Plant Soil Environ., 2025, 71(1):36-47 | DOI: 10.17221/459/2024-PSE

Dissecting the osmotic and oxidative stress responses in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive wheat genotypes under saline conditionsOriginal Paper

Ulkar Ibrahimova1,2, Javanshir Talai2, Md. Mahadi Hasan3, Irada Huseynova1, Vaseem Raja4, Anshu Rastogi5, Hamideh Ghaffari6,7, Marek Zivcak7, Xinghong Yang7, Marian Brestic7,8
1 Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnologies, Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan
2 Research Institute of Crop Husbandry, Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan
3 State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P.R. China
4 University Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh, University, Gharuan, Mohali Punjab, India
5 Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland
6 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
7 College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, P.R. China
8 Institute of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Salinity represents a significant abiotic stress that markedly influences plant growth through osmotic stress induction. Plants commonly undergo osmotic adaptation when subjected to prolonged periods of saline stress. The current experiments were conducted on five wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes with contrasting salt tolerance capacities – Mirbashir 128, Gobustan, Gyzyl bughda, Fatima, and Zirva 80 under salinity stress caused by 150 mmol NaCl. The relative water content and osmotic potential were found to decrease significantly in salinity-sensitive genotypes (Fatima and Zirva 80) compared to salinity-tolerant ones (Mirbashir 128, Gobustan, and Gyzyl bughda) when treated with 150 mmol NaCl. Salinity also caused the accumulation of soluble sugars and proline, the amounts of which were observed to be higher in salinity-tolerant genotypes than sensitive ones, while lipid peroxidation was higher in salinity-sensitive genotypes. In salinity-tolerant genotypes, 150 mmol NaCl caused increased antioxidant enzyme activities and accumulation of flavonoids, including anthocyanins, confirming the rapid development of the stress reactions in these plants. Differences in the osmoregulation indicators and antioxidant responses between salinity-tolerant and sensitive plants are assumed to be related to their salinity-tolerance traits. This investigation provides pivotal foundational insights for enhancing the salt tolerance of wheat genotypes, thereby potentially enhancing both yield and quality in diverse wheat cultivars thriving in saline environments.

Keywords: ascorbate; malondialdehyde; osmolytes; reactive oxygen species; water transport

Received: August 23, 2024; Revised: October 24, 2024; Accepted: November 6, 2024; Prepublished online: January 7, 2025; Published: January 8, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ibrahimova U, Talai J, Mahadi Hasan M, Huseynova I, Raja V, Rastogi A, et al.. Dissecting the osmotic and oxidative stress responses in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive wheat genotypes under saline conditions. Plant Soil Environ. 2025;71(1):36-47. doi: 10.17221/459/2024-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Abdel Latef A.A. (2010): Changes of antioxidative enzymes in salinity tolerance among different wheat cultivars. Cereal Research Communica-tions, 38: 43-55. Go to original source...
  2. Abdulmajeed A.M., Alnusairi G.S., Alharbi M.H., Almushhin A., Hasan M.M., Soliman M.H. (2021): Alleviation of copper phytotoxicity by acetyl-salicylic acid and nitric oxide application in mung bean involves the up-regulation of antioxidants, osmolytes, and glyoxalase system. Journal of Plant Interactions, 16: 201-212. Go to original source...
  3. Alabdallah N.M., Hasan M.M., Salih A.M., Roushdy S.S., Al-Shammari A.S., Alsanie S.I., El-Zaidy M. (2021): Silver nanoparticles improve growth and protect against oxidative damage in eggplant seedlings under drought stress. Plant, Soil and Environment, 67: 617-624. Go to original source...
  4. Allen S., Grimshaw H., Rowland A. (1986): Chemical Analysis. In: Chapman S.B., Moore P.D. (eds): Methods in Plant Ecology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications. ISBN: 0632009896
  5. Ashraf M., Foolad M.R. (2007): Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59: 206-216. Go to original source...
  6. Athar H.U., Khan A., Ashraf M. (2009): Inducing salt tolerance in wheat by exogenously applied ascorbic acid through different modes. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32: 1-19. Go to original source...
  7. Barr H., Weatherley P. (1962): A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15: 413-428. Go to original source...
