Plant Soil Environ., 2016, 62(11):490-496 | DOI: 10.17221/470/2016-PSE
Balancing the use of maize residues for soil amendment and forageOriginal Paper
- 1 State Key Laboratory Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory Crop Biology, National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong, P.R. China
- 2 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation of Shandong, Ministry of Agriculture, Jinan, P.R. China
- 3 Shandong Rice Research Institute, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- 4 Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, College of Food, Agricultural Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Balancing the use of maize (Zea mays L.) residues for soil amendment and forage is an important strategy for agricultural sustainability. Therefore, the study assessed the impacts of four proportions of maize residues to soil retention (S) and forage (F) on soil total organic carbon (TOC); total nitrogen (TN); carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N); grain yield, economic benefits and nutritional contents of removed residues. The concentrations of TOC and TN increased when more residue returned, while the C/N ratios were S100 + F0 > S34 + F66 > S66 + F34. Also, crude protein, crude fat, and crude starch in the removed residues were F34 > F66 > F100, while the crude fiber and ash contents exhibited the opposite trend. The crop yield improved with residue retention increased, but there were no differences on the economic benefits of the four residue-use systems. The S34 + F66 system maintained a TOC ranging from 11.51 to 13.37 g/kg, a TN from 1.12 to 1.16 g/kg, 92.93% of the annual yields of the S100 + F0 system, and 6.2 t/ha/year of forage. Therefore, the S34 + F66 system can balance the use of maize residues for soil amendments and forage to sustainably develop a household crop-livestock system.
Keywords: no-tillage; long-term experiment; wheat-maize rotation system; nutritive contents; spider plot
Published: November 30, 2016 Show citation
References
- AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. 15 th Ed. Arlington, AOAC.
- Benbi D.K., Senapati N. (2010): Soil aggregation and carbon and nitrogen stabilization in relation to residue and manure application in rice-wheat systems in northwest India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 87: 233-247.
Go to original source...
- Blanco-Canqui H., Lal R. (2007): Soil and crop response to harvesting corn residues for biofuel production. Geoderma, 141: 355-362.
Go to original source...
- Chen D.L., Yi Z.X., Zhou W.X., Tu N.M. (2010): Effects of straw return on soil nutrients and microorganisms in late rice under different soil tillage systems. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 30: 1722-1728.
- Clapp C.E., Allmaras R.R., Layese M.F., Linden D.R., Dowdy R.H. (2000): Soil organic carbon and 13 C abundance as related to tillage, crop residue, and nitrogen fertilization under continuous corn management in Minnesota. Soil and Tillage Research, 55: 127-142.
Go to original source...
- Gebrekidan H., Belay A., Uloro Y., Zewdie E. (1999): Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to crop residue management on two major soil types of Alemaya, Eastern Ethiopia: I. Effects of varying rates of applied and residual N and P fertilizers. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 54: 65-71.
Go to original source...
- Gustafson T.J., Coors J.G., de Leon N. (2010): Selection for forage yield and composition on the wisconsin quality synthetic maize population. Crop Science, 50: 1795-1804.
Go to original source...
- Gustafson D.I., Jones J.W., Porter C.H., Hyman G., Edgerton M.D., Gocken T., Shryock J., Doane M., Budreski K., Stone C., Healy D., Ramsey N. (2014): Climate adaptation imperatives: Untapped global maize yield opportunities. International Journal of Agriculture Sustainability, 12: 471-486.
Go to original source...
- Hoskinson R.L., Karlen D.L., Birrell S.J., Radtke C.W., Wilhelm W.W. (2006): Engineering, nutrient removal, and feedstock conversion evaluations of four corn stover harvest scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31: 126-136.
Go to original source...
- Houx J.H., Roberts C.A., Fritschi F.B. (2013): Evaluation of sweet sorghum bagasse as an alternative livestock feed. Crop Science, 53: 1784-1790.
Go to original source...
