Plant Soil Environ., 2010, 56(8):384-392 | DOI: 10.17221/189/2009-PSE

Soybean yield and yield component distribution across the main axis in response to light enrichment and shading under different densities

B. Liu1,2,3, X.B. Liu1, C. Wang1, Y.S. Li1, J. Jin1, S.J. Herbert4
1 Key Laboratory of Mollisol Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin, P.R. China
2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
3 College of Life Science, Jilin Normal University, Siping, P.R. China
4 Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA

A 2-year field experiment was conducted under light enrichment and shading conditions to examine the responses of seed yield and yield components distribution across main axis in soybean. The results showed that the maximum increase in seed yield per plant by light enrichment occurred at 27 plants/m2, while the most significant reduction in seed yield per plant by shading occurred at 54 plants/m2. Light enrichment beginning at early flowering stage decreased seed size on average by 7% while shading increased seed size on average by 9% over densities and cultivars, resulting in a fewer extent compensation in seed yield decrement. Responses to light enrichment and shading occurred proportionately across the main axis node positions despite the differences in the time (15-20 days) of development of yield components between the high and low node positions. Variation intensity of seed size of three soybeans was dissimilar as a result of changes in the environment during the reproductive period. The small-seed cultivar had the greatest stability in single seed size across the main axis, followed by moderate-seed cultivar, while large-seed cultivar was the least stable. Although maximum seed size may be determined by genetic potential in soybean plants, our results suggested that seed size can still be modified by environmental conditions, and the impact can be expressed through some internal control moderating the final size of most seeds in main stem and in all pods. It indicates that, through redistributing the available resources across main stem to components, soybean plants showed the mechanism, in an attempt to maintain or improve yield in a constantly changing environment.

Keywords: light enrichment; shading; yield component; seed size

Published: August 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Liu B, Liu XB, Wang C, Li YS, Jin J, Herbert SJ. Soybean yield and yield component distribution across the main axis in response to light enrichment and shading under different densities. Plant Soil Environ. 2010;56(8):384-392. doi: 10.17221/189/2009-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Board J.E., Kamal M., Harville B.G. (1992): Temporal importance of greater light interception to increased yield in narrow-row soybean. Agronomy Journal, 84: 575-579. Go to original source...
  2. Board J.E., Tan Q. (1995): Assimilatory capacity effects on soybean yield components and pod number. Crop Science, 35: 846-851. Go to original source...
  3. Board J.E., Harville B.G. (1996): Growth dynamics during the vegetative period affects yield of narrow-row, late-planted soybean. Agronomy Journal, 88: 567-572. Go to original source...
  4. Costa J.A., Oplinger E.S., Pendleton J.W. (1980): Response of soybean cultivars to planting patterns. Agronomy Journal, 72: 153-156. Go to original source...
  5. Egli D.B., Guffy R.D., Meckel L.W. (1985): The effect of sourcesink alterations on soybean seed growth. Annals of Botany, 55: 395-402. Go to original source...
  6. Egli D.B. (2005): Flowering, pod set and reproductive success in soybean. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 191: 283-291. Go to original source...
  7. Ephrath J.E., Wang R.F., Terashima K., Hesketh J.D., Huck M.G., Hummel J.W. (1993): Shading effects on soybean and corn. Biotronics, 22: 15-24.
  8. Fehr W.R., Caviness C.E. (1977): Stages of soybean development. Iowa State University. Coop. Ext. Ser. Spec. Rep. 80.
  9. Heindl J.C., Brun W.A. (1984): Patterns of reproductive abscission, seed yield, and yield components in soybean. Crop Science, 24: 542-545. Go to original source...
  10. Herbert S.J., Litchfield G.V. (1982): Partitioning soybean yield components. Crop Science, 22: 1074-1079. Go to original source...
  11. Jiang H., Egli D.B. (1993): Shade induced changes in flower and pod number and flower and fruit abscission in soybean. Agronomy Journal, 85: 221-225. Go to original source...
  12. Jiang H., Egli D.B. (1995): Soybean seed number and crop growth rate during flowering. Agronomy Journal, 87: 264-267. Go to original source...
  13. Li C.Y., Sun Z.D., Chen H.Z., Yang S.Z. (2006): Influence of shading stress during different growth stage on yield and main characters of soybean. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 19: 265-269. (In Chinese)
  14. Liu X.B., Herbert S.J., Baath K., Hashemi A.M. (2006a): Soybean (Glycine max) seed growth characteristics in response to light enrichment and shading. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52: 178-185. Go to original source...
  15. Liu X.B., Herbert S.J., Zhang Q.Y., Hashemi A.M. (2006b): Yielddensity relation of glyphosate-soya beans and their responses to light enrichment in north-eastern USA. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 193: 55-62. Go to original source...
  16. Liu X.B., Jin J., Wang G.H., Herbert S.J. (2008): Soybean yield physiology and development of high-yielding practices in Northeast China. Field Crops Research, 105: 157-171. Go to original source...
  17. Mathew J.P., Herbert S.J., Zhang S.H., Rautenkranz F.A.A., Litchfield G.V. (2000): Differential response of soybean yield components to the timing of light enrichment. Agronomy Journal, 92: 1156-1161. Go to original source...
  18. Myers R.L., Brun W.A., Brenner M.L. (1987): Effect of racemelocalized supplemental light on soybean reproductive abscission. Crop Science, 27: 273-277. Go to original source...
  19. Purcell L.C., Ball R.A., Reaper J.D., Vories E.D. (2002): Radiation use efficiency and biomass production in soybean at different plant population densities. Crop Science, 42: 172-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. SAS Institute Inc. (1996): SAS/STAT User's Guide Release 6.09. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  21. Schou J.B., Jeffers D.L., Streetter J.G. (1978): Effects of reflectors, black boards, or shades applied at different stages of plant development on yield of soybeans. Crop Science, 18: 29-34. Go to original source...
  22. Sharma K., Neelu W., Sharma K., Walia N. (1996): Growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] as influenced by light intensity and cytokinin. Indian Agricultural Reasearch, 39: 253-257.
  23. Spaeth S.C., Sinclair T.R. (1984): Soybean seed growth. I. Timing of growth of individual seeds. Agronomy Journal, 76: 123-127. Go to original source...
  24. Svecnjak Z., Varga B., Butorac J. (2006): Yield components of apical and subapical ear contributing to the grain yield responses of prolific maize at high and low plant populations. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 192: 37-42. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.