Plant Soil Environ., 2013, 59(10):446-451 | DOI: 10.17221/170/2013-PSE

The soil hydrogel improved photosynthetic performance of beech seedlings treated under droughtOriginal Paper

G. Jamnická1, ¥. Ditmarová1, D. Kurjak2,3, J. Kme»2, E. P¹idová1, M. Macková2, D. Gömöry2, K. Støelcová2
1 Instituteof Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Zvolen, Slovak Republic
2 Faculty of Forestry, Technical University Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic
3 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The effect of soil amendment with the STOCKOSORB®500 MICRO hydrophilic polymer on the photosynthetic traits in beech seedlings (Fagus sylvatica L.) during 50 days of dehydration was investigated. Dehydration was detected through osmotic potential (Ψs) in the assimilatory organs of beech seedlings. The addition of Stockosorb positively affected the CO2 assimilation rate (A) and instantaneous water use efficiency (A/T), for severely drought-treated seedlings. In comparison with irrigated plants, the values of A of non-irrigated plants with Stockosorb substrate decreased by 50%, and in non-irrigated plants with common substrate by 88%. The fast kinetics of chlorophyll a fluorescence indicated chronic photoinhibition under drought treatment without Stockosorb, while no significant changes in maximal quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm) were recorded under drought treatment with Stockosorb. The actual quantum efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) markedly decreased in both treatments - with and without Stockosorb, though significant differences were found only between control treatments and drought treatment without Stockosorb. Moreover, the thermal energy dissipation (NPQ) was strongly limited under severe drought stress. The capacity to down regulate PSII functionality through non-photochemical quenching was maintained under drought treatment with Stockosorb. The results indicate that an amendment with soil conditioner significantly improved the photosynthetic performance of drought-stressed beech seedlings.

Keywords: Fagus sylvatica L.; chlorophyll a fluorescence; water stress; gas-exchange parameters; stockosorb

