Plant Soil Environ., 2017, 63(12):574-580 | DOI: 10.17221/590/2017-PSE

Which of soil microbes is in positive correlation to yields of maize (Zea mays L.)?Original Paper

Zhongyou MA1, Yue XIE1,2, Lin ZHU3, Liang CHENG1, Xin XIAO1, Cheng ZHOU*,1,4, Jianfei WANG*,1
1 Key Laboratory of Bio-organic Fertilizer Creation, Ministry of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, P.R. China
2 Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA
3 School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China
4 Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization in Low-Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, P.R. China

Soil microorganisms are critical to maintain soil function, enhance plant health and increase crop yields. This study investigated the effects of organic matter on soil microbial community and assessed which of soil microbes were in positive correlation to maize yields. The results showed that different fertilizer treatments shaped specific microbial communities in the same soils. The most abundant beneficial soil microbes were found in treatments with organic fertilizer produced from cattle manure, return of wheat straw and 70% NPK admixture fertilizers treatment. The correlation analysis revealed that maize yields were in no correlation both to the shifts of soil microbial community structure and to the number of sequences or operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in soil microbes. However, maize yields were in positive correlation to microbial community structure shifts at the species level. 35 bacteria OTUs from 19 orders in 14 classes in 9 phyla were in positive correlation to yields of maize, while in fungi only one OTU25 belonging to Sordariales was in positive correlation. Our results indicate that the long-term application of organic and inorganic amendments could enrich the soil bacterial and fungal community and promote its diversity.

Keywords: soil microbiome; plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria; corn field; mineral fertilizer

Published: December 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zhongyou M, XIE Y, ZHU L, CHENG L, XIAO X, ZHOU C, WANG J. Which of soil microbes is in positive correlation to yields of maize (Zea mays L.)? Plant Soil Environ. 2017;63(12):574-580. doi: 10.17221/590/2017-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Arun A.B., Schumann P., Chu H.I., Tan C.C., Chen W.M., Lai W.A., Kämpfer P., Shen F.T., Rekha P.D., Hung H.M., Chou J.H., Young C.C. (2008): Pseudoxanthobacter soli gen. nov., sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing alphaproteobacterium isolated from soil. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 58: 1571-1575. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Cai F., Chen W., Wei Z., Pang G., Li R.X., Ran W., Shen Q.R. (2015): Colonization of Trichoderma harzianum strain SQR-T037 on tomato roots and its relationship to plant growth, nutrient availability and soil microflora. Plant and Soil, 388: 337-350. Go to original source...
  3. Cao Z.P., Han X.M., Hu C., Chen J., Zhang D.P., Steinberger Y. (2011): Changes in the abundance and structure of a soil mite (Acari) community under long-term organic and chemical fertilizer treatments. Applied Soil Ecology, 49: 131-138. Go to original source...
  4. Carreiro M.M., Sinsabaugh R.L., Repert D.A. Parkhurst D.F. (2000): Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology, 81: 2359-2365. Go to original source...
  5. Chauhan P.S., Chaudhry V., Mishra S., Nautiyal C.S. (2011): Uncultured bacterial diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) rhizosphere. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 51: 15-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Doran J.W., Zeiss M.R. (2000): Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology, 15: 3-11. Go to original source...
  7. Gholami A., Biyari A., Gholipoor M., Rahmani H.A. (2012): Growth promotion of maize (Zea mays L.) by plant-growthpromoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43: 1263-1272. Go to original source...
  8. Kamaa M., Mburu H., Blanchart E., Chibole L., Chotte J.-L., Kibunja C., Lesueur D. (2011): Effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil bacterial and fungal microbial diversity in the Kabete long-term trial, Kenya. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47: 315-321. Go to original source...
  9. Kodama Y., Watanabe K. (2011): Rhizomicrobium electricum sp. nov., a facultatively anaerobic, fermentative, prosthecate bacterium isolated from a cellulose-fed microbial fuel cell. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 61: 1781-1785. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Li F., Liang W., Zhang X., Jiang Y., Wang J. (2008): Changes in soil microbial biomass and bacterial community in a long-term fertilization experiment during the growth of maize. Advances in Environmental Biology, 2: 1-8.
  11. Lundberg D.S., Lebeis S.L., Paredes S.H., Yourstone S., Gehring J., Malfatti S., Tremblay J., Engelbrektson A., Kunin V., Glavina del Rio T., Edgar R.C., Eickhorst T., Ley R.E., Hugenholtz P., Tringe S.G., Dangl J.L. (2012): Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature, 488: 86-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Mallarino A.P., Borges R. (2006): Phosphorus and potassium distribution in soil following long-term deep-band fertilization in different tillage systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70: 702-707. Go to original source...
  13. Pernes-Debuyser A., Tessier D. (2004): Soil physical properties affected by long-term fertilization. European Journal of Soil Science, 55: 505-512. Go to original source...
  14. Reding H.K., Hartel P.G., Wiegel J. (1991): Effect of Xanthobacter, isolated and characterized from rice roots, on growth of wetland rice. Plant and Soil, 138: 221-229. Go to original source...
  15. Sinsabaugh R.L., Follstad Shah J.J. (2011): Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of recalcitrant organic matter decomposition: The growth rate hypothesis in reverse. Biogeochemistry, 102: 31-43. Go to original source...
  16. Ueki A., Kodama Y., Kaku N., Shiromura T., Satoh A., Watanabe K., Ueki K. (2010): Rhizomicrobium palustre gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultatively anaerobic, fermentative stalked bacterium in the class Alphaproteobacteria isolated from rice plant roots. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 56: 193-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Vega-Avila A.D., Gumiere T., Andrade P.A., Lima-Perim J.E., Durrer A., Baigori M., Vazquez F., Andreote F.D. (2015): Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of Vitis vinifera L. cultivated under distinct agricultural practices in Argentina. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 107: 575-588. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Zhao K., Penttinen P., Zhang X.P., Ao X.L., Liu M.K., Yu X.M., Chen Q. (2014): Maize rhizosphere in Sichuan, China, hosts plant growth promoting Burkholderia cepacia with phosphate solubilizing and antifungal abilities. Microbiological Research, 169: 76-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.