Plant Soil Environ., 2010, 56(7):340-347 | DOI: 10.17221/220/2009-PSE

Physiological regulation of high transpiration efficiency in winter wheat under drought conditions

S. Changhai1,2, D. Baodi1, Q. Yunzhou1, L. Yuxin1,2, S. Lei3, L. Mengyu1, L. Haipei4
1 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources & Hebei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water-Saving, Centre for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetic and Developmental Biology, CAS, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
2 Graduate School, CAS, Beijing, P.R. China
3 Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong, P.R. China
4 Huazhong Agricultural University, Huazhong, P.R. China

Pot experiments were conducted to study the variation and physiological regulation of transpiration efficiency (TE) of four winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties that are widely grown in different ecological regions in North China. Plants were grown under two soil moisture regimes, normal and drought stress. The results showed that under drought stress condition, both TE at plant level and TE at leaf level (TEl) increased significantly. The transpiration rate (Tr) was reduced more strongly than leaf net CO2 assimilation rate (Pn). The decline of Tr was mainly affected by stomatal conductance and the decline of Pn was affected by non-stomatal factors, which was confirmed by the decline in net photosynthetic oxygen evolution rate. The leaf soluble sugar content and proline content were significantly increased under drought stress. The stomatal density was increased and the stomatal length was reduced. These results led us to make the following conclusions: (1) Under drought stress, the increase in TEl appears to be regulated in two ways: via the stomata by regulating Tr, and independent of the stomata through regulation of Pn; regulation via the stomata was more sensitive; (2) Osmotic adjustment was closely correlated to the non-stomatal regulation, and stomatal aperture was closely correlated to the stomatal way.

Keywords: winter wheat; drought; transpiration efficiency; stomata; osmotic adjustment; stomatal aperture

Published: July 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Changhai S, Baodi D, Yunzhou Q, Yuxin L, Lei S, Mengyu L, Haipei L. Physiological regulation of high transpiration efficiency in winter wheat under drought conditions. Plant Soil Environ. 2010;56(7):340-347. doi: 10.17221/220/2009-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Blum A. (2009): Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Research, 112: 119-123. Go to original source...
  2. Dong B.D., Liu M.Y., Shao H.B., Li Q.Q., Shi L., Du F., Zhang Z.B. (2008): Investigation on the relationship between leaf water use efficiency and physio-biochemical traits of winter wheat under rained condition. Colloid Surface B, 62: 280-287. Go to original source...
  3. Elisabeth S., Evan D.G.F., Mette T., Piers M.F., Andrew J.D., (2009): Typologies of crop-drought vulnerability: an empirical analysis of the socio-economic factors that influence the sensitivity and resilience to drought of three major food crops in China (1961-2001). Environmental Science and Policy, 12: 438-452. Go to original source...
  4. DaMatta F.M., Chaves A.R.M., Pinheiro H.A., Ducati C., Loureiro M.E. (2003): Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora. Plant Science, 164: 111-117. Go to original source...
  5. Rouhi V., Samson R., Lemeur R., Van Damme P. (2007): Photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics in three different almond species during drought stress and subsequent recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59: 117-129. Go to original source...
  6. Farqhar G.D., Sharkey T.D. (1982): Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 33: 317- 345. Go to original source...
  7. Giorio P., Sorrentino G., d'Andria R. (1999): Stomatal behaviour leaf water status and photosynthetic response in field-grown olive trees under water deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 42: 95-104. Go to original source...
  8. Grant R.F., Arain A., Arora V., Barr A., Black T.A., Chen J., Wang S., Yuan F., Zhang Y. (2005): Intercomparison of techniques to model high temperature effects on CO 2 and energy exchange in temperate and boreal coniferous forests. Ecological Modelling, 188: 217-252. Go to original source...
  9. Jarvis P.G. (1976): The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B: Biological Sciences, 273: 593-610. Go to original source...
  10. Maes W.H., Achten W.M.J., Reubens B., Raes D., Samson R., Muys B. (2009): Plant-water relationships and growth strategies of Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress. Journal of Arid Environment, 73: 877-884. Go to original source...
  11. Kahlown M.A., Raoof A., Zubair M., Kemper W.D. (2007): Water use efficiency and economic feasibility of growing rice and wheat with sprinkler irrigation in the Indus Basin of Pakistan. Agricultural Water Management, 87: 292-298. Go to original source...
  12. Lambers H., Chapin III F.S., Pons T.L. (2005): Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 114.
  13. Osmond C.B., Bjoerkman O., Anderson D.J. (1980): Physiological Process in Plant Ecology toward a Synthesis with Atriplex. Ecological Studies 36. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, SpringVerlag, 347-354.
  14. Riberio R.V., Machado E.C., Oliveira R.F. (2003): Early photosynthetic responses of sweet orange plants infected with Xylella fastidiosa. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 62: 167-173. Go to original source...
  15. Richards R.A. (2006): Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agricultural Water Management, 80: 197-211. Go to original source...
  16. Rouhi V., Samson R., Lemeur R., Damme P.V. (2007): Photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics in three different almond species during drought stress and subsequent recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59: 117-129. Go to original source...
  17. Salvatore L.C., Cristina P., Emanuele S., Venera C., Salvatore F. (2007): Effects of soil water content and nitrogen supply on the productivity of Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu. Mediterranean Environment. Industrial Crop Production, 25: 75-88. Go to original source...
  18. Sankar B., Abdul J.C., Manivannan P., Kishorekumar A., Somasundaram R., Panneerselvam R. (2008): Relative efficacy of water use in five varieties of Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench. Under water-limited conditions. Colloid Surface B, 62: 125-129. Go to original source...
  19. White S.D., Ganf G.G. (2000): Influence of stomatal conductance on the efficiency of internal pressurisation in Typha domingensis. Aquatic Botany, 67: 1-11. Go to original source...
  20. Warren K.C. (2008): Evaluation of wild Solanum species for drought resistance: 1. Solanum gandarillasii Cardenas. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 62: 221-230. Go to original source...
  21. Xue Q.W., Zhu Z.X., Musick J.T., Stewart B.A., Dusek D.A. (2006): Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased wateruse efficiency in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 163: 154-164. Go to original source...
  22. Yang L.M., Han M., Zhou G.S., Li J.D. (2007): The changes in water-use efficiency and stoma density of Leymus chinensis along Northeast China Transect. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27: 16-23. Go to original source...
  23. Zheng B.S., Yan Y.L., Wu J.S., Wang J.G.(2009): Modern Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Research. China Meterological Press, Beijing.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.