Plant Soil Environ., 2003, 49(10):457-465 | DOI: 10.17221/4157-PSE

Modification of crop management and its influence on the structure of yield and duality of spring barley grain

K. Koutná, R. Cerkal, J. Zimolka
Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Czech Republic

In 1998-2000, in a multi-factorial field experiment established by the method of split blocks and subplots, we studied the effect of three systems of beet tops management, two sowing rates and two levels of N fertilization and the effect of interactions of the factors on production and qualitative indicators of spring barley varieties Amulet and Kompakt. The evaluation shows the dominant effect of the particular year on the variability of all characters. The proportion of the effect of the year on the variability of characters ranged from 2.1 (number of plants per m2) to 80.1% (yield). The variability of quality parameters was also considerably affected by the genetic factor of the variety (grain over2.5 mmsieve 40.4%, TGW 20.5%). The level of characters was greatly variable in relation to the course of climatic conditions of the year. The highest grain yield was achieved in 1999 (7.21 t/ha), the lowest one in 2000 (5.25 t/ha). The best quality parameters were shown by grain from the 1998 harvest (yield 6.20 t/ha) with significantly highest TGW (47.76 g), a high proportion of grain over2.5 mmsieve (92.01%, 5.54 t/ha) and a favourable content of N substances in the grain (10.60%). Ploughed down beet tops supported the creation of the yield, the average differences between variants were, however, minimal being heavily affected by the course of weather in particular years. More favourable conditions for the creation of the yield (6.17 t/ha) and for the formation of mechanical properties of the spring barley grain (TGW45.55 g, grain over2.5 mmsieve 85.86%) were produced by variants with late ploughing down beet tops, the smallest accumulation of N substances occurred in variants with harvested beet tops (11.83%). Sowing rate significantly affected values of all studied characters. Variants sown 4.5 MGS (6.27 t/ha) gave higher average grain yields, grain of better quality was obtained from the stands sown 3.5 MGS (TGW45.22 g, grain over 2.5 sieve 84.41%, N substances 11.93%). Between particular varieties, significant differences were found both in the economic yield and the grain quality. The Kompakt variety showed on average 4.7% higher yield (6.37 t/ha) than the Amulet variety which, however, reached the higher average TGW values as well as the proportion of grain over2.5 mmsieve (45.87 g, 88.24%). The grain quality of the Amulet variety was negatively affected by the increased accumulation of N substances in the grain (12.49%). As compared with control, N fertilization at the rate of 30 kg/ha showed significant increase in the yield in 1998 only (by 7.5%) while in other years, an increase in the yield was not noticed. In all years under investigation, the TGW values and the proportion of grain over2.5 mmsieve decreased and the content of N substances in grain increased after application of N at the rate of 30 kg/ha.

Keywords: spring barley; beet tops; yield; yield structure; grain quality; N fertilization; sowing rate

Published: October 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Koutná K, Cerkal R, Zimolka J. Modification of crop management and its influence on the structure of yield and duality of spring barley grain. Plant Soil Environ. 2003;49(10):457-465. doi: 10.17221/4157-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Cerkal R., Zimolka J., Hřivna L. (2001): Using plough down of sugar beet tops to affect the production parameters of spring barley in a maize-growing region. Rostl. Výr., 47: 319-325.
  2. Ehrenbergerová J., Vaculová K., Zimolka J., Müllerová E. (1999): Yield characters and their correlations with quality indicators of hull-less spring barley grain. Rostl. Výr., 45: 53-59. (In Czech)
  3. Flašarová M., Onderka M. (1997): Formation and compensation of yield components in chosen spring barley genotypes. Rostl. Výr., 43: 449-454. (In Czech)
  4. Kandera M. (1994): The effect of nitrogen fertilizing on the grain yields of spring barley and its quality. Rostl. Výr., 40: 577-585. (In Czech)
  5. Kopecký M. (1983): The effect of some intensification factors on the yield and quality of spring barley Opal, Karat and Zefír. Rostl. Výr., 29: 973-984. (In Czech)
  6. Ložek O., Bízik J., Fecenko J. (1991): Dynamics of inorganic nitrogen in the soil and its influence on the yield and quality of spring barley. Rostl. Výr., 37: 441-451. (In Czech)
  7. Provazník K., Richter R., Zimolka J. (2000): Ploughing in sugar beet tops and the effect on the content of mineral nitrogen in the soil during spring barley cultivation. Rostl. Výr., 46: 443-449. (In Czech)
  8. Tichý F., Kopecký M., Souček A. (1991): The influence of the basic intensification factor on yield and quality of spring barley. Rostl. Výr., 35: 1293-1305. (In Czech)
  9. Tóth Š. (2000): The influence of selected growing factors on the spring barley yield. Rostl. Výr., 46: 297-301.
  10. Zimolka J., Richter R., Ehrenbergerová J., Cerkal R. (1999): Effect of the date of ploughing in of sugar-beet tops on the yield and quality of malt barley. Proc. Int. Conf. ISTRO 99, Brno: 216-218.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.