Plant Soil Environ., 2019, 65(6):290-297 | DOI: 10.17221/72/2019-PSE

Evaluation of DualEM-II sensor for soil moisture content estimation in the potato fields of Atlantic CanadaOriginal Paper

Aitazaz A. Farooque1, Mahnaz Zare1, Farhat Abbas*,1,4, Qamar Zaman2, Melanie Bos1, Travis Esau2, Bishnu Acharya1, Arnold W. Schumann3
1 Faculty of Sustainable Design Engineering, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada
2 Department of Engineering, Agricultural Campus, Dalhousie University, Truro, Canada
3 Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, USA
4 Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

The conventional gravimetric methods of estimating soil moisture content (θ) are laborious, time-consuming, and destructive to agricultural fields. We evaluated the performance of DualEM-II sensor in non-destructive way of θ prediction and for predicting θ variations within potato fields in Atlantic Canada. Values of θ were measured from four potato fields in New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island using a pre-calibrated (R2 = 0.98) time domain reflectometry (TDR) from root zone of potato tubers under grid sampling arrangements. Horizontal co-planar (HCP) and perpendicular co-planar (PRP) readings were taken using DualEM-II sensor from the same locations of θ measurements. There was a better correlation between PRP and θ (r: 0.64-0.83) was calculated than between HCP and θ (r: 0.41-0.79). There was no significant difference (R2: 0.60-0.69; RMSE (root mean square error): 2.32-4.02) between the θ values measured with TDR (θM) and those predicted with DualEM-II (θP) confirming that the use of electromagnetic induction technique, evaluated during this study, is labor saving, quick, non-destructive, and accurate and can be considered a precision agriculture tool for efficiently managing soil water in potato fields.

Keywords: irrigation management; monitoring water stress; precision farming; soil variability; tuberous crop

