Plant Soil Environ., 2005, 51(2):51-56 | DOI: 10.17221/3555-PSE

Resistance to salinity stress and available water levels at the seedling stage of the common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)

A. Orak1, E. Ateş2
1 Department of Field Crops, Tekirdag Agriculture Faculty, Trakya University, Turkey
2 Plant Breeding Application and Research Centre, Trakya University, Tekirdag, Turkey

This research was carried out in the Field Crop Department, Tekirda Agriculture Faculty, and Plant Breeding Application and Research Centre, Trakya University, Turkey. The response of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) seedlings to salt and available water level tolerance were compared for its water retention capability and the dry matter of shoots, root and shoot weights after 2 h incubation at 30°C and 1 h incubation at 105°C under the conditions of absence, as well as the presence of various levels of salinity and available water. Germination was not affected by the salinity and available water treatments. 1.35 dS/m salinity water treatment resulted in increasing the fresh weights of its shoot (1.179 g) and root (0.580 g), weights after 2 h incubation at 30°C (shoot: 0.0456 and root: 0.0325 g) and 1 h incubation at 105°C (shoot: 0.0104 g and root: 0.0073 g), water retention capability (0.0123 g) and dry matter (0.0236 g) of the shoot in seedlings. The highest fresh weight (root: 0.567 g and shoot: 1.113 g) and water retention capability (0.0112 g) were determined from capacity of the field.

Keywords: water retention capability; fresh weight; dry matter; shoot; root; seedling

Published: February 28, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Orak A, Ateş E. Resistance to salinity stress and available water levels at the seedling stage of the common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Plant Soil Environ. 2005;51(2):51-56. doi: 10.17221/3555-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Açikgöz N., Akbaş M.E., Moghaddam A., Özcan K. (1994): Turkish data based statistics programmer for PC. 1st Turkey Field Crops Congress, Ege University Press: 264-267.
  2. Açikgöz E., Tekeli A.S. (1980): Önemli Yembitkileri ve Tarimi. T.C. Tarim ve Orman Bakanliği Ziraat İşleri Genel Müd. Yayinlari: 20-21. Al-Busaidi A.S., Cooksen P. (2003): Salinity-pH relationships in calcareous soils. Agricultural and Marine Science, 8: 41-46. Go to original source...
  3. Arin L., Kiyak Y. (2003): The effects of pre-sowing treatments on emergence and seedling growth of tomato seed (L. esculentum Mill.) under several stress conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 6: 990-994. Go to original source...
  4. Ateş A., Tekeli A.S. (2001): Comparison of yield and yield components wild and cultivated Persian clover (T. resupinatum L.). 4th Turkey Field Crops Congress, PAYMAŞ Press, Grassland and Forage Crops, 3: 67-72. Go to original source...
  5. Bischoff J., Werner H. (2004): Salt salinity tolerance of common agricultural crops in South Dakota; Forages and grasses/grain and field crops. http://agbiopubs.sdstate.edu/articles/FS903.pdf.
  6. Bugg R.L. (1995): Cover crop biology: A minireview. Part I. Sustainable Agriculture Technical Reviews, 7: 4.
  7. Cangir C., Boyraz D. (2001): Trakya'daki topraklarin alt ordolarina göre yayilimi ve farkli yörelerdeki ilçelerin arazi kullanim potansiyellerinin değerlendirilmesi. Proceedings of the Trakya Soil and Water Sources Symposium, Köy Hizmetleri Atatürk Araştirma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Kirklareli.
  8. Clarke J.M. (1986): Effect of leaf rolling on leaf water loss in Triticum ssp. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 66: 885-891. Go to original source...
  9. Cramer G.R. (1992): Kinetics of maize leaf elongations. II. Responses of a Na-excluding cultivar and Na-including cultivar to varying Na/Ca salinities. Journal of Experimental Botany, 43: 857-864. Go to original source...
  10. Evlagon D., Ravina I., Neumann P.M. (1992): Effects of salinity stress and calcium hydraulic conductivity and growth in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings roots. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 15: 795-803. Go to original source...
  11. Forbes J.C., Watson R.D. (1992): Plants in agriculture. London, Cambridge University Press: 32-60.
  12. Ghassemi F., Jakeman A.J., Nix H.A. (1995): Salinisation of land and water resources: Human causes, extent, management and case studies. UNSW Press, Sydney, Australia and CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  13. Izzo R., Navari-Izzo F., Quartacci M.F. (1991): Growth and mineral absorption in maize seedlings as affected by increasing NaCl concentrations. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 14: 687-699. Go to original source...
  14. Katuby-Amacher J., Koenig R., Kitchen B.K. (2004): Salinity and plant tolerance. http://extension.usu.edu/publica/agpubs/salini.htm.
  15. Maas E.V. (1990): Crop salt tolerance. In: Tanji K.K. (ed): Agricultural salinity assessment and management. New York, ACSE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, 71: 262-304.
  16. Maiti R.K., Amaya L.E.D., Cardona S.I., Dimas A.M.O., DelaRosaIbarra M., Castillo H.D. (1996): Genotypic variability in maize cultivars (Zea mays L.) for resistance to drought and salinity at the seedling stage. Journal of Plant Physiology, 148: 741-744. Go to original source...
  17. Maiti R.K., De La Rosa-Ibarra M., Sandoval N.D. (1994): Genotypic variability in glossy sorghum lines for resistance to drought, salinity and temperature stress at the seedling stage. Journal of Plant Physiology, 143: 241-244. Go to original source...
  18. Marcum K.B., Marcic A.A., Kopec D.M. (1997): Tolerance of warm season and alternative turfgrasses to salinity. http://ag.arizona.edu/turf/index.htm.
  19. Misra N., Dwivedi U.N. (2004): Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance of green gram cultivars. Plant Science, 166: 1135-1142. Go to original source...
  20. Munns R., Husain S., Rivelli A.R., James R.A., Condon A.G., Lindsay M.P., Lagudah E.S., Schachtman D.P., Hare R.A. (2002): Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops, and the role of physiologically based selection traits. Plant and Soil, 247: 93-105. Go to original source...
  21. Nordquist P.T., Hergert G.W., Skates B.A., Compton W.A., Marwell J.P. (1992): Phenotypic expression of different maize hybrid genotypes grown on salinesodic soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 15: 2137-2144. Go to original source...
  22. Özdemir N., Gülter C., Aşkin T. (2000): Determination of relations between some soil properties and some soil moisture constants using Path analysis. International Symposium on Desertification 2000, Konya, Soil Science Society of Turkey.
  23. Rhodes D., Rich P.J., Brunk D.G., Rhodes G.C., Pauly J.C.M.H., Hansen L.A. (1989): Development of two isogenic sweet corn hybrids differing for glycinebetaine content. Journal of Plant Physiology, 91: 1112-1121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Sağlam M.T. (1993): Chemical properties of soil. In: Sağlam M.T., Bahtiyar M., Cangir C., Tok H.H. (eds.): Soil science. Istanbul, Anadolu Matbaa Tic. Koll. Şti. Press: 177-236.
  25. Tanji K.K. (1990): Agricultural salinity assessment and management. Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, NY, USA.
  26. Tekeli A.S., Ates E. (2003): Yield and its components in field pea (Pisum arvense L.) lines. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 4: 313-318.
  27. Tuna C., Orak A. (2002): Yield and yield components of some important common vetch (V. sativa L.) genotypes. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 8: 215-218.
  28. Turan Z.M. (1995): Research and experimental methods. Uludağ University, Agricultural Faculty Press, No. 62, Bursa, Turkey.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.