Plant Soil Environ., 2024, 70(4):210-219 | DOI: 10.17221/401/2023-PSE

Characteristic of soil moisture utilisation with different water-sensitive cultivars of summer maize in the North China PlainOriginal Paper

Haoze Zhang1, Mingliang Gao1, Fuying Liu1, Huabin Yuan1, Zhendong Liu1, Mingming Zhang1, Quanqi Li1, Rui Zong1
1 College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai ‘an, P.R. China

Summer maize cultivars are differently sensitive to soil moisture. To better understand the differences in water productivity of summer maize cultivars with different water sensitivity, a field experiment was conducted from 2020 to 2022. Three different water-sensitive summer maize cultivars were selected, including TY808 (high water-sensitive cultivar), DH605 (medium water-sensitive cultivar), and ZD958 (low water-sensitive cultivar). Soil water content (SWC), soil water storage (SWS), water consumption, water use efficiency, and grain yield were determined. The results showed that under rainfed conditions, the SWC of the medium water-sensitive cultivar DH605 in the deep soil layer was 2.1–18.2% lower than TY808 and ZD958, respectively, and the differences were significant in the 12th leaf stage (V12) and vegetative tassel stage (VT). The SWS of the high-water-sensitive cultivar TY808 was 0.7% to 6.4% higher than the other two water-sensitive cultivars from 2020 to 2022. The changes in SWS are related to the spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation. The water consumption of DH605 was higher than TY808 and ZD958 by 5.3% and 7.09% in 2020 and 2.9% and 2.8% in 2021; in 2022, DH605 is 2% higher than ZD958 and 2.8% lower than TY808, respectively. The yield of DH605 was 4.3–10.78% higher than the other two cultivars in the three-year experiment. Additionally, the 1 000-kernel weight of DH605 was the highest in TY808 and ZD958. DH605 has the highest water use efficiency, which was increased by 4.8–14.6% compared to TY808 and ZD958. Through path analysis, we found that the direct path coefficient of SWS in the VT stage on yield reached 0.999, indicating that soil moisture in the VT stage has the greatest impact on yield, followed by the blister stage (R2). In conclusion, our results suggest that the water consumption of summer maize during the VT stage is the highest, and the soil moisture condition in VT significantly affects the grain yield of summer. Planting DH605 in the North China Plain would harvest the maximum grain yield and water productivity.

Keywords: rainfed agriculture; extreme weather events; Zea mays L.; variety selection; high water-efficient agriculture

