Plant Soil Environ., 2005, 51(3):110-123 | DOI: 10.17221/3563-PSE

Evaluation of MACRO model by short-term water and solute transport simulation in Maury silt loam soil

H. Merdun1, V.L. Quisenberry2
1 Faculty of Agriculture, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Turkey
2 Faculty of Agriculture, Clemson University, USA

Modeling preferential flow has been a concern of many academic fields in the past 30 years all over the world and helps to prevent groundwater contamination. A dual-porosity model, MACRO, was evaluated for short-term (less than 2 days) simulation of water flow and non-reactive solute (chloride) transport through the profile of six plots in well-structured Maury silt loam soil. Water flow in micropores is calculated by the Richards' equation while simple gravity flow is assumed in the macropores. Solute transport in the micropores is calculated by the convection-dispersion equation (CDE) while the dispersion and diffusion in the CDE is neglected for the solute transport in the macropores. The applied water and chloride reached the bottom of the profile during the 2 and 1-hour(s) application periods in studies 2 and 3, respectively. There is a strong indication of macropore flow in this soil. Based on the statistical criteria, the model accurately simulated water flow and solute transport with depth and time in all plots. The mean values of three statistical parameters (coefficient of residual mass, model efficiency, and correlation coefficient) for water and chloride transport were -0.0014, 0.791, 0.903 and 0.0333, 0.923, 0.956, respectively. Preliminary studies showed that the model could not simulate flow and transport well enough with the one-domain flow concept. In the two-domain flow, effective diffusion path-length, boundary hydraulic conductivity, and boundary soil water pressure were the three most important parameters that control flow and transport between the two domains. The effective diffusion path-length represented the structural development with depth in the Maury silt loam soil.

Keywords: MACRO; macropore flow; modelling; solute transport; structured soil; two-domain

