Plant Soil Environ., 2005, 51(6):249-254 | DOI: 10.17221/3582-PSE

The measurement of plant residues distribution quality after harvest by conventional and axial combine harvesters

F. Kumhála, Z. Kvíz, J. Mašek, P. Procházka
Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic

This paper concerns the evaluation of the husk and straw distribution quality measurement on different commonly used combine harvesters. The plant residues can significantly influence the next plant germination and growth, especially when they are unevenly placed on the field surface. The experiments were realised during the harvesting season in years 2001, 2002 and 2003. All machines were evaluated under normal operational conditions by winter wheat and oil rape harvest. For plant residues distribution quality evaluation the Christiansen's coefficient was calculated. The most important outcome from the measurement is that the distribution pattern of husk and straw depends on instantaneous material feed rate through the harvester. The higher material feed rate the worse regularity of husk and straw distribution. Axial combine harvesters break up straw more intensively then tangential combine harvesters. Straw crushers on tangential combine harvesters are therefore more loaded and need more attention from the crushing and distribution quality point of view. On the contrary, on axial combine harvesters most material goes on cleaning sieves and more attention should be paid to this small particles distribution.

Keywords: combine harvesters; straw crushing; plant remains; distribution quality

Published: June 30, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kumhála F, Kvíz Z, Mašek J, Procházka P. The measurement of plant residues distribution quality after harvest by conventional and axial combine harvesters. Plant Soil Environ. 2005;51(6):249-254. doi: 10.17221/3582-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Ball B.C., Robertson E.A.G. (1990): Straw incorporation and tillage methods: straw decomposition, denitrification and growth and yield of winter barley. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research: 223-243. Go to original source...
  2. Horáček J., Ledvina R., Raus A. (2001): The content and quality of organic matter in cambisol in a long-term no-tillage system. Rostlinná Výroba, 47: 205-210.
  3. Johnson R.R. (1988): Soil engaging tool effects on surface residue and roughness with chisel-type implements. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 52: 237-243. Go to original source...
  4. Kumhála F. Kroulík M., Vašák J., Kvíz Z. (2002): The influence of CASE IH combine harvesters' straw and husk distribution design changes on distribution quality. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 33: 36-40.
  5. Kvíz Z., Kumhála F., Mašek J., Kroulík M., Procházka P. (2003): The distribution quality of plant residues after harvest by different combine harvesters. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 34: 146-151.
  6. Procházková B., Hrubý J., Dovrtěl J., Dostál O. (2003): Effects of different organic amendment on winter wheat yields under long-term continuous cropping. Plant, Soil and Environment, 49: 433-438. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.