Plant Soil Environ., 2017, 63(4):145-151 | DOI: 10.17221/761/2016-PSE

Cytoplasmic male sterility as a biological confinement tool for maize coexistence: optimization of pollinator spatial arrangementOriginal Paper

Heidrun BÜCKMANN1, Gemma CAPELLADES2, Kateĝina HAMOUZOVÁ3, Josef HOLEC3, Josef SOUKUP3, Joaquima MESSEGUER4, Enric Melé4, Anna NADAL5, Xavier Piferrer GUILLEN5, Maria PLA5, Joan SERRA2, Katja THIELE*,6, Joachim SCHIEMANN6
1 Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Julius Kühn-Institut, Braunschweig, Germany
2 Mas Badia Foundation, Girona, Spain
3 Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
4 Institute for Food and Agricultural Research and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
5 Institute for Agricultural and Food Technology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
6 Institute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Julius Kühn-Institut, Quedlinburg, Germany

Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) allows efficient biological confinement of transgenes if pollen-mediated gene flow has to be reduced or eliminated. For introduction of CMS maize in agricultural practice, sufficient yields comparable with conventional systems should be achieved. The plus-cultivar-system in maize offers a possibility for biological confinement together with high and stable yields whereas pollinator amount and distribution within the CMS crop is crucial. The aim of this EU-funded study was to identify the best proportion (10, 15, and 20%) and spatial arrangement (inserted rows, mixed seeds) of the pollinator within the CMS maize cultivar under field conditions in the Czech Republic, in Germany and in Spain. In Germany and in the Czech Republic, a pollinator proportion of 10% produced significantly lower yield than the treatments with a pollinator proportion of 15% and 20%. Differences in yield between row and mix arrangements were not detected. No differences between the tested arrangements occurred in Spain. With respect to practical conditions, a pollinator proportion of 15% can be recommended for achieving a satisfactory yield. CMS maize cultivar released no or merely a small amount of pollen and self-pollinated plants developed no or only a small number of kernels indicating that currently recommended isolation distances between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM fields can be substantially shortened if the CMS confinement tool is used.

Keywords: genetically modified maize; outcrossing potential; spatial distribution

Published: April 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BÜCKMANN H, CAPELLADES G, HAMOUZOVÁ K, HOLEC J, SOUKUP J, MESSEGUER J, et al.. Cytoplasmic male sterility as a biological confinement tool for maize coexistence: optimization of pollinator spatial arrangement. Plant Soil Environ. 2017;63(4):145-151. doi: 10.17221/761/2016-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Bückmann H., Hüsken A., Schiemann J. (2013): Applicability of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) as a reliable biological confinement method for the cultivation of genetically modified maize in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A, 3: 385-403.
  2. Budar F., Touzet P., De Paepe R. (2003): The nucleo-mitochondrial conflict in cytoplasmic male sterilities revisited. Genetica, 117: 3-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Chase C.D., Gabay-Laughnan S. (2004): Cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration by nuclear genes. In: Daniell H., Chase C.D. (eds.): Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of Plant Organelles. Dordrecht, Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
  4. Chase C.D. (2006): Genetically engineered cytoplasmic male sterility. Trends in Plant Sciences, 11: 7-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Duvick D.N. (1965): Cytoplasmic pollen sterility in corn. Advances in Genetics, 13: 1-56. Go to original source...
  6. Feil B., Stamp P. (2002): Pollen-mediated flow of transgenes in maize can already be controlled by cytoplasmic male sterility. AgBiotechNet, 4: 1-4.
  7. Feil B., Weingartner U., Stamp P. (2003): Controlling the release of pollen from genetically modified maize and increasing its grain yield by growing mixtures of male-sterile and male-fertile plants. Euphytica, 130: 163-165. Go to original source...
  8. Gabay-Laughnan S., Zabala G., Laughnan J.R. (1995): S-type cytoplasmic male sterility in maize. In: Levings C.S., Vasil I.K. (eds): The Molecular Biology of Plant Mitochondria. Derdrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 395-432. Go to original source...
  9. Gabay Laughnan S. (1997): Late reversion events can mimic imprinting of restorer-of-fertility genes in CMS-S [S-type malesterile cytoplasm] maize [Zea mays]. Maydica, 42: 163-172.
  10. Kiesselbach T.A. (1960): The significance of xenia effects on the kernel weight of corn. Bulletin of the Agricultural Experimental Station of Nebraska, 191: 1-30.
  11. Laser K.D., Lersten N.R. (1972): Anatomy and cytology of microsporogenesis in cytoplasmic male sterile angiosperms. The Botanical Review, 38: 425-454. Go to original source...
  12. Munsch M., Camp K.-H., Stamp P., Weider C. (2008): Modern maize hybrids can improve grain yield as plus-hybrids by the combined effects of cytoplasmic male sterility and allo-pollination. Maydica, 53: 261-268.
  13. Munsch M. (2009): Yield potential of modern European Plus-Hybrids and relevance of genetic diversity for xenia in maize (Zea mays L.). [Ph.D. thesis] Zürich, Federal Institute of Technology.
  14. Munsch M.A., Stamp P., Christov N.K., Foueillassar X.M., Hüsken A., Camp K.-H., Weider C. (2010): Grain yield increase and pollen containment by Plus-Hybrids could improve acceptance of transgenic maize. Crop Science, 50: 909-919. Go to original source...
  15. Schenkelaars P., Wesseler J. (2016): Farm-level GM coexistence policies in the EU: Context, concepts and developments. EuroChoices, 15: 5-11. Go to original source...
  16. Schnable P.S., Wise R.P. (1998): The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration. Trends in Plant Sciences, 3: 175-180. Go to original source...
  17. Sofi P.A., Rather A.G., Wani S.A. (2007): Genetic and molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility in maize. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science, 2: 49-60.
  18. Stamp P., Chowchong S., Menzi M., Weingartner U., Kaeser O. (2000): Increase in the yield of cytoplasmic male sterile maize revisited. Crop Science, 40: 1586-1587. Go to original source...
  19. Thomison P.R., Geyer A.B. (1999): Evaluation of TC Blends® used in high oil maize production. Plant Varieties and Seeds, 12: 99-112.
  20. Thomison P.R., Geyer A.B., Lotz L.D., Siegrist H.J., Dobbels T.L. (2002): TopCross high-oil corn production: Agronomic performance. Agronomy Journal, 94: 290-299. Go to original source...
  21. Venus T.J., Dillen K., Punt M.J., Wesseler J.H.H. (2016): The costs of coexistence measures for genetically modified maize in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics. doi: 10.1111/14779552.12178 Go to original source...
  22. Weingartner U., Kaeser O., Long M., Stamp P. (2002): Combining cytoplasmic male sterility and xenia increases grain yield of maize hybrids. Crop Science, 42: 1848-1856. Go to original source...
  23. Weingartner U., Camp K.-H., Stamp P. (2004): Impact of male sterility and xenia on grain quality traits of maize. European Journal of Agronomy, 21: 239-247. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.