Published: October 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jamnická G, Ditmarová ¥, Kurjak D, Kme» J, P¹idová E, Macková M, et al.. The soil hydrogel improved photosynthetic performance of beech seedlings treated under drought. Plant Soil Environ. 2013;59(10):446-451. doi: 10.17221/170/2013-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Arbona V., Iglesias D.J., Jacas J., Primo-Millo E., Talon M., GomezCadenas A. (2005): Hydrogel substrate amendment alleviates drought effects on young citrus plants. Plant and Soil, 270: 73-82. Go to original source...
  2. Baker N.R., Rosenquist E. (2004): Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: An examination of future possibilities. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55: 1607-1621. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Baquedano F.J., Castillo F.J. (2006): Comparative ecophysiological effects of drought on seedlings of the Mediterranean watersaver Pinus halepensis and water-spenders Quercus coccifera and Quercus ilex. Trees, 20: 689-700. Go to original source...
  4. Beniwal R.S., Hooda M.S., Polle A. (2011): Amelioration of planting stress by soil amendment with a hydrogel-mycorrhiza mixture for early establishment of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings. Annals of Forest Science, 68: 803-810. Go to original source...
  5. Bhardwaj A.K., Shainberg I., Goldstein D., Warrington D.N., Levy G.J. (2007): Water retention and hydraulic conductivity of cross-linked polyacrylamides in sandy soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71: 406-412. Go to original source...
  6. Breda N., Huc R., Granier A., Dreyer E. (2006): Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: A review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Annals of Forest Science, 63: 625-644. Go to original source...
  7. Bredemeier M., Cohen S., Godbold D.L., Lode E., Pichler V., Schleppi P. (eds.) (2011): Forest Management and the Water Cycle. An Ecosystem-Based Approach. Ecological Studies 212, Springer, Dordrecht. Go to original source...
  8. Chirino E., Vilagrosa A., Vallejo V.R. (2011): Using hydrogel and clay to improve the water status of seedlings for dryland restoration. Plant and Soil, 344: 99-110. Go to original source...
  9. Colom M.R., Vazzana C. (2003): Photosynthesis and PSII functionality of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 49: 135-144. Go to original source...
  10. Fotelli M.N., Nahm M., Radoglou K., Rennenberg H., Halyvopoulus G., Matzarakis A. (2009): Seasonal and interannual ecophysiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) at its south-eastern distribution limit in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 257: 1157-1164. Go to original source...
  11. Foyer C.H., Noctor G. (2000): Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: Regulation and signaling. New Phytologist, 146: 359-388. Go to original source...
  12. Grassi G., Magnani F. (2005): Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees. Plant, Cell and Environment, 28: 834-849. Go to original source...
  13. Heschel M.S., Donohue K., Hausmann N., Schmitt J. (2002): Population differentiation and natural selection for water-use efficiency in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). International Journal of Plant Science, 163: 907-912. Go to original source...
  14. Horton P., Ruban A.V., Walters R.G. (1994): Regulation of light harvesting in green plants. Plant Physiology, 106: 415-420. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Hüttermann A., Zommorodi M., Reise K. (1999): Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil and Tillage Research, 50: 295-304. Go to original source...
  16. Konôpka B., Pajtík J., Moravèík M., Lukac M. (2010): Biomass partitioning and growth efficiency in four naturally regenerated forest tree species. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 394-405. Go to original source...
  17. Konôpka B., Lukac M. (2013): Moderate drought alters biomass and depth distribution of fine roots in Norway spruce. Forest Pathology, 43: 115-123. Go to original source...
  18. Koupai J.A., Eslamian S.S., Kazemi J.A. (2008): Enhancing the available water content in unsaturated soil zone using hydrogel, to improve plant growth indices. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 8: 67-75. Go to original source...
  19. Li G.L., Wu H.X., Sun Y.Q., Zhang S.Y. (2013): Response of chlo rophyll fluorescence parameters to drought stress in sugar beet seedlings. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 60: 337-342. Go to original source...
  20. Maxwell K., Johnson G.N. (2000): Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51: 659-668. Go to original source...
  21. Santos C.M., Verissimo V., Wanderley Filho H.C. de L., Ferreira V.M., Cavalcante P.G. da S., Rolim E.V., Endres L. (2013): Seasonal variations of photosynthesis, gas exchange, quantum effi ciency of photosystem II and biochemical responses of Jatropha curcas L. grown in semi-humid and semi-arid areas subject to water stress. Industrial Crops and Products, 41: 203-213. Go to original source...
  22. Osmond C.B. (1994): What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants. In: Baker N.R., Bowyer J.R. (eds.): Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis. BIOS Scientific, Oxford, 1-24.
  23. Roldan A., Querejeta I., Albaladejo J., Castillo V. (1996): Survival and growth of Pinus halepensis Miller seedlings in a semi-arid environment after forest soil transfer, terracing and organic amendments. Annals of Forest Science, 53: 1099-1112. Go to original source...
  24. Sánchez-Gómez D., Robson T.M., Gascó A., Gil-Pelegrín E., Aranda I. (2013): Differences in the leaf functional traits of six beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) populations are reflected in their response to water limitation. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 87: 110-119. Go to original source...
  25. Sarva¹ M., Pavlenda P., Takáèová E. (2007): Effect of hydrogel application on survival and growth of pine seedlings in reclamations. Journal of Forest Science, 53: 204-209. Go to original source...
  26. Shi Y., Li J., Shao J., Deng S., Wang R., Li N., Sun J., Zhang H., Zhu H., Zhang Y., Zheng X., Zhou D., Hüttermann A., Chen S. (2010): Effects of Stockosorb and Luquasorb polymers on salt and drought tolerance of Populus popularis. Scientia Horticulturae, 124: 268-273. Go to original source...
  27. Silva E.V., Fereira-Silva S.L., Fontenele A.V., Ribeiro R.V., Viégas R.A., Silveira A.G. (2010): Photosynthetic changes and protective mechanisms against oxidative damage subjected to isolated and combined drought and heat stresses in Jatropha curcas plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167: 1157-1164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Varone L., Ribas-Carbo M., Cardona C., Gallé A., Medrano H., Gratani L., Flexas J. (2012): Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis in seedlings and saplings of Mediterranean species pre-conditioned and aged in nurseries: Different response to water stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 75: 235-247. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.