  8. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. (1973): Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207. Go to original source...
  9. Bouthour D., Kalai T., Chaffei H.C., Gouia H., Corpas F.J. (2015): Differential response of NADP-dehydrogenases and carbon metabolism in leaves and roots of two durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars (Karim and Azizi) with different sensitivities to salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 179: 56-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Caverzan A., Casassola A., Brammer S.P. (2016): Antioxidant responses of wheat plants under stress. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 39: 1-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Cheng Y.J., Kim M.D., Deng C.C., Kwak W., Chen W. (2013): Enhanced salt stress tolerance in transgenic potato plants expressing ibMYB1, a sweet potato transcription factor. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 23: 1737-1746. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Chunthaburee S., Dongsansuk A., Sanitchon J., Pattanagul W., Theerakulpisut P. (2016): Physiological and biochemical parameters for evaluation and clustering of rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance at seedling stage. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 23: 467-477. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Daneshmand F., Arvin M.J., Kalantari K.M. (2010): Physiological responses to NaCl stress in three wild species of potato in vitro. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 32: 91-101. Go to original source...
  14. Dumanovic J., Nepovimova E., Natic M., Kuca K., Jacevic V. (2021): The significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense system in plants: a concise overview. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11: 11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Dvorak P., Krasylenko Y., Zeiner A., Samaj J., Takac T. (2021): Signaling toward reactive oxygen species-scavenging enzymes in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11: 618835. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Fales F.W. (1951): The yeast cells' assimilation and degradation of carbohydrates. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193: 113-124. Go to original source...
  17. Feki K., Tounsi S., Brini F. (2017): Comparison of an antioxidant system in tolerant and susceptible wheat seedlings in response to salt stress. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7: 15. Go to original source...
  18. Garg N., Singla R. (2009): Variability in the response of chickpea cultivars to short-term salinity, in terms of water retention capacity, membrane permeability, and osmo-protection. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 33: 57-63. Go to original source...
  19. Hamed K.B., Chibani F., Abdelly C., Magne C. (2014): Growth, sodium uptake, and antioxidant responses of coastal plants differing in their eco-logical status under increasing salinity. Biologia, 69: 193-201. Go to original source...
  20. Hasan M.M., Rahman M.A., Corpas F.J., Rahman M.M., Jahan M.S., Liu X.D., Ghimire S., Alabdallah N.M., Wassem M., Alharbi B.M., Raza A. (2023a): Salt stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): a proteomic overview of recent advances and future prospects. Plant Stress, 23: 100307. Go to original source...
  21. Hasan M.M., Alabdallah N.M., Salih A.M., Al-Shammari A.S., Al Zahrani S.S., Al Lawati A.H., Jahan M.S., Rahman M.A., Fang X.W. (2023b): Modification of starch content and its management strategies in plants in response to drought and salinity: current status and future prospects. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23: 92-105. Go to original source...
  22. Hasanuzzaman M., Raihan M.R.H., Masud A.A.C., Rahman K., Nowroz F., Rahman M., Nahar K., Fujita M. (2021): Regulation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defence in plants under salinity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22: 9326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Hmidi D., Abdelly C., Athar H., Ashraf M., Messedi D. (2018): Effect of salinity on osmotic adjustment, proline accumulation and possible role of ornithine-d-aminotransferase in proline biosynthesis in Cakile maritima. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 24: 1017-1033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Hussein M., Embiale A., Husen A., Aref I.M., Iqbal M. (2017): Salinity-induced modulation of plant growth and photosynthetic parameters in faba bean (Vicia faba) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 49: 867-877.
