Plant Soil Environ., 2012, 58(5):217-223 | DOI: 10.17221/627/2011-PSE

Impact of Bt-transgenic rice (SHK601) on soil ecosystems in the rhizosphere during crop development

M. Wei1,2, F. Tan1,2, H. Zhu1,2, K. Cheng1,2, X. Wu1,2, J. Wang1,2, K. Zhao1,2, X. Tang1,2
1 Biotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Shanghai, P.R. China
2 Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center of Environmental Safety on GM Crops

In contrast to other transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops (e.g. Bt maize and cotton), risk assessments of Bt rice on soil ecosystem are few. To assess the influence of Bt rice on rhizosphere soil ecosystems, soil samples from Bt, non-Bt and controls were taken at seedling, tillering, booting, heading and maturing stages. The activities of dehydrogenases, invertase, phenol oxidases, acid phosphatases, ureases and proteases showed no significant differences between Bt and non-Bt rice. A Biolog system was used to evaluate the effect of Bt rice on functional diversity of microbial communities. Although there were differences in carbon substrate utilization between Bt and non-Bt rice at seedling, tillering and heading stages, these differences were transient and not persistent. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprint patterns showed that Bt rice had little effect on the dominant rhizosphere bacterial, fungal and actinobacterial communities. The richness and consistency of microbial communities according to carbon substrate utilizations and DGGE band patterns did not differ significantly between Bt and non-Bt rice, and were close to that of control soil. There was no evidence to indicate apparent effects of Bt rice on soil enzyme activities, microbial community composition and functional diversity in this study.

Keywords: risk assessment; enzyme activities; microbial community; Biolog EcoPlate; denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Published: May 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wei M, Tan F, Zhu H, Cheng K, Wu X, Wang J, et al.. Impact of Bt-transgenic rice (SHK601) on soil ecosystems in the rhizosphere during crop development. Plant Soil Environ. 2012;58(5):217-223. doi: 10.17221/627/2011-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Bruinsma M., Kowalchuk G.A., Van Veen J.A. (2003): Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Advances in Microbial Ecology, 37: 329-337. Go to original source...
  2. Clark B.W., Phillips T.A., Coates J.R. (2005): Environmental fate and effects of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins from transgenic crops: a review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53: 4643-4653. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Fang M., Kremer R.J., Motavalli P.P., Davis G. (2005): Bacterial diversity in rhizospheres of nontransgenic and transgenic corn. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71: 4132-4136. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gupta V.V.S.R., Watson S. (2004): Ecological Impacts of GM Cotton on Soil Biodiversity: Below-Ground Production of Bt by GM Cotton and Bt Cotton Impacts on Soil Biological Processes. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage, CSIRO Land and Water, 1-72.
  5. Hacket C.A., Grifiths B.S. (1997): Statistical analysis of the timecourse of Biolog substrate utilization. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 30: 63-69. Go to original source...
  6. Heuer H., Krsek M., Baker P., Smalla K., Wellington E.M.H. (1997): Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63: 3233-3241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Icoz I., Saxena D., Andow D., Zwahlen C., Stotzky G. (2008): Microbial populations and enzyme activities in soil in situ under transgenic corn expressing Cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37: 647-662. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kowalchuk G.A., Bruinsma M., Veen J.A. (2003): Assessing responses of soil microorganisms to GM plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 403-410. Go to original source...
  9. Liu W., Lu H.H., Wu W., Wei Q.K., Chen Y.X., Thies J. (2008): Transgenic Bt rice does not affect enzyme activities and microbial composition in the rhizosphere during crop development. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40: 475-486. Go to original source...
  10. Muyzer G., De Waal E.C., Uitterlinden A.G. (1996): Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59: 695-700. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Nannipieri P., Ascher J., Ceccherini M.T., Landi L., Pietramellara G., Renella G. (2003): Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Sciences, 54: 655-670. Go to original source...
  12. Nap J.P., Metz P.L.J., Escaler M., Conner A.J. (2003): The release of genetically modified crops into the environment: Part I. Overview of current status and regulations. Plant Journal, 33: 1-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Rui Y.K., Yi G.X., Zhao J., Wang B.M., Li Z.H., Zhai Z.X., He Z.P., Li Q. (2005): Changes of Bt toxin in the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt cotton and its influence on soil functional bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21: 1279-1284. Go to original source...
  14. Shen R.F., Cai H., Gong W.H. (2006): Transgenic Bt cotton has no apparent effect on enzymatic activities or functional diversity of microbial communities in rhizosphere soil. Plant and Soil, 285: 149-159. Go to original source...
  15. Tabatabai M.A. (1994): Soil enzymes. In: Weaver R.W., Angle J.R., Bottomley P.S. (eds): Methods of Soil Analysis: Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Part 2. SSSA Book Series Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 775-833. Go to original source...
  16. Wang H.Y., Ye Q.F., Wang W., Wu L.C., Wu W.X. (2006): Cry1Ab protein from Bt transgenic rice does not residue in rhizosphere soil. Environmental Pollution, 143: 449-455. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. White T.J., Bruns T.D., Lee S.B., Taylor J.W. (1990): Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., White T.J. (eds): PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York, 315-322. Go to original source...
  18. Wu W.X., Liu W., Lu H.H., Chen Y.X., Devare M., Thies J. (2009): Use of 13C labeling to assess carbon partitioning in transgenic and nontransgenic (parental) rice and their rhizosphere soil microbial communities. FEMS microbiology Ecology, 67: 93-102. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Wu W.X., Ye Q.F., Min H. (2004a): Effects of straws from Bt transgenic rice on selected biological activities in water-flooded soil. European Journal of Soil Biology, 40: 15-22. Go to original source...
  20. Wu W.X., Ye Q.F., Min H., Duan X.J., Jin W.M. (2004b): Bt transgenic rice straw affects the culturable microbiota and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in a flooded paddy soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36: 289-295. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.