Published: March 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Merdun H, Quisenberry VL. Evaluation of MACRO model by short-term water and solute transport simulation in Maury silt loam soil. Plant Soil Environ. 2005;51(3):110-123. doi: 10.17221/3563-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Andreu L., Moreno F., Jarvis N.J., Vachaud G. (1994): Application of the model MACRO to water movement and salt leaching in drained and irrigated marsh soils, Marismas, Spain. Agricultural Water Management, 25: 71-88. Go to original source...
  2. Armstrong A., Aden K., Amraoui N., Diekkruger B., Jarvis N.J., Mouvet C., Nicholls P., Wittwer C. (2000): Comparison of the performance of the pesticide-leaching models on a cracking clay soil: results using the Brimstone Farm dataset. Agricultural Water Management, 44: 85-104. Go to original source...
  3. Beven K., Germann P. (1981): Water flow in soil macropores II. A combined flow model. Soil Science, 32: 15-29. Go to original source...
  4. Beven K., Germann P. (1982): Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resources Research, 18: 1311-1325. Go to original source...
  5. Bouma J. (1980): Soil morphology and preferential flow along macropores. Agricultural Water Management, 3: 235-250. Go to original source...
  6. Brooks R.H., Corey A.T. (1964): Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology papers, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. No. 3.
  7. Chen C., Wagenet R.J. (1992): Simulation of water and chemicals in macropore soils. Part 1. Representation of the equivalent macropore influence and its effect soil water flow. Journal of Hydrology, 130: 105-126. Go to original source...
  8. Durner W. (1992): Predicting the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using multiporosity water retention curves. In: van Genuchten M.Th. et al. (eds.): Indirect methods for estimating the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. University of California, Riverside: 185-202.
  9. Durner W. (1994): Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resources Research, 30: 211-223. Go to original source...
  10. Ersahin S., Papendick R.I., Smith J.L., Keller C.K., Manoranjan V.S. (2002): Macropore transport of bromide as influenced by soil structure differences. Geoderma, 108: 207-223. Go to original source...
  11. Flury M. (1996): Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils. A review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 25: 558-566. Go to original source...
  12. Flury M., Fluhler H., Jury W.A., Leuenberger J. (1994): Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: A field study. Water Resources Research, 30: 1945-1954. Go to original source...
  13. Gerke H.H., van Genuchten M.T. (1993): A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resources Research, 29: 305-319. Go to original source...
  14. Gerke H.H., van Genuchten M.T. (1993): Evaluation of a first-order water transfer term for variably saturated dual-porosity flow models. Water Resources Research, 29: 1225-1238. Go to original source...
  15. Gottesburen B., Aden K., Barlund I., Brown C., Dust M., Gorlitz G., Jarvis N.J., Rekolainen S., Schafer H. (2000): Comparison of the pesticide leaching models: Results using the Weiherbach dataset. Agricultural Water Management, 44: 153-181. Go to original source...
  16. Hatfield M.W. (1988): Water and anion movement in a typic Hapludult. [PhD Thesis.] Clemson University, USA.
  17. Hutson J.L., Wagenet R.J. (1995): Multi-region water flow and chemical transport in heterogeneous soils. In: Walker A. et al. (eds.): Theory and applications. Pesticide movement to water. Proceedings BCPC Symposium, Monography 62, Warwick University, Coventry, UK: 171-180.
  18. Jabro J.D., Jemison J.M., Fox R.H., Fritton D.D. (1994): Predicting bromide leaching under field conditions using SLIM and MACRO. Soil Science, 157: 215-223. Go to original source...
  19. Jarvis N.J. (1995): Simulation of soil water dynamics and herbicide persistence in a silt loam soil using the MACRO model. Ecological Modeling, 81: 97-109. Go to original source...
  20. Jarvis N.J., Bergstrom L., Dik P.E. (1991b): Modeling water and solute transport in macroporous soil. II. Chloride breakthrough under non-steady flow. Soil Science, 42: 71-81. Go to original source...
  21. Jarvis N.J., Brown C.D., Granitza E. (2000): Sources of error in model predictions of pesticide leaching: a case study using the MACRO model. Agricultural Water Management, 44: 247-262. Go to original source...
  22. Jarvis N.J., Johnsson P.E., Dik P.E., Messing I. (1991a): Modeling water and solute transport in macroporous soil. I. Model description and sensitivity analysis. Soil Science, 42: 59-70. Go to original source...
  23. Jarvis N.J., Larsson M.H. (1998): The MACRO model (Version 4.1) - Technical description. http://130.238.110.134:80/bgf/Macrohtm/macro.htm, Department of Soil Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
  24. Jarvis N.J., Stahli M., Bergstrom L.F., Johnson H. (1994): Simulation of dichlorprop and bentazon leaching in soils of contrasting texture using the MACRO model. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, A29: 1255-1277. Go to original source...
  25. Jarvis N.J., Villholth K.G., Ulen B. (1999): Modeling particle mobilization and leaching in macroporous soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 50: 621-632. Go to original source...
  26. Larsson M.H., Jarvis N.J. (1999a): A dual-porosity model to quantify macropore flow effects on nitrate leaching. Journal of Environmental Quality, 28: 1298-1307. Go to original source...
  27. Larsson M.H., Jarvis N.J. (1999b): Evaluation of a dualporosity model to predict field-scale solute transport in a macroporous soil. Journal of Hydrology, 215: 153-171. Go to original source...
  28. Loague K., Green R.E. (1991): Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. Journal of Control Hydrology, 7: 51-73. Go to original source...
  29. Mohanty B.P., Bowman R.S., Hendricks J.M.H., van Genuchten M.Th. (1997): New piecewise-continuous functions for modeling preferential flow in an intermittent-flood irrigated field. Water Resources Research, 33: 2049-2063. Go to original source...
  30. Mualem Y. (1976): A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 12: 513-522. Go to original source...
  31. Nelson P.A. (1990): Solute movement and root distribution as affected by soil structure. [PhD Thesis.] Clemson University, USA.
  32. Quisenberry V.L., Philips R.E. (1976): Percolation of surface applied water in the field. Soil Science Society of American Proceedings, 40: 484-489. Go to original source...
  33. Quisenberry V.L., Phillips R.E., Zeleznik J.M. (1994): Spatial distribution of water and chloride macropore flow in a well-structured soil. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 58: 1294-1300. Go to original source...
  34. Richards L.A. (1931): Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics, 1: 318-333. Go to original source...
  35. Romkens M.J.M., Phillips R.E., Selim H.M., Whisler F.D. (1985): Physical characteristics of soils in the southern region: Vicksburg, Memphis, and Maury series. Southern Cooperating Bulletin, No. 266. MS. Agricultural Experimental Station, Starkville.
  36. Roulier S., Jarvis N.J. (2003a): Analysis of inverse procedures for estimating parameters controlling macropore flow and solute transport in the dual-permeability model MACRO. Vadose Zone Journal, 2: 349-357. Go to original source...
  37. Roulier S., Jarvis N.J. (2003b): Modeling macropore flow effects on pesticide leaching: Inverse parameter estimation using microlysimeters. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32: 2341-2353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Sadeghi A.M., Isensee A.R., Shirmohammadi A. (2000): Influence of soil texture and tillage on herbicide transport. Chemosphere, 41: 1327-1332. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Saxena R.K., Jarvis N.J., Bergstrom L. (1994): Interpreting non-steady state tracer breakthrough experiments in sand and clay soil using a dual-porosity model. Journal of Hydrology, 162: 279-298. Go to original source...
  40. Skopp J., Gardner W.R., Tyler E.J. (1981): Solute movement in structured soils: Two-region model with small interaction. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 45: 837-842. Go to original source...
  41. Thomas G.W., Swoboda A.R. (1970): Anion exclusion effects on chloride movement in soils. Soil Science, 110: 163-166. Go to original source...
  42. van Genuchten M.Th., Cleary R.W. (1976): Movement of solutes in soil. In: Bolt G.H. (ed.): Soil chemistry. Part B. Physico-chemical models. Elsevier, New York: 349-386.
  43. van Genuchten M.Th., Dalton F.N. (1986): Models for simulating salt movement in aggregated field soils. Geoderma, 38: 165-183. Go to original source...
  44. Villholth K.G., Jensen K.H. (1998): Flow and transport processes in a macroporous subsurface-drained glacial till soil. II: Model analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 207: 121-135. Go to original source...
  45. Zurmuhl T., Durner W. (1998): Determinations of parameters for bimodal hydraulic functions by inverse modeling. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 62: 874-880. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.