Plant Soil Environ., 2012, 58(8):341-346 | DOI: 10.17221/174/2011-PSE

Agronomically important traits of emmer wheat

P. Konvalina1, I. Capouchová2, Z. Stehno3
1 Department of Applied Plant Biotechnologies, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

Particular agronomic traits of six landraces of Triticum diccocum Schrank (Schuebl) were studied during three years in Prague and České Budějovice localities, Czech Republic. The analysis of tolerance to drought by using the method of 13C discrimination (CID) was also focused on in the research. All the tested varieties were resistant to usual wheat diseases. An inclination of particular varieties to lodging and a low harvest index rate (0.33) were negative factors having a significant effect on the yield rate. Meanwhile, all the varieties contained a high percentage of proteins in grain (17.92%) which was an important advantage in low input conditions. The landraces of emmer wheat also proved to be more tolerant to drought (CID = 25.82‰) than check varieties of bread wheat (CID = 26.70‰). Results of the research showed that some of the emmer landraces may be successfully grown and used directly in low-input farming systems or in breeding programs focused on the breeding of suitable varieties for low-input farming.

Keywords: agronomic traits; drought tolerance; emmer; grain quality

Published: August 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Konvalina P, Capouchová I, Stehno Z. Agronomically important traits of emmer wheat. Plant Soil Environ. 2012;58(8):341-346. doi: 10.17221/174/2011-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Araus J.L., Slafer G.A., Reynolds M.P., Rovo C. (2002): Plant breeding and drought in C-3 cereals: What should we breed for? Annals of Botany, 89: 925-940. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bucur D., Savu P. (2006): Considerations for the design of intercepting drainage for collecting water from seep areas. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 132: 597-599. Go to original source...
  3. Cudney D.W., Jordan L.S., Hall A.E. (1991): Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua) infestations on light interception and growth rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Science, 39: 175-179. Go to original source...
  4. Ehdaie B., Hall A.E., Fagquahar G.D., Nguyen H.T., Waines J.G. (1991): Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in wheat. Crop Science, 31: 1282-1288. Go to original source...
  5. Farquhar G.D., Richards R.A. (1984): Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 11: 539-552. Go to original source...
  6. Konvalina P., Moudrý J., Dotlačil L., Stehno Z., Moudrý jr. J. (2010): Drought tolerance of landraces of emmer wheat in comparison to soft wheat. Cereal Research Communications, 38: 429-439. Go to original source...
  7. Márton L., Pilar P.M., Grewal M.S. (2007): Long term studies of crop yields with changing rainfall and fertilization. Agricultural Engineering Research, 13: 37-47.
  8. Marconi M., Cubadda R. (2005): Emmer Wheat. In: Abdel-Aal E.-S.M., Wood P. (eds.): Speciality Grains for Food and Feed. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, 63-108.
  9. O'Leary M.H. (1988): Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. BioScience, 38: 328-336. Go to original source...
  10. Rebetzke G.J., Condon A.G., Richards R.A., Farquhar G.D. (2002): Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Science, 42: 739-745. Go to original source...
  11. Shirazi M.U., Gyamfi J.A., Ram T., Bachiri H., Rasyid B., Rehman A., Khan M.A., Mujtaba S.M., Ali M., Shreen A., Mumtaz S. (2010): Selection of some suitable drought tolerant wheat genotypes using carbon isotopes discrimination (CID) technique. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42: 3639-3644.
  12. Trčková M., Raimanová I., Stehno Z. (2005): Differences among Triticum dicoccum, T. monococcum and T. spelta in rate of nitrate uptake. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 41: 322-324. Go to original source...
  13. Troccoli A., Codianni P. (2005): Appropriate seeding rate for einkorn, emmer, and spelt grown under rainfed conditions in southern Italy. European Journal of Agronomy, 22: 293-300. Go to original source...
  14. Vita P., Riefolo C., Codianni P., Cattivelli L., Fares C. (2006): Agronomic and qualitative traits of T. turgidum ssp. dicoccum genotypes cultivated in Italy. Euphytica, 150: 195-205. Go to original source...
  15. Zaharieva M., Ayana N.G., Al Hakimi A., Misra S.C., Monneveux P. (2010): Cultivated emmer wheat (Triticum diccocum Schrank), an old crop with a promising future: a review. Genetics Resources and Crop Evolution, 57: 937-962. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.