Plant Soil Environ., 2019, 65(3):111-117 | DOI: 10.17221/776/2018-PSE

Trends in the variability of potato tuber yield under selected land and soil characteristicsOriginal Paper

Mahnaz Zare1, Aitazaz A. Farooque1, Farhat Abbas*,2, Qamar Zaman3, Melanie Bos1
1 Facultyof Sustainable Design Engineering, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada
2 Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
3 Department of Engineering, Agricultural Campus, Dalhousie University, Truro, Canada

The objective of this study was to evaluate variations in potato tuber yield with the selected land and soil characteristics including (i) topography (elevation and slope); (ii) geometry (horizontal coplanar geometry (HCP)and perpendicular coplanar geometry (PRP)); (iii) hydrology (volumetric moisture content; θv), and (iv) chemistry (phosphate, potash, organic carbon; organic carbon and pH). Analyses of the data collected across four potato fields, two each in Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick (NB), showed that the tuber yield negatively correlated with the field slope and positively correlated with most of the soil characteristics studied. Field elevation affected yield only under certain conditions such as higher range of elevation (≥ 7 m) (Field 2 in NB). Among soil characteristics, only HCP and PRP correlated with field elevation. The slope and elevation explained 22% to 36% variability of yield. Investigations of yield and topography by zonal analysis showed that yield was lower in zones of higher slope or elevation and lower θv, as the mean θv decreased in zones with a higher slope.

Keywords: Atlantic Canada; Solanum tuberosum L.; land surface; site-specific crop management; precision agriculture

Published: March 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zare M, Farooque AA, Abbas F, Zaman Q, Bos M. Trends in the variability of potato tuber yield under selected land and soil characteristics. Plant Soil Environ. 2019;65(3):111-117. doi: 10.17221/776/2018-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Afyuni M.M., Cassel D.K., Robarge W.P. (1993): Effect of landscape position on soil water and corn silage yield. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57: 1573-1580. Go to original source...
  2. AAFC (Agriculture and Agri-food Canada) (2017): Potato Market Information Review, 2015-2016. Available at: http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/industry-markets-and-trade/market-information-bysector/horticulture/horticulture-sector-reports/potato-marketinformation-review-2015-2016 (accessed 9.4.2018)
  3. Bakhsh A., Colvin T.S., Jaynes D.B., Kanwar R.S., Tim U.S. (2000): Using soil attributes and GIS for interpretation of spatial variability in yield. Transactions of the ASAE, 43: 819-828. Go to original source...
  4. Day L.D., Collins M.E., Washer N.E. (1987): Landscape position and particle-size effects on soil phosphorus distributions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51: 1547-1553. Go to original source...
  5. Grzebisz W., Potarzycki J., Biber M. (2018): The early prognosis of tuber yield based on nitrogen status in potato tops. Plant, Soil and Environment, 64: 539-545. Go to original source...
  6. Iqbal J., Read J.J., Thomasson A.J., Jenkins J.N. (2004): Relationships between soil-landscape and dryland cotton lint yield. Soil Scince Society of America Journal, 69: 1-11. Go to original source...
  7. Jaynes D.B., Kaspar T.C., Colvin T.S., James D.E. (2003): Cluster analysis of spatiotemporal corn yield patterns in an Iowa field. Agronomy Journal, 95: 574-586. Go to original source...
  8. Kitchen N.R., Drummond S.T., Lund E.D., Sudduth K.A., Buchleiter G.W. (2003): Soil electrical conductivity and topography related to yield for three contrasting soil-crop systems. Agronomy Journal, 95: 483-495. Go to original source...
  9. Kravchenko A.N., Bullock D.G. (2000): Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agronomy Journal, 92: 75-83. Go to original source...
  10. Kravchenko A.N., Bullock D.G. (2002): Spatial variability of soybean quality data as a function of field topography: I. Spatial data analysis. Crop Science, 42: 804-815. Go to original source...
  11. Kravchenko A.N., Bullock D.G., Boast C.W. (2000): Joint multifractal analysis of crop yield and terrain slope. Agronomy Journal, 92: 1279-1290. Go to original source...
  12. Kumhálová J., Kumhála F., Kroulík M., Matějková Š. (2011): The impact of topography on soil properties and yield and the effects of weather conditions. Precision Agriculture, 12: 813-830. Go to original source...
  13. Kumhálová J., Matějková Š., Fifernová M., Lipavský J., Kumhála F. (2008): Topography impact on nutrition content in soil and yield. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54: 255-261. Go to original source...
  14. Spomer R.G., Piest R.F. (1982): Soil productivity and erosion of Iowa Loess soils. Transactions of the ASAE, 25: 1295-1299. Go to original source...
  15. Wang J., Wanq H., Cao Y., Bai Z., Qin Q. (2016): Effects of soil and topographic factors on vegetation restoration in opencast coal mine dumps located in a loess area. Scientific Reports, 6: 22058. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.