catch crops using grand-truth paging in virble spektrum. Növénytermelés, 62: 425-428.
  10. Malecka I., Blecharczyk A. (2008): Effect of tillage systems, mulches and nitrogen fertilization on spring barley (Hordeum vulgare). Agronomy Research, 6: 517-529.
  11. Murakami H., Tsushima S., Akimoto T., Murakami K., Goto I., Shishido Y. (2000): Effects of growing leafy daikon (Raphanus sativus) on populations of Plasmodiophora brassicae (clubroot). Plant Pathology, 49: 584-589. Go to original source...
  12. Mündel H., Blacksaw R.E., Byers J.R., Huang H.C., Johnson D.L., Keon R., Kubík J., McKenzie R., Otto B., Roth B., Standford K. (2004): Carthamus tinctorius Production on the Canadian Prairies: Revisited in 2004. Ottawa, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Center.
  13. Ramírez-Garcia J., Gabriel J.L., Alonso-Ayuso M., Quemada M. (2015): Quantitative characterization of five cover crop species. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 153: 1174-1185. Go to original source...
  14. Rinnofner T., Friedel J.K., de Kruijff R., Pietsch G., Freyer B. (2008): Effect of catch crops on N dynamics and following crops in organic farming. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28: 551-558. Go to original source...
  15. Sapkota T.B., Askegaard M., Laegdsmand M., Olesen J.E. (2012): Effects of catch crop type and root depth on nitrogen leaching and yield of spring barley. Field Crops Research, 125: 129-138. Go to original source...
  16. Sparrow L.A. (2015): Six years of results from a potato rotation and green manure trial in Tasmania, Australia. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 1076: 29-35. Go to original source...
  17. Talgre L., Lauringson E., Makke A., Lauk R. (2011): Biomass production and nutrient binding of catch crops. Zemdirbyste=Agriculture, 98: 251-258.
  18. Ziech A.R.D., Conceicao P.C., Luchese A.V., Balin N.M., Candiotto G., Garmus T.G. (2015): Soil protection by winter-cycle cover crops in South Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 50: 347-382. Go to original source...
  19. Žalud Z., Trnka M., Dubrovský M., Hlavinka P., Semerádová D., Kocmánková E. (2009): Climate change impacts on selected aspects of the Czech agricultural production. Plant Protection Science, 45: S11-S19. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.