Plant Soil Environ., 2020, 66(11):584-589 | DOI: 10.17221/257/2020-PSE

Physical disturbance accelerates carbon loss through increasing labile carbon releaseOriginal Paper

Xiuwei Zhang*,1,2, Feihai Yu1
1 Instituteof Wetland Ecology and Clone Ecology/Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation, Taizhou University, Taizhou, P.R. China
2 Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, P.R. China

Labile carbon (C) is a major source of C loss because of its high vulnerability to environmental change. Yet its potential role in regulating soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics remains unclear. In this study, we tested the effect of physical disturbance on SOC decomposition using soils from two abandoned farmlands free of management practice for more than 28 years. The soil respiration rate was measured in undisturbed and disturbed soil columns and was inversely modeled using the two-compartment model. We found that the C loss was 16.8~74.1% higher in disturbed than in undisturbed soil columns. Physical disturbance increased the total amount of labile C (C1) loss by 136~241%, while had no effect on the kinetic decomposition rate constants of both labile (k1) and stable (k2) SOC decomposition. Physical disturbance fragmented the large macroaggregates into small macroaggregates, microaggregates, and free silt and clay-sized fractions. This indicates that C loss was derived from the initially protected labile C, and there was no change of SOC fraction being decomposed. Our results give insights into the understanding of the extent of labile C loss to physical disruption and demonstrate the potential effect of physical disturbance on SOC dynamics.

Keywords: carbon model; organic carbon decomposition; physical protection; soil incubation; soil organic matter

Published: November 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zhang X, Yu F. Physical disturbance accelerates carbon loss through increasing labile carbon release. Plant Soil Environ. 2020;66(11):584-589. doi: 10.17221/257/2020-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. An S.S., Darboux F., Cheng M. (2013): Revegetation as an efficient means of increasing soil aggregate stability on the Loess Plateau (China). Geoderma, 209-210: 75-85. Go to original source...
  2. Christensen B.T. (2001): Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover. European Journal of Soil Science, 52: 345-353. Go to original source...
  3. Davidson E.A., Janssens I.A. (2006): Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440: 165-173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Drury C.F., Yang X.M., Reynolds W.D., Tan C.S. (2004): Influence of crop rotation and aggregate size on carbon dioxide production and denitrification. Soil and Tillage Research, 79: 87-100. Go to original source...
  5. Godde C.M., Thorburn P.J., Biggs J.S., Meier E.A. (2016): Understanding the impacts of soil, climate, and farming practices on soil organic carbon sequestration: a simulation study in Australia. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00661. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Gregorich E.G., Kachanoski R.G., Voroney R.P. (1989): Carbon mineralization in soil size fractions after various amounts of aggregate disruption. European Journal of Soil Science, 40: 649-659. Go to original source...
  7. Hassink J. (1992): Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 14: 126-134. Go to original source...
  8. Kleber M., Eusterhues K., Keiluweit M., Mikutta C., Mikutta R., Nico P.S. (2015): Chapter one - mineral-organic associations: formation, properties, and relevance in soil environments. Advances in Agronomy, 130: 1-140. Go to original source...
  9. Krull E.S., Baldock J.A., Skjemstad J.O. (2003): Importance of mechanisms and processes of the stabilisation of soil organic matter for modelling carbon turnover. Functional Plant Biology, 30: 207-222. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lehmann J., Kleber M. (2015): The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 528: 60-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lin J.J., Zhu B., Cheng W.X. (2015): Decadally cycling soil carbon is more sensitive to warming than faster-cycling soil carbon. Global Change Biology, 21: 4602-4612. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Luo Z.K., Baldock J., Wang E.L. (2017): Modelling the dynamic physical protection of soil organic carbon: insights into carbon predictions and explanation of the priming effect. Global Change Biology, 23: 5273-5283. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Rey A., Jarvis P. (2006): Modelling the effect of temperature on carbon mineralization rates across a network of European forest sites (FORCAST). Global Change Biology, 12: 1894-1908. Go to original source...
  14. Six J., Paustian K. (2014): Aggregate-associated soil organic matter as an ecosystem property and a measurement tool. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68: A4-A9. Go to original source...
  15. Sollins P., Homann P., Caldwell B.A. (1996): Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls. Geoderma, 74: 65-105. Go to original source...
  16. Somasundaram J., Chaudhary R.S., Awanish Kumar D., Biswas A.K., Sinha N.K., Mohanty M., Hati K.M., Jha P., Sankar M., Patra A.K., Dalal R., Chaudhari S.K. (2018): Effect of contrasting tillage and cropping systems on soil aggregation, carbon pools and aggregate-associated carbon in rainfed Vertisols. European Journal of Soil Science, 69: 879-891. Go to original source...
  17. Tian J., Pausch J., Yu G.R., Blagodatskaya E., Gao Y., Kuzyakov Y. (2015): Aggregate size and their disruption affect 14C-labeled glucose mineralization and priming effect. Applied Soil Ecology, 90: 1-10. Go to original source...
  18. Zakharova A., Beare M.H., Cieraad E., Curtin D., Turnbull M.H., Millard P. (2015): Factors controlling labile soil organic matter vulnerability to loss following disturbance as assessed by measurement of soil-respired δ13CO2. European Journal of Soil Science, 66: 135-144. Go to original source...
  19. Zakharova A., Midwood A.J., Hunt J.E., Graham S.L., Artz R.R.E., Turnbull M.H., Whitehead D., Millard P. (2014): Loss of labile carbon following soil disturbance determined by measurement of respired δ13CO2. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68: 125-132. Go to original source...
  20. Zhang X.W., Han X.Z., Yu W.T., Wang P., Cheng W.X. (2017): Priming effects on labile and stable soil organic carbon decomposition: pulse dynamics over two years. PLoS One, 12: e0184978. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.