Received: October 2, 2023; Revised: February 3, 2024; Accepted: February 12, 2024; Prepublished online: March 7, 2024; Published: March 25, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zhang H, Gao M, Liu F, Yuan H, Liu Z, Zhang M, et al.. Characteristic of soil moisture utilisation with different water-sensitive cultivars of summer maize in the North China Plain. Plant Soil Environ. 2024;70(4):210-219. doi: 10.17221/401/2023-PSE.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ashrafi M., Azimi-Moqadam M.R., Moradi P., Mohseni Fard E., Shekari F., Kompany-Zareh M. (2018): Effect of drought stress on metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive thyme. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 132: 391-399. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Chen H., Wang S., Zhu J., Zhang B. (2020): Projected changes in abrupt shifts between dry and wet extremes over China through an ensemble of regional climate model simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 125: e2020JD033894. Go to original source...
    3. Chen X., Huang L., Mao X.Y., Liao Z.W., He Z.L. (2017): A comparative study of the cellular microscopic characteristics and mechanisms of maize seedling damage from superabsorbent polymers. Pedosphere, 27: 274-282. Go to original source...
    4. Du K., Li F.D., Qiao Y.F., Leng P.F., Li Z., Ge J.P., Yang G. (2021): Influence of no-tillage and precipitation pulse on continuous soil respiration of summer maize affected by soil water in the North China Plain. Science of the Total Environment, 766: 144384. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Engelbrecht B., Comita L., Condit R. (2007): Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature, 447: 80-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Ertek A., Şensoy S., Gedik İ., Küçükyumuk C. (2006): Irrigation scheduling based on pan evaporation values for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 81: 159-172. Go to original source...
    7. Fatima Z., Ahmed M., Hussain M., Abbas G., Ul-Allah S., Ahmad S., Ahmed N., Ali M.A., Sarwar G., ul-Haque E., Iqbal P., Hussain S. (2020): The fingerprints of climate warming on cereal crops phenology and adaptation options. Scientific Reports, 10: 18013. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Feng Y., Hao W.P., Gao L.L., Li H.R., Gong D.Z., Cui N.B. (2019): Comparison of maize water consumption at different scales between mulched and non-mulched croplands. Agricultural Water Management, 216: 315-324. Go to original source...
    9. Ge T.D., Sui F.G., Bai L.P., Tong C.L., Sun N.B. (2012): Effects of water stress on growth, biomass partitioning, and water-use efficiency in summer maize (Zea mays L.) throughout the growth cycle. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 34: 1043-1053. Go to original source...
    10. Huang C., Gao Y., Qin A.Z., Liu Z.G., Zhao B., Ning D.F., Ma S.T., Duan A.W., Liu Z.D. (2022): Effects of waterlogging at different stages and durations on maize growth and grain yields. Agricultural Water Management, 261: 107334. Go to original source...
    11. Huang C., Qin A.Z., Gao Y., Ma S.T., Liu Z.G., Zhao B., Ning D.F., Zhang K., Gong W.J., Sun M.Q., Liu Z.D. (2023): Effects of water deficit at different stages on growth and ear quality of waxy maize. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1069551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Huang F.Y., Liu Z.H., Zhang P., Jia Z.K. (2021): Hydrothermal effects on maize productivity with different planting patterns in a rainfed farmland area. Soil and Tillage Research, 205: 104794. Go to original source...
    13. Islam M.R., Kamal M.M., Alam M.A., Hossain J., Soufan W., Skalicky M., Brestic M., Habib-ur-Rahman M., El Sabagh A., Islam M.S. (2021): Physiochemical changes of mung bean Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek in responses to varying irrigation regimes. Horticulturae, 7: 565. Go to original source...
    14. Jaramillo S., Graterol E., Pulver E. (2020): Sustainable transformation of rainfed to irrigated agriculture through water harvesting and smart crop management practices. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4: 437086. Go to original source...
    15. Li Y.B., Tao H.B., Zhang B.C., Huang S.B., Wang P. (2018): Timing of water deficit limits maize kernel setting in association with changes in the source-flow-sink relationship. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 1326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Li Y., Chen H., Feng H., Dong Q., Wu W.J., Zou Y.F., Chau H.W., Siddique K.H.M. (2020b): Influence of straw incorporation on soil water utilization and summer maize productivity: a five-year field study on the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 233: 106106. Go to original source...
    17. Li Y., Yao N., Tang D.X., Chau H.W., Feng H. (2019): Soil water repellency decreases summer maize growth. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 266: 1-11. Go to original source...
    18. Liu W.H., Li Z.T., Li Y., Ye T., Chen S., Liu Y.Q. (2022): Heterogeneous impacts of excessive wetness on maize yields in China: evidence from statistical yields and process-based crop models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 327: 109205. Go to original source...
    19. Ma Y.Z., Kuang N.K., Hong S.Z., Jiao F.L., Liu C.Y., Li Q.Q. (2021): Water productivity of two wheat genotypes in response to no-tillage in the North China Plain. Plant, Soil and Environment, 67: 236-244. Go to original source...
    20. Malhi G.S., Kaur M., Kaushik P. (2021): Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: a review. Sustainability, 13: 1318. Go to original source...
