Plant Soil Environ., 2007, 53(9):388-394 | DOI: 10.17221/2295-PSE

Spring malt barley response to elemental sulphur - the prognostic value of N and S concentrations in malt barley leaves

W. Grzebisz, K. Przygocka-Cyna
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań, Poland

The basic concept of malt barley production is to reach a dilution effect of nitrogen accumulated by grains at maturity. A three-year study was undertaken to establish time courses of nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) in leaves as the prerequisite tool for total grain yield prognosis. Sulphur application at the lowest rate of 25 kg/ha significantly increased yields of grain in 2001 and 2003. The time course of N and S concentrations in leaves over the growing season showed declining trends for N and variable for S. At mid tillering (BBA-25) both N and S, but at BBA-31 only N concentrations significantly responded to S rates, and in turn affected patterns of N concentration in barley organs up to maturity. Sulphur concentrations and N:S ratios were useful tools to make reliable prognosis of total grain yield of barley at BBA-31 as indicated by the obtained regression equations. The threshold values for N and S in leaves in order to achieve the maximum total grain yield are 0.4% for S and 8.0 for the N:S ratio as presented by the graphical procedure.

Keywords: malt barley; nitrogen; leaves; sulphur concentrations; N:S ratio; total grain yield prognosis

Published: September 30, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Grzebisz W, Przygocka-Cyna K. Spring malt barley response to elemental sulphur - the prognostic value of N and S concentrations in malt barley leaves. Plant Soil Environ. 2007;53(9):388-394. doi: 10.17221/2295-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson J., Fitzgerald M. (2001): Physiological and metabolic origin of sulphur for the synthesis of seed
  2. Bardsley C.E., Lancaster J.D. (1960): Determination of reserve sulfur and soluble sulfates in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Pro., 24: 265-8. Go to original source...
  3. Benton Jones J., Wolf B., Mills H.A. (1991): Plant Analysis Handbook. Athens Georgia, USA.
  4. Eagles H.A., Bedggood A.G., Panozzo J.F., Martin P.J. (1995): Cultivar and environmental effects on malting quality in barley. Aust. J. Agr. Res., 46: 831-844. Go to original source...
  5. García del Moral L.F., De la Morena I., Ramos J.M. (1999): Effects of nitrogen and foliar sulphur interaction on grain yield and yield components in barley. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 183: 287-295. Go to original source...
  6. Nelson L., Anderson R. (1977): Partitioning of soil test - crop response partitioning. In: Soil Testing: Correlating and Interpreting the Analytical Results. ASA Spec. Publ., No. 39: 19-38. Go to original source...
  7. Savin R., Stone P., Nicolas M., Wardlaw I. (1997): Effects of short period of drought and high temperature on grain growth and starch accumulation by malting barley cultivars. Aust. J. PIant Physiol., 23: 201-210. Go to original source...
  8. Scherer H.W. (2001): Sulphur in crop production. Eur. J. Agron., 14: 81-111. Go to original source...
  9. Schnug E., Haneklaus S. (1998): Diagnosis of sulphur nutrition. In: Schnug E., Beringer H. (eds.): Sulphur in Agroecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht: 1-38. Go to original source...
  10. Zhao F., Hawkesford M., McGrath S. (1999): Sulphur assimilation and effects on yield and quality of wheat. J. Cereal Sci., 30: 1-17. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.