Published: June 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Farooque AA, Zare M, Abbas F, Zaman Q, Bos M, Esau T, et al.. Evaluation of DualEM-II sensor for soil moisture content estimation in the potato fields of Atlantic Canada. Plant Soil Environ. 2019;65(6):290-297. doi: 10.17221/72/2019-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Agriculture and Agri Food Canada (2017): Potato Marketing and Cost of Productions. Ottawa, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Available at http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/industry-markets-and-trade/canadian-agri-food-sector-intelligence/horticulture/horticulturesector-reports/potato-market-information-review-2015-2016/?id=1500402297688#a1.1 (accessed on May 27, 2019)
  2. Bogena H., Herbst M., Huisman J.A., Rosenbaum U., Weuthen A., Vereecken H. (2010): Potential of wireless sensor networks for measuring soil water content variability. Vadose Zone Journal, 9: 1002-1013. Go to original source...
  3. Council W.P. (2003): Potato Market Information Review, 2015-2016. Ottawa, Government of Canada.
  4. Callegary J.B., Ferré T.P.A., Groom R.W. (2007): Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic induction instruments. Vadose Zone Journal, 6: 158-167. Go to original source...
  5. Elzner P., Jůzl M., Kasal P. (2018): Effect of different drip irrigation regimes on tuber and starch yield of potatoes. Plant, Soil and Environment, 64: 546-550. Go to original source...
  6. Escuredo O., Seijo-Rodriguez A., Rodríguez-Flores M.S., Míguez M., Seijo M.C. (2018): Influence of weather conditions on the physicochemical characteristics of potato tubers. Plant, Soil and Environment, 64: 317-323. Go to original source...
  7. Fares A., Alva A.K. (2000): Evaluation of capacitance probes for optimal irrigation of citrus through soil moisture monitoring in an entisol profile. Irrigation Science, 19: 57-64. Go to original source...
  8. Farooque A.A., Zaman Q.U., Schumann A.W., Madani A., Percival D.C. (2012): Response of wild blueberry yield to spatial variability of soil properties. Soil Science, 177: 56-68. Go to original source...
  9. Government of Canada (2018): Monthly Climate Summaries. Gatineau, Environment and Climate Change Canada. Available at: http://climate.weather.gc.ca/prods_servs/cdn_climate_summary_e.html
  10. Huang J.Y., McBratney A.B., Minasny B., Triantafilis J. (2017): Monitoring and modelling soil water dynamics using electromagnetic conductivity imaging and the ensemble Kalman filter. Geoderma, 285: 76-93. Go to original source...
  11. Kachanoski R.G., Van Wesenbeeck I.J., Gregorich E.G. (1988): Estimating spatial variations of soil water content using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive methods. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 68: 715-722. Go to original source...
  12. Kerry R., Oliver M.A. (2003): Variograms of ancillary data to aid sampling for soil surveys. Precision Agriculture, 4: 261-278. Go to original source...
  13. Kitchen N.R., Sudduth K.A., Drummond S.T. (1999): Soil electrical conductivity as a crop productivity measure for claypan soils. Journal of Production Agriculture, 12: 607. Go to original source...
  14. Kodikara J., Rajeev P., Chan D., Gallage C. (2013): Soil moisture monitoring at the field scale using neutron probe. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51: 332-345. Go to original source...
  15. Le T., Pék Z., Takács S., Neményi A., Helyes L. (2018): The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on yield, water use efficiency and Brix Degree of processing tomato. Plant, Soil and Environment, 64: 523-529. Go to original source...
  16. Lynch D.R., Foroud N., Kozub G.C., Fames B.C. (1995): The effect of moisture stress at three growth stages on the yield, components of yield and processing quality of eight potato varieties. American Potato Journal, 72: 375-385. Go to original source...
  17. Martini E., Wollschläger U., Kögler S., Behrens T., Dietrich P., Reinstorf F., Schmidt K., Weiler M., Werban U., Zacharias S. (2015): Spatial and temporal dynamics of hillslope-scale soil moisture patterns: Characteristic states and transition mechanisms. Vadose Zone Journal, 14: 16. Go to original source...
  18. McKenzie C., Woods S.A. (2006): Potential of precision farming with potatoes. In: Srinivasan A. (ed.): Handbook of Precision Agriculture: Principles and Applications. New York, Food Products Press, 379-391.
  19. McNeill J.D. (1980): Electromagnetic Terrain Conductivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers. Mississauga, Technical Note TN-6. Geonics Ltd.
  20. Rhoades J.D., Manteghi N.A., Shouse P.J., Alves W.J. (1989): Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: New formulations and calibrations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53: 433. Go to original source...
  21. Robinson D.A., Lebron I., Lesch S.M., Shouse P. (2004): Minimizing drift in electrical conductivity measurements in high temperature environments using the EM-38. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68: 339. Go to original source...
  22. Rodríguez-Pérez J.R., Plant R.E., Lambert J.-J., Smart D.R. (2011): Using apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) to characterize vineyard soils of high clay content. Precision Agriculture, 12: 775-794. Go to original source...
  23. Sadler E.J., Evans R.G., Stone K.C., Camp C.R. (2005): Opportunities for conservation with precision irrigation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 60: 371-378.
  24. Schumann A.W., Zaman Q.U. (2003): Mapping water table depth by electromagnetic induction. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 19: 675-688. Go to original source...
  25. Singh G., Williard K.W.J., Schoonover J.E. (2016): Spatial relation of apparent soil electrical conductivity with crop yields and soil properties at different topographic positions in a small agricultural watershed. Agronomy, 6: 57. Go to original source...
  26. Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Wiebold W.J., Batchelor W.D., Bollero G.A., Bullock D.G., Clay D.E., Palm H.L., Pierce F.J., Schuler R.T., Thelen K.D. (2005): Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46: 263-283. Go to original source...
  27. Terry N., Day-Lewis F.D., Werkema D., Jr J.W.L. (2018): MoisturEC: A New R Program for Moisture Content Estimation from Electrical Conductivity Data. Hoboken, John Wiley and Sons. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12650 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Ward E.R. (1988): Irrigation in relationship to disease incidence and tuber quality after storage. In: Carr M.K., Hamer P.J. (eds.): Irrigation Potatoes. Bedford, Cranfield Press, 41-49.
  29. Wait J.R. (1962): A note on the electromagnetic response of a stratified earth. Geophysics. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439028. Go to original source...
  30. Wraith J.M., Robinson D.A., Jones S.B., Long D.S. (2005): Spatially characterizing apparent electrical conductivity and water content of surface soils with time domain reflectometry. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46: 239-261. Go to original source...
  31. Zrcková M., Capouchová I., Eliáąová M., Paznocht L., Pazderů K., Dvořák P., Konvalina P., Orsák M., ©těrba Z. (2018): The effect of genotype, weather conditions and cropping system on antioxidant activity and content of selected antioxidant compounds in wheat with coloured grain. Plant, Soil and Environment, 64: 530-538. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.