Plant Soil Environ., 2002, 48(8):351-355 | DOI: 10.17221/4379-PSE

Yield performance of two buckwheat genotypes grown as a full-season and stubble-crop

F. Bavec, S. Pušnik, I. Rajčan
1 Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maribor, Slovenia
2 Institute of Agriculture, Maribor, Slovenia
3 University of Guelph, Canada

Traditional way of growing buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum L.) in Slovenia is stubble-crop production, but grown as a full-season crop it yields more. Genotypes that are adapted to stubble-crop system may not necessarily be the best adapted for the full-season crop. The objective of this study was to determine yield performance of two buckwheat genotypes under stubble-crop and full-season production system. The experiments (randomised block design) were conducted in Podravje region with two common determinant buckwheat genotypes (land race population and cultivar Darja) in 1997 and 1998. Buckwheat grown as a full-season crop had a greater leaf area index, more flower clusters, more developed seeds and 42% higher yield than the stubble-crop buckwheat. Although cultivar Darja had 10% less flower clusters than the land race population, the number of flowers and the number of developed grains were higher. The 35% higher grain yield of cultivar Darja was associated with larger leaf area index than land race population (4.0 vs. 2.3). Cultivar Darja outperformed the land race population under full-season crop production, whereas the yield difference between the two varieties was not significant under the stubble-crop production. These results suggest that the best yielding buckwheat genotypes should be determined separately for stubble-crop and/or full-season production system.

Keywords: Fagopyrum esculentum; genotype; production system; leaf area index; yield

Published: August 31, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bavec F, Pušnik S, Rajčan I. Yield performance of two buckwheat genotypes grown as a full-season and stubble-crop. Plant Soil Environ. 2002;48(8):351-355. doi: 10.17221/4379-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Aufhammer W., Esswein H., Kübler E. (1994): Zur Entwicklung und Nutzbarkeit des Kornertragspotencials von Buchweizen (Fagopyrum esculentum). Bodenkultur, 45: 37–47.
  2. Aufhammer W., Kübler E. (1998): Investigations of the agronomical value of the cereals milllet (Panicum miliaceaum), canary grass (Phalaris canariensis) and the pseudocereals buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and amaranth (Amaranthus sp.). Bodenkultur, 49: 159–169.
  3. Aufhammer W., Kübler E., Lee J.H. (1999): Grain quality of the pseudocereals buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench), quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. × A. hybridus L.) in relation to growing conditions. Bodenkultur, 50: 11–24.
  4. Bavec F. (2000): Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum L.). In: Some disregarded and/or new field crops. Univ. Maribor, Slovenia: 6–16. (In Slovene)
  5. Bavec F., Bavec M. (2001): Effect of maize plant double row spacing on nutrient uptake, leaf area index and yield. Rostl. Výr., 47: 135–140.
  6. Bavec F., Bavec M. (2002): Effect of plant population on leaf area index, cob characteristics and grain yield of early maturing maize cultivars (FAO 100–400). Eur. J. Agric., 16: 151–159. Go to original source...
  7. Hagiwara M., Inoue N., Matano N. (1998): Allometry among roots, leaves and flower clusters in common buckwheat. Fagopyrum, 15: 29–34.
  8. Jiang H.M.J., Whelton P.K., Mo J.P., Chen J.Y., Quian M.C., Mo P.S., He G.Q. (1995): Oats and buckwheat intakes and cardiovascular disease risk factors in an ethnic minority in China. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr., 61: 366–372. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Lee H. J., Aufhammer W., Kübler E. (1996): Gebildete, geerntete un verwertbare Kornerträge der Pseudocerealien Buchweizen (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench), Reismelde (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.), und Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. × A. hybridus L.) in Abhängigkeit von pflanzenbaulichen Massnahmen. Bodenkultur, 47: 5–12.
  10. Liszewski M. (1999): Response of buckwheat to early planting depending on weather conditions. Folia Univ. Agric. Stat. Agric., 79: 139–141. (In Polish)
  11. Michalova A. (1998): Variability of selected characteristics in sets of buckwheat, millet and amaranth, selection of perspective genotypes and comparison of their nutritive value. Res. Rep. Biot. Fac. UL, 71: 115–125.
  12. Michiyama H., Hayashi H. (1998): Differences of growth and development between summer and autumn ecotype cultivars in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Jap. J. Crop Sci., 67: 323–330. (In Japanese) Go to original source...
  13. Rajbhandari B.P., Hatley E.O., Gautman B.R., Shrestha P.L. (1995): Eco-physiological aspects of yield formation in common buckwheat ecotypes. Sym. Curr. Adv. In: Buckwheat Res.: 705–715.
  14. Sugimoto H., Sato T. (1999): Summer buckwheat cultivation in the warm southwestern region of Japan – effects of sowing time on growth and seed yield. Jap. J. Crop Sci., 68: 39–44. (In Japanese) Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.