  25. Ibrahimova U., Zivcak M., Gasparovic K., Rastogi A., Allakhverdiev S.I., Yang X., Brestic M. (2021): Electron and proton transport in wheat exposed to salt stress: is the increase of the thylakoid membrane proton conductivity responsible for decreasing the photosynthetic activity in sensitive genotypes? Photosynthesis Research, 150: 195-211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Ingrisano R., Tosato E., Trost P., Gurrieri L., Sparla F. (2023): Proline, cysteine and branched-chain amino acids in abiotic stress response of land plants and microalgae. Plants, 12: 3410. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Kumar G.N.M., Knowles N.R. (1993): Changes in lipid peroxidation and lipolytic and free-radical scavenging enzyme activities during ageing and sprouting of potato (Solanum tuberosum) seed-tubers. Plant Physiology, 102: 115-124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Laus M.N., Santis M.A., Flagella Z., Soccio M. (2022): Changes in antioxidant defence system in durum wheat under hyperosmotic stress: a concise overview. Plants, 11: 98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Mbarki S., Sytar O., Zivcak M., Abdelly C., Cerda A., Brestic M. (2018): Anthocyanins of coloured wheat genotypes in specific response to salt stress. Molecules, 23: 1518. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Mnich E., Bjarnholt N., Eudes A., Harholt J., Holland C., Jørgensen B. (2020): Phenolic cross-links: building and deconstructing the plant cell wall. Natural Product Reports, 37: 919-961. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Nakano Y., Asada K. (1981): Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22: 867-880. Go to original source...
  32. Naing A.H., Park K.I., Ai T.N., Chung M.Y., Han J.S., Kang Y.W., Lim K.B., Kim C.K. (2017): Overexpression of snapdragon Delila (Del) gene in tobacco enhances anthocyanin accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biology, 17: 65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Nassar R., Kamel H.A., Ghoniem A.E. (2020): Physiological and anatomical mechanisms in wheat to cope with salt stress induced by seawater. Plants, 9: 237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Pour-Aboughadareh A., Mehrvar M.R., Sanjani S., Amini A., Nikkhah-Chamanabad H., Asadi A. (2021): Effects of salinity stress on seedling biomass, physiochemical properties, and grain yield in different breeding wheat genotypes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 43: 98-112. Go to original source...
  35. Raja V., Majeed U., Kang H., Andrabi K.I., John R. (2017): Abiotic stress: interplay between ROS, hormones and MAPKs. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 137: 142-157. Go to original source...
  36. Radi A.A., Farghali F.A., Hamada A.M. (2013): Physiological and biochemical responses of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive wheat and bean cultivars to salinity. Journal of Biology and Earth Sciences, 3: 72-88.
  37. Rastogi A., Kovar M., He X., Zivcak M., Kataria S., Kalaji H.M., Skalicky M., Ibrahimova U.F., Hussain S., Mbarki S., Brestic M. (2020): JIP-test as a tool to identify salinity tolerance in sweet sorghum genotypes. Photosynthetica, 58: 518-528. Go to original source...
  38. Sairam R.K., Rao K.V., Srivastava G.C. (2002): Differential response of wheat genotypes to long-term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science, 163: 1037-1046. Go to original source...
  39. Singh S., Kumar S., Singh N. (2020): Regulation of proline biosynthesis, signal transduction, transport, accumulation and its implication in plants under stressful conditions. Current Plant Biology, 21: 100-168.
  40. Seleiman M.F., Semida W.M., Rady M.M., Mohamed G.F., Hemida K.A., Alhammad B.A., Hassan M.M., Shami A. (2020): Sequential application of antioxidants rectifies ion imbalance and strengthens antioxidant systems in salt-stressed cucumber. Plants, 9: 1783. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Shoeva O.Y., Gordeeva E.I., Arbuzova V.S., Khlestkina E.K. (2017): Anthocyanins participate in protection of wheat seedlings from osmotic stress. Cereal Research Communications, 45: 47-56. Go to original source...
  42. Smeekens S. (2000): Sugar-induced signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 51: 49-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Spormann S., Nadais P., Sousa F., Pinto M., Martins M., Sousa B., Soares C. (2023): Accumulation of proline in plants under contaminated soils - are we on the same page? Antioxidants, 12: 666. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Tasmina T., Khan A.R., Karim A., Akter N., Islam R. (2017): Physiological changes of wheat varieties under water deficit condition. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal, 19: 105-114. Go to original source...
  45. Yang Y., Guo Y. (2017): Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytologist, 217: 523-539. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Zhao S., Zhang Q., Liu M., Zhou H., Ma C., Wang P. (2021): Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22: 4609. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Zulfiqar F., Akram N.A., Ashraf M. (2020): Osmoprotection in plants under abiotic stresses: new insights into a classical phenomenon. Planta, 251: 3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.