Plant Soil Environ., 2002, 48(3):125-132 | DOI: 10.17221/4209-PSE
Evaluation of the CERES models in different production regions of the Czech Republic
- Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Czech Republic
- 1 Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
- 2 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
The main goal of this work was to calibrate and evaluate the CERES-Barley and CERES-Wheat crop models. The experimental fields used for the model evaluation are situated in three different production regions (maize, sugar beet and potato main growing regions, respectively) with altitudes of 179, 204 and 560 meters above the sea level. Grain yield and date of anthesis together with maturity dates served as reference for the model evaluation. Two evaluation approaches were tested in this study. The first one uses historical data series and it is based on long-term field experiments with capability to reflect interannual weather variability. The second approach uses results of one-year multiple treatment experiment. The model evaluation is then based on a set of treatments differing e.g. in sowing date or an amount of used nitrogen fertilizer. Grain yields simulated by both models are acceptable when compared with experimental results: the coefficient of determination for historical series varied from 0.69 to 0.86 for evaluation of CERES-Barley at the three examined sites and reached values of 0.60 and 0.86 for the CERES-Wheat model at two experimental sites. The lower coefficient of determination of the wheat model was recorded at the locality with the highest altitude and coldest winter conditions. There, also the worst reliability of simulated phenological development was noted. At the second locality where the CERES-Wheat model was tested and at all three localities where CERES-Barley was applied, the simulated duration of vegetation period and anthesis dates were relatively accurate and yielded strong statistical correlation. The one-year multiple treatment experiment proved to be useful to determine the models sensitivity to differences in crop management. The combination of both approaches seems to be the best solution for evaluation of similar crop models if the detail long term experimental data are not available.
Keywords: spring barley; winter wheat; crop model; model evaluation
Published: March 31, 2002 Show citation
References
- Addiscot T., Smith J., Bradbury N. (1995): Critical evaluation of models and their parameters. J. Envir. Qual., 34: 803-807.
Go to original source...
- Alexandrov V., Eitzinger J., Formayer H. (2000): Vulnerability and adaptation assessment of agricultural crops under climate change in north-east Austria. Proc. 3rd Eur. Conf. Appl. Climatol. Tools for the environment and man of the year 2000, Pisa, Italy.
- Básci Z., Hunkár M. (1994): Assessment of impact of climatic change on the yields of winter wheat and maize using crop models, IDÖJÁRÁS. Quart. J. Hung. Meteorol. Serv., 2: 119-134.
- Chipansky A.C, Ripley E.A., Lawford R.G. (1997): Early prediction of spring wheat yields in Saskatchewan from current and historical weather data using CERES-Wheat model. Agric. For. Meteorol., 84: 223-232.
Go to original source...
- Colson J., Bouniols A., James J.W. (1995): Soybean reproductive development: adapting a model for European cultivars. Agron. J.: 1129-1139.
Go to original source...
- Dubrovský M., ®alud Z., ©?astná M. (2000): Sensitivity of CERES-Maize yields to statistical structure of daily weather series. Clim. Change, 46: 447-472.
Go to original source...
- Eitzinger J., ®alud Z., van Diepen C.A., Trnka M., Semerádová D., Dubrovský M., Oberforster M. (2000): Calibration and evaluation of the WOFOST model for winter wheat. In: 8th Int. Poster Day. Transport of water, chemicals and energy in the system soil-crop canopy-atmosphere, Bratislava.
- Hoogenboom G., Jones J.W., Wilkens P.W., Batchelor W.D., Bowen W.T., Hunt L. A., Pickering N.B., Singh U., Godwin D.C., Bear B., Booote K. J., Ritchie J.T., White J.W. (1994): Crop models, DSSAT Version 3.0. Int. Benchmark Sites Netw. Agrotechnol. Transf. Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu: 692.
- Nonhebel S., (1994): Inaccuracies in weather data and their effects on crop growth simulation results. II. Water-limited production. Clim. Res., 4: 61-74.
Go to original source...
- Penning de Vries F.W.T. (1977): Evaluation of simulation models in agriculture and biology: conclusion of a workshop. Agric. Syst., 2: 99-107.
Go to original source...
- Supit I., Hooijer A.A., van Diepen C.A. (eds.) (1994): System description of the WOFOST 6.0 crop simulation model implemented in CGMS Jt. Res. Cent. Comm. Eur. Commun., Luxembourg.
- Thornton P.K., Dent B.J., Bazci Z. (1991): A framework for crop growth simulation model applications. Agric. Syst., 37: 327-340.
Go to original source...
- Wolf J. (1993): Effects of climate change on wheat production potential in the European Community. Eur. J. Agron., 2: 281-292.
Go to original source...
- ®alud Z., Dubrovský M., ©?astná M. (1999): Modelling climate change impacts on maize and wheat growth and development. Proc. ESA Int. Symp. Modelling crop systems, Lleida, Spain, 277-278.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.