Plant Soil Environ., 2009, 55(9):389-396 | DOI: 10.17221/136/2009-PSE

Approaches for diversity analysis of cultivable and non-cultivable bacteriain real soil

P. Štursa1, O. Uhlík1,2, V. Kurzawová1, J. Koubek1, M. Ionescu1, M. Strohalm1,3, P. Lovecká1, T. Macek2, M. Macková1,2
1 Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Technology in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry CAS, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Laboratory of Molecular Structure Characterization, Institute of Microbiology CAS, Prague, Czech Republic

Until recently, investigators had no idea how accurately cultivated microorganisms represented the overall microbial diversity. The cultivation-dependent approach is limited by the fact that the overwhelming majority of microorganisms present in soil cannot be cultivated under laboratory conditions. The development of molecular phylogenetics has recently enabled characterization of naturally occurring microbial biota without cultivation. There is a vast amount of information held within the genomes of cultivable and non-cultivable microorganisms, and new methods based on analysis of DNA allow to investigate this potential. In this work we show some aspects, advantages and disadvantages of classical and new approaches in taxonomical and functional description of bacteria present in natural microbial assemblages on the example of cultivable bacteria isolated from rhizosphere of plants, tobacco and black nightshade, planted in PCB contaminated soil. Biochemical analysis of isolates showed 8 different bacterial species. This identification was compared by discrimination using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and identity evaluation after sequencing of 16S rDNA. Six strains from original number of 8 were positively identified after 16S rDNA sequencing and their phylogenetic relations were compared. These analyses confirmed closed relations of all species (two of isolates exhibited the same characteristics and were discriminated as the same species Pseudomonas stutzeri) and also of Burkholderia xenovorans LB 400, a well-known PCB degrader. Nevertheless, only two isolates gave a positive reaction after amplification of the biphenyl dioxygenase gene and exhibited potential to degrade PCB. These results indicate that only a subset of the recovered molecular information, derived from active population based on molecular and functional analysis is relevant to microbial ecology.

Keywords: microbial diversity; cultivable bacteria; non-cultivable bacteria; SIP; DGGE; TGGE; T-RFLP; MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

Published: September 30, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Štursa P, Uhlík O, Kurzawová V, Koubek J, Ionescu M, Strohalm M, et al.. Approaches for diversity analysis of cultivable and non-cultivable bacteriain real soil. Plant Soil Environ. 2009;55(9):389-396. doi: 10.17221/136/2009-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Amann R.I., Ludwig W., Schleifer K.H. (1995): Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiological Review, 59: 143-169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Barriault D., Sylvestre M. (2004): Evolution of the biphenyl dioxygenase BphA from Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 by random mutagenesis of multiple sites in region III. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279: 47480-47478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Busse H.J., Denner E.B., Lubitz W. (1996): Classification and identification of bacteria: current approaches to an old problem. Overview of methods used in bacterial systematics. Journal of Biotechnology, 47: 3-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. de Cárcer D.A., Martín M., Mackova M., Macek T., Karlson U., Rivilla R. (2007): The introduction of genetically modified microorganisms designed for rhizoremediation induces changes on native bacteria in the rhizosphere but not in the surrounding soil. The Journal of the International Society for Microbial Ecology, 1: 215-223. Go to original source...
  5. Ercolini D. (2004): PCR-DGGE fingerprinting: novel strategies for detection of microbes in food. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 5: 297-314. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hall N. (2007): Advanced sequencing technologies and their wider impact in microbiology. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210: 1518-1525. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Kling J. (2003): Ultrafast DNA sequencing. Nature Biotechnology, 21: 1425-1427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Krishnamurthy T., Ross P.L. (1996): Rapid identification of bacteria by direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric analysis of whole cells. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 10: 1992-1996. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Lay J.O. (2000): MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and bacterial taxonomy. Analytical Chemistry, 19: 507- 516. Go to original source...
  10. Lay J.O. (2001): MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry of bacteria. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 20: 172-194. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Leigh M.B., Prouzová P., Macková M., Macek T., Nagle D.P., Fletcher J.S. (2006): Polychlorinated bacteria associated with the trees in a PCB-contaminated site. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72: 2331-2342. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Manefield M., Whiteley A.S., Bailey M.J. (2004): What can stable isotope probing do for bioremediation? International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 54: 163-166. Go to original source...
  13. Muyzer G. (1999): DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2: 317-322. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Niemi R.M., Heiskanen I., Wallenius K., Lindstöm K. (2001): Extraction and purification of DNA in rhizosphere soil samples for PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial consortia. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 45: 155-165. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Osborn A.M., Moore E.R.B., Timmis K.N. (2000): An evaluation of terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis for the study of microbial community structure and dynamics. Environmental Microbiology, 2: 39-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Radajewski S., McDonald I.R., Murell J.C.(2003): Stable-isotope probing of nucleic acids: a window to the function of uncultured microorganisms. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 14: 296-302. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Ruelle V., El Moualij B., Zorzi W. (2004): Rapid identification of environmental bacterial strains by matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 18: 2013-2019. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Ryslava E., Krejčík Z., Macek T., Novakova H., Mackova M. (2003): Study of PCB biodegradation in real contaminated soil. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 12: 296-301.
  19. Sanger F. (1981): Determination of nucleotide sequences in DNA. Bioscience Reports, 1: 3-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Tillmann S., Strömpl C., Timmis K.N., Abraham W.R. (2005): Stable isotope probing reveals the dominant role of Burkholderia species in aerobic degradation of PCBs, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 52: 207-217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Torsvik V., Daae F.L., Sandaa R.A. (1998): Novel techniques for analysing microbial diversity in natural and perturbed environments. Journal of Biotechnology, 64: 53-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Uhlík O., Jecna K., Mackova M., Macek T. (2008): Stable isotope probing as a tool for the detection of active microorganisms in xenobiotics degradation. Chemické Listy, 102: 474-479.
  23. van Baar B.L. (2000): Characterisation of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation and electrospray mass spectrometry. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24: 193-219. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Wackett L.P. (2004): Stable isotope probing in biodegradation research. Trends in Biotechnology, 22: 153-154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.