    21. Mei X.R., Zhong X.L., Vincent V., Liu X.Y. (2013): Improving water use efficiency of wheat crop varieties in the North China Plain: review and analysis. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12: 1243-1250. Go to original source...
    22. Omondi C.K., Rientjes T.H.M., Booij M.J., Nelson A.D. (2021): Satellite rainfall bias assessment for crop growth simulation - a case study of maize growth in Kenya. Agricultural Water Management, 258: 107204. Go to original source...
    23. Qi W.Z., Liu H.H., Liu P., Dong S.T., Zhao B.Q., So H.B., Li G., Liu H.D., Zhang J.W., Zhao B. (2012): Morphological and physiological characteris-tics of corn (Zea mays L.) roots from cultivars with different yield potentials. European Journal of Agronomy, 38: 54-63. Go to original source...
    24. Ramesh T., Bolan N.S., Kirkham M.B., Wijesekara H., Kanchikerimath M., Rao C.S., Sandeep S., Rinklebe J., Ok Y.S., Choudhury B.U., Wang H.L., Tang C.X., Wang X.J., Song Z.L., Freeman O.W. (2019): Soil organic carbon dynamics: impact of land use changes and management prac-tices: a review. Advances in Agronomy, 156: 1-107. Go to original source...
    25. Ren B.Z., Yu W.Z., Liu P., Zhao B., Zhang J.W. (2023): Responses of photosynthetic characteristics and leaf senescence in summer maize to simultaneous stresses of waterlogging and shading. Crop Journal, 11: 269-277. Go to original source...
    26. Ren Y.J., Gao C., Han H.F., Li Q.Q. (2018): Response of water use efficiency and carbon emission to no-tillage and winter wheat genotypes in the North China Plain. Science of the Total Environment, 635: 1102-1109. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Rigano M.M., Arena C., Di Matteo A., Sellitto S., Frusciante L., Barone A. (2016): Eco-physiological response to water stress of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive tomato genotypes. Plant Biosystems, 150: 682-691. Go to original source...
    28. Routschek A., Schmidt J., Kreienkamp F. (2014): Impact of climate change on soil erosion - a high-resolution projection on catchment scale until 2100 in Saxony/Germany. Catena, 121: 99-109. Go to original source...
    29. Sinha R., Fritschi F.B., Zandalinas S.I., Mittler R. (2021): The impact of stress combination on reproductive processes in crops. Plant Science, 311: 111007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Sun X.F., Ding Z.S., Wang X.B., Hou H.P., Zhou B.Y., Yue Y., Ma W., Ge J.Z., Wang Z.M., Zhao M. (2017): Subsoiling practices change root distribution and increase post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and yield in summer maize. Plos One, 12: e0174952. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Tang Y., Huang A.N., Wu P.L., Huang D.Q., Xue D.K., Wu Y. (2021): Drivers of summer extreme precipitation events over East China. Geophysical Research Letters, 48: e2021GL093670. Go to original source...
    32. Wei Y.Q., Jin J.L., Jiang S.M., Ning S.W., Cui Y., Zhou Y.L. (2019): Simulated assessment of summer maize drought loss sensitivity in Huaibei Plain, China. Agronomy-Basel, 9: 78. Go to original source...
    33. Wu Y.L., Ma Y., Niu Y., Song X.F., Yu H., Lan W., Kang X.Q. (2021): Warming changed seasonal water uptake patterns of summer maize. Agricultural Water Management, 258: 107210. Go to original source...
    34. Xu R.X., Zhao H.M., Liu G.B., Li Y., Li S.J., Zhang Y.J., Liu N., Ma L. (2022): Alfalfa and silage maize intercropping provide comparable productivity and profitability with lower environmental impacts than the wheat-maize system in the North China plain. Agricultural Systems, 195: 103305. Go to original source...
    35. Yan S.Y., Weng B.S., Jing L.S., Bi W.X., Yan D.H. (2022): Adaptive pathway of summer maize under drought stress: transformation of root morphology and water absorption law. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10: 1020553. Go to original source...
    36. Yang H., Wen Z.R., Huang T.Q., Lu W.P., Lu D.L. (2019): Effects of waterlogging at grain formation stage on starch structure and functionality of waxy maize. Food Chemistry, 294: 187-193. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. Yang X.L., Wang G.Y., Chen Y.Q., Sui P., Steenhuis Pacenka T.S., Siddique K.H.M. (2022): Reduced groundwater use and increased grain production by optimized irrigation scheduling in winter wheat-summer maize double cropping system - a 16-year field study in North China Plain. Field Crops Research, 275: 108364. Go to original source...
    38. Yin B.Z., Hu Z.H., Wang Y.D., Zhao J., Pan Z.H., Zhen W.C. (2021): Effects of optimized subsoiling tillage on field water conservation and summer maize (Zea mays L.) yield in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 247: 106732. Go to original source...
    39. Yin X.G., Jabloun M., Olesen J.E., Ozturk I., Wang M., Chen F. (2016a): Effects of climatic factors, drought risk and irrigation requirement on maize yield in the Northeast Farming Region of China. Journal of Agricultural Science, 154: 1171-1189. Go to original source...
    40. Yu S.B., Khan S., Mo F., Ren A.X., Lin W., Feng Y., Dong S.F., Ren J., Wang W.X., Noor H., Yang Z.P., Sun M., Gao Z.Q. (2021): Determining optimal nitrogen input rate on the base of fallow season precipitation to achieve higher crop water productivity and yield. Agricultural Water Management, 246: 106689. Go to original source...
    41. Zhang G.X., Meng W.H., Pan W.H., Han J., Liao Y.C. (2022): Effect of soil water content changes caused by ridge-furrow plastic film mulching on the root distribution and water use pattern of spring maize in the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Water Management, 261: 107338. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content