- Huang G.B., Luo Z.Z., Li L.L., Zhang R.Z., Li G.D., Cai L.Q., Xie J.H. (2012): Effects of stubble management on soil fertility and crop yield of rainfed area in Western Loess Plateau, China. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2012: 1-9.
Go to original source...
- Johnson J.M.F., Acosta-Martinez V., Cambardella C.A., Barbour N.W. (2013): Crop and soil responses to using corn stover as a bioenergy feedstock: Observations from the Northern US Corn Belt. Agriculture, 3: 72-89.
Go to original source...
- Lenka N.K., Lal R. (2013): Soil aggregation and greenhouse gas flux after 15 years of wheat straw and fertilizer management in a no-till system. Soil and Tillage Research, 126: 78-89.
Go to original source...
- Maia S.M.F., Ogle S.M., Cerri C.C., Cerri C.E.P. (2010): Changes in soil organic carbon storage under different agricultural management systems in the Southwest Amazon Region of Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research, 106: 177-184.
Go to original source...
- Malhi S.S., Nyborg M., Solberg E.D., McConkey B., Dyck M., Puurveen D. (2011): Long-term straw management and N fertilizer rate effects on quantity and quality of organic C and N and some chemical properties in two contrasting soils in Western Canada. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47: 785-800.
Go to original source...
- Nelson R.G. (2002): Resource assessment and removal analysis for corn stover and wheat straw in the Eastern and Midwestern United States - Rainfall and wind-induced soil erosion methodology. Biomass and Bioenergy, 22: 349-363.
Go to original source...
- Ning T.Y., Zheng Y.H., Han H.F., Jiang G.M., Li Z.J. (2012): Nitrogen uptake, biomass yield and quality of intercropped springand summer-sown maize at different nitrogen levels in the North China Plain. Biomass and Bioenergy, 47: 91-98.
Go to original source...
- Puget P., Lal R. (2005): Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in a Mollisol in central Ohio as affected by tillage and land use. Soil and Tillage Research, 80: 201-213.
Go to original source...
- Six J., Elliott E.T., Paustian K. (1999): Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63: 1350-1358.
Go to original source...
- Song X.Z. (2001): Development commercial varieties for special purpose improvement benefit of maize hybrid. Journal of Maize Sciences, 9: 45-48.
- Surekha K., Kumari A.P.P., Reddy M.N., Satyanarayana K., Sta Cruz P.C. (2003): Crop residue management to sustain soil fertility and irrigated rice yields. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 67: 145-154.
Go to original source...
- Vadas P.A., Digman M.F. (2013): Production costs of potential corn stover harvest and storage systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 54: 133-139.
Go to original source...
- Valbuena D., Erenstein O., Tui S.H., Abdoulaye T., Claessens L., Duncan A.J., Gérard B., Rufino M.C., Teufel N., van Rooyen A., van Wijk M.T. (2012): Conservation agriculture in mixed crop-livestock systems: Scoping crop residue trade-offs in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Field Crops Research, 132: 175-184.
Go to original source...
- Xu M.G., Lou Y.L., Sun X.L., Wang W., Baniyamuddin M., Zhao K. (2011): Soil organic carbon active fractions as early indicators for total carbon change under straw incorporation. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47: 745-752.
Go to original source...
- Yamashita T., Flessa H., Bettina J., Helfrich M., Ludwig B. (2006): Organic matter in density fractions of water-stable aggregates in silty soils: Effect of land use. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38: 3222-3234.
Go to original source...
- Zhao H.X., Chi S.Y., Ning T.Y., Tian S.Z., Wang B.W., Li Z.J. (2013): Covering farming pattern to improve soil physical properties and crop yield in wheat-maize cropping system. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29: 113-122.
- Zheng Y.H., Wei J.G., Li J., Feng S.F., Li Z.F., Jiang G.M., Lucas M., Wu G.L., Ning T.Y. (2012): Anaerobic fermentation technology increases biomass energy use efficiency in crop residue utilization and biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16: 4588-4596.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.