Plant Soil Environ., 2015, 61(7):332-338 | DOI: 10.17221/279/2015-PSE

Physiological response of juvenile hop plants to water deficitOriginal Paper

V. Hejnák, H. Hniličková, F. Hnilička
Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

This paper evaluates the response on the rate of photosynthesis (Pn), transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs) and water use efficiency (WUE) in 15 genotypes of young hop plants (19 BBCH) grown in greenhouses in the conditions of water deficit for the period of 9 days. On the 9th day, the relative content of water in the experimental plants fluctuated between 70.14-75.20%. The levels of Pn and gs evidently dropped in the monitored species as a result of the water deficit. The decrease of Pn in the experimental plants compared with the control group was largest in the Saaz Os. cl. 72 (by 77.5%), Magnum (by 73.3%) and Columbus (by 62.3%). To the contrary, the lowest Pn decrease was noted in the case of genotypes Saaz Late (by 15.7%), Vital (by 23.9%) and Premiant (by 24.2%). All genotypes except for cv. H16 showed an evident decrease of E. Judging by the highest values of WUE, the most effective water management was shown by Premiant, Vital and Saaz Late genotypes. A significant stomatal limitation of photosynthesis due to water stress was identified in the most widely used Czech cultivar, Saaz Os. cl. 72, with low values of stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and transpiration.

Keywords: Humulus lupulus L.; gas exchange; precipitation deficit; period of drought

Published: July 31, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hejnák V, Hniličková H, Hnilička F. Physiological response of juvenile hop plants to water deficit. Plant Soil Environ. 2015;61(7):332-338. doi: 10.17221/279/2015-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Bohnert H.J., Jensen R.G. (1996): Strategies for engineering waterstress tolerance in plants. Trends in Biotechnology, 14: 89-97. Go to original source...
  2. Chaves M.M., Pereira J.S., Maroco J., Rodrigues M.L., Ricardo C.P.P., Osório M.L., Carvalho I., Faria T., Pinheiro C. (2002): How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany, 89: 907-916. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Condon A.G., Richards R.A., Rebetzke G.J., Farquhar G.D. (2004): Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55: 2447-2460. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Galmés J., Ribas-Carbó M., Medrano H., Flexas J. (2011): Rubisco activity in Mediterranean species is regulated by the chloroplastic CO 2 concentration under water stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62: 653-665. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Hejnák V., Hniličková H., Hnilička F. (2014): Effect of ontogeny, heterophylly and leaf position on the gas exchange of the hop plant. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60: 525-530. Go to original source...
  6. Hniličková H., Novák V. (2000): Accumulation of energy by nonirrigated and irrigated hop plants (Humulus lupulus L.). Rostlinná Výroba, 46: 465-469. (In Czech)
  7. Hsiao T.H. (1973): Plant response to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 24: 524-570. Go to original source...
  8. Hu Y.C., Shao H.B., Chu L.Y., Gang W. (2006): Relationship between water use efficiency (WUE) and production of different wheat genotypes at soil water deficit. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 53: 271-277. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Kenny S.T. (2005): Photosynthetic measurements in hop (Humulus). ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 668: 241-248. Go to original source...
  10. Korovetska H., Novák O., Jůza O., Gloser V. (2014): Signalling mechanisms involved in the response of two varieties of Humulus lupulus L. to soil drying: I. changes in xylem sap pH and the concentrations of abscisic acid and anions. Plant and Soil, 380: 375-387. Go to original source...
  11. Larcher W. (2003): Physiological Plant Ecology (Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
  12. Lawlor D.W., Tezara W. (2009): Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: A critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Annals of Botany, 103: 561-579. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Lugojan C., Ciulca S. (2011): Evaluation of relative water content in winter wheat. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, 15: 173-177.
  14. Pérez-Alfocea F., Ghanem M.E., Gómez-Cadenas A., Dodd I.C. (2011): Omics of root-to-shoot signaling under salt stress and water deficit. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 15: 893-901. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Rossbauer G., Buhr L., Hack H., Hauptmann S., Klose R., Meier U., Stauss R., Weber E. (1995): Phänologische Entwicklungsstadien von Kultur-Hopfen (Humulus lupulus L.). Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes, 47: 249-253.
  16. Shao H.B., Chu L.Y., Jaleel C.A., Zhao C.X. (2008): Water-deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. Comptes Rendus Biologiques, 331: 215-225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Slavík L., Kopecký J. (1994): The effect of trickle irrigation on the hop yield. Rostlinná Výroba, 40: 13-18. (In Czech)
  18. Sperry J.S. (2000): Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 104